Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

FMF vs RSST: which moved less with stocks?

Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, FMF moved less with the S&P 500 than RSST: correlation +0.18 against +0.87.

First Trust Managed Futures Strategy Fund and Return Stacked U.S. Stocks & Managed Futures ETF.

+0.18FMF correlation with the S&P 500
+0.87RSST correlation with the S&P 500
−16.2%FMF down-week capture
106.4%RSST down-week capture

ETFIQ Diversifier Score: FMF scores higher

How much does it diversify a stock portfolio?

FMF 81.8RSST 13.94.8, the lowest in this set98.0, the highest

A percentile among the 63 alternatives ETFs with a full year. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All alternatives ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed

FMFRose when the S&P 500 fell
SPY−1.24%FMF+0.20%Average week when SPY fell: 22 of 52, year to Sep 18, 2026SPY−1.24%FMF+0.20%Average week when SPY fell
RSSTFell more than the S&P 500
SPY−1.24%RSST−1.32%Average week when SPY fell: 22 of 52, year to Sep 18, 2026SPY−1.24%RSST−1.32%Average week when SPY fell

One strategy, two funds

FMF and RSST both run a managed futures strategy. Over the same 52 weeks to Sep 18, 2026, FMF’s weekly returns had a correlation of +0.18 with the S&P 500 and RSST’s +0.87. In the 22 weeks the index fell, by 1.24% a week on average, FMF averaged +0.20% and RSST −1.32%. Over the same weeks, FMF finished 11.7 percentage points ahead of cash and RSST finished 32.3 points ahead of cash.

Performance, window by window

FMF and RSST over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnvs the S&P 500
FMFRSSTFMFRSST
3 months+4.9%+5.7%+2.6 pts+3.4 pts
6 months+6.9%+23.9%−11.1 pts+5.9 pts
1 year+15.7%+37.1%−0.9 pts+20.5 pts
3 years+21.0%+76.6%−57.4 pts−1.8 pts
Since launch+33.5%+77.3%−424.0 pts−0.3 pts
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
FMF and RSST on the same fields, as of Sep 18, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
FMF
First Trust Managed Futures Strategy Fund
Managed futures fund: follows price trends in futures on stocks, bonds, currencies and commodities, and can bet on falls as well as rises
RSST
Return Stacked U.S. Stocks & Managed Futures ETF
Managed futures fund: follows price trends in futures on stocks, bonds, currencies and commodities, and can bet on falls as well as rises
IssuerFirst TrustReturn Stacked
StrategyManaged futuresManaged futures
Correlation with the S&P 500+0.18+0.87
Beta to the S&P 500+0.12+1.30
Down-week capture−16.2%106.4%
Average week when the S&P 500 fell+0.20%−1.32%
The S&P 500 in those weeks−1.24%−1.24%
Total return, same 52 weeks+15.3%+35.9%
Against T-bills, percentage points+11.7 pts+32.3 pts
Expense ratio0.98%0.99%
ListedAug 2, 2013Sep 6, 2023
Net assets$288m$415m

FMF in plain words

FMF is a managed futures fund. ETFIQ measures what every alternatives fund is sold on: whether it moves differently from the stock market. Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, its weekly returns had a correlation of +0.18 with the S&P 500’s and a beta of +0.12, so for each 1% the index moved it moved about 0.12% the same way. The S&P 500 fell in 22 of those 52 weeks, by 1.24% on average. In the same weeks FMF rose 0.20% on average, a down-week capture of −16.2%. Over the same 52 weeks FMF returned +15.3% and a Treasury bill fund +3.6%, so it finished 11.7 percentage points ahead of cash.

RSST in plain words

RSST is a managed futures fund. Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, its weekly returns had a correlation of +0.87 with the S&P 500’s and a beta of +1.30, so for each 1% the index moved it moved about 1.30% the same way. In the same weeks RSST fell 1.32% on average, a down-week capture of 106.4%. Over the same 52 weeks RSST returned +35.9% and a Treasury bill fund +3.6%, so it finished 32.3 percentage points ahead of cash.

Questions people ask

Which moved less with the S&P 500, FMF or RSST?
Over the 52 weeks to Sep 18, 2026, FMF’s weekly returns had a correlation of +0.18 with the S&P 500 and RSST’s +0.87, so FMF moved less with the index.
Which did better when the S&P 500 fell, FMF or RSST?
In the 22 weeks the S&P 500 fell, by 1.24% a week on average, FMF averaged +0.20% and RSST −1.32%, so FMF returned more in those weeks.
Which earned more than cash, FMF or RSST?
Over the same weeks, FMF finished 11.7 percentage points ahead of cash and RSST finished 32.3 percentage points ahead of cash. Cash here is BIL, a fund of Treasury bills.
Which is cheaper, FMF or RSST?
FMF charges 0.98% a year and RSST charges 0.99%, so FMF is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

FMF against RSST, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 18, 2026. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, FMF against RSST, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/alternatives/fmf-vs-rsst Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources