Data as of Nov 4, 2026.

vsOpen in the appCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Alternative ETFs

CTA vs PRAE: Correlation to the S&P 500

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, CTA moved less with the S&P 500 than PRAE: correlation −0.14 against +0.79.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about CTA and PRAE

Net assets: $1.3bn on Nov 3, 2026 for Simplify Managed Futures Strategy ETF, and $12m on Jun 30, 2026 for PlanRock Equity Plus Alternatives ETF.

At a glance
−0.14
CTA correlation with the S&P 500
+0.79
PRAE correlation with the S&P 500
5.3%
CTA down-week capture
120.0%
PRAE down-week capture
CTA Fell 5% as much as the S&P 500
Fell 5% as much as the S&P 500CTA in the 26 weeks SPY fell, year to Nov 4, 2026: SPY averaged −1.07%, CTA −0.06%.SPY−1.07%CTA−0.06%Average week when SPY fell: 26 of 52, year to Nov 4, 2026Fell 5% as much as the S&P 500CTA in the 26 weeks SPY fell, year to Nov 4, 2026: SPY averaged −1.07%, CTA −0.06%.SPY−1.07%CTA−0.06%Average week when SPY fell

CTA in the 26 weeks SPY fell, year to Nov 4, 2026: SPY averaged −1.07%, CTA −0.06%.

PRAE Fell more than the S&P 500
Fell more than the S&P 500PRAE in the 26 weeks SPY fell, year to Nov 4, 2026: SPY averaged −1.07%, PRAE −1.29%.SPY−1.07%PRAE−1.29%Average week when SPY fell: 26 of 52, year to Nov 4, 2026Fell more than the S&P 500PRAE in the 26 weeks SPY fell, year to Nov 4, 2026: SPY averaged −1.07%, PRAE −1.29%.SPY−1.07%PRAE−1.29%Average week when SPY fell

PRAE in the 26 weeks SPY fell, year to Nov 4, 2026: SPY averaged −1.07%, PRAE −1.29%.

Pair scorecard

CTA costs 0.63 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 8.7 points.

CTA vs PRAE: Correlation to the S&P 500
MeasureCTAPRAE
Return
Total return, 1 year+4.6%+13.3%
Against its benchmark
Treasury bills, 52 weeks+3.7%
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.86%1.49%
Net assets, CTA as of Nov 3, 2026 and PRAE as of Jun 30, 2026$1.3bn$12m
Holdings
Holdings in commonnot published
Risk
Beta to the S&P 500−0.30: about 0.30% for each 1%+0.95: about 0.95% for each 1%
Its average week when the S&P 500 fellfell 0.06%fell 1.29%
ETFIQ Stock Diversification Score · CTA scores higher How much does it diversify a stock portfolio?
IQ Alternatives Score94.2CTA14.7PRAE

How much it diversifies a stock portfolio, ranked against 17 systematic trend alternatives ETFs with a full year. 100 is best. How it is computed

2.9, the lowest in this set 94.2, the highest

One year of weekly moves against the S&P 500, within one strategy; it ignores what the fund returned. All alternatives ETFs ranked by it →

Method

Window by window

Window by window: CTA vs PRAE: Correlation to the S&P 500
Total return
WindowCTAPRAE
3 months+6.2%+0.2%
6 months−10.8%+0.9%
1 year+4.6%+13.3%
3 years+22.3%–
Since launchNot the same days: CTA Mar 2022 · PRAE Dec 2023+37.8%+37.5%

– means no data for this window. Open this comparison in the app →

Side by side

CTA Simplify Managed Futures Strategy ETF · Managed futures fund: follows price trends in futures on stocks, bonds, currencies and commodities, and can bet on falls as well as rises PRAE PlanRock Equity Plus Alternatives ETF · Managed futures fund: follows price trends in futures on stocks, bonds, currencies and commodities, and can bet on falls as well as rises
Issuer Simplify PlanRock
Strategy Managed futures Managed futures
Correlation with the S&P 500 −0.14 +0.79
Beta to the S&P 500 −0.30 +0.95
Down-week capture 5.3% 120.0%
Average week when the S&P 500 fell −0.06% −1.29%
The S&P 500 in those weeks −1.07% −1.07%
Total return, same 52 weeks +3.6% +13.1%
Against T-bills, percentage points 0.0 pts +9.5 pts
Expense ratio 0.86% 1.49%
First traded Mar 8, 2022 Dec 19, 2023
Net assets, CTA as of Nov 3, 2026 and PRAE as of Jun 30, 2026 $1.3bn $12m

As of Nov 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

One strategy, two funds

CTA and PRAE both run a managed futures strategy. Over the same 52 weeks to Nov 4, 2026, CTA’s weekly returns had a correlation of −0.14 with the S&P 500 and PRAE’s +0.79. In the 26 weeks the index fell, by 1.07% a week on average, CTA averaged −0.06% and PRAE −1.29%. Over the same weeks, CTA finished level with cash and PRAE finished 9.5 points ahead of cash.

Alert

The week's ETF fund flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
CTA

CTA is a managed futures fund. ETFIQ measures what every alternatives fund is sold on: whether it moves differently from the stock market. Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, its weekly returns had a correlation of −0.14 with the S&P 500’s and a beta of −0.30, so for each 1% the index moved it moved about 0.30% the other way. The S&P 500 fell in 26 of those 52 weeks, by 1.07% on average. In the same weeks CTA fell 0.06% on average, a down-week capture of 5.3%. Over the same 52 weeks CTA returned +3.6% and a Treasury bill fund +3.7%, so it finished level with cash.

PRAE

PRAE is a managed futures fund. Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, its weekly returns had a correlation of +0.79 with the S&P 500’s and a beta of +0.95, so for each 1% the index moved it moved about 0.95% the same way. In the same weeks PRAE fell 1.29% on average, a down-week capture of 120.0%. Over the same 52 weeks PRAE returned +13.1% and a Treasury bill fund +3.7%, so it finished 9.5 percentage points ahead of cash.

Questions people ask

Which moved less with the S&P 500, CTA or PRAE?
Over the 52 weeks to Nov 4, 2026, CTA’s weekly returns had a correlation of −0.14 with the S&P 500 and PRAE’s +0.79, so CTA moved less with the index.
Which did better when the S&P 500 fell, CTA or PRAE?
In the 26 weeks the S&P 500 fell, by 1.07% a week on average, CTA averaged −0.06% and PRAE −1.29%, so CTA returned more in those weeks.
Which earned more than cash, CTA or PRAE?
Over the same weeks, CTA finished level with cash and PRAE finished 9.5 percentage points ahead of cash. Cash here is BIL, a fund of Treasury bills.
Which is cheaper, CTA or PRAE?
CTA charges 0.86% a year and PRAE charges 1.49%, so CTA is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, CTA against PRAE, data as of Nov 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/alternatives/cta-vs-prae

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.