Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

CLSE vs HFEQ: which moved less with stocks?

Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, CLSE moved less with the S&P 500 than HFEQ: correlation +0.63 against +0.82.

Convergence Long/Short Equity ETF and Unlimited HFEQ Equity Long/Short ETF.

+0.63CLSE correlation with the S&P 500
+0.82HFEQ correlation with the S&P 500
36.5%CLSE down-week capture
139.9%HFEQ down-week capture

ETFIQ Diversifier Score: CLSE scores higher

How much does it diversify a stock portfolio?

CLSE 44.5HFEQ 16.64.8, the lowest in this set98.0, the highest

A percentile among the 63 alternatives ETFs with a full year. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All alternatives ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed

CLSEFell 37% as much as the S&P 500
SPY−1.24%CLSE−0.45%Average week when SPY fell: 22 of 52, year to Sep 18, 2026SPY−1.24%CLSE−0.45%Average week when SPY fell
HFEQFell more than the S&P 500
SPY−1.24%HFEQ−1.74%Average week when SPY fell: 22 of 52, year to Sep 18, 2026SPY−1.24%HFEQ−1.74%Average week when SPY fell

One strategy, two funds

CLSE and HFEQ both run a long-short equity strategy. Over the same 52 weeks to Sep 18, 2026, CLSE’s weekly returns had a correlation of +0.63 with the S&P 500 and HFEQ’s +0.82. In the 22 weeks the index fell, by 1.24% a week on average, CLSE averaged −0.45% and HFEQ −1.74%. Over the same weeks, CLSE finished 29.5 percentage points ahead of cash and HFEQ finished 11.2 points ahead of cash.

Performance, window by window

CLSE and HFEQ over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnvs the S&P 500
CLSEHFEQCLSEHFEQ
3 months+0.8%−4.9%−1.4 pts−7.2 pts
6 months+23.0%+13.2%+5.0 pts−4.8 pts
1 year+33.9%+14.8%+17.4 pts−1.8 pts
3 years+118.0%not published+39.6 ptsnot published
Since launch+134.6%+27.8%+45.6 pts+3.7 pts
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
CLSE and HFEQ on the same fields, as of Sep 18, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
CLSE
Convergence Long/Short Equity ETF
Long-short equity fund: owns stocks and sells others short, so part of its exposure to the stock market cancels out
HFEQ
Unlimited HFEQ Equity Long/Short ETF
Long-short equity fund: owns stocks and sells others short, so part of its exposure to the stock market cancels out
IssuerConvergenceUnlimited
StrategyLong-short equityLong-short equity
Correlation with the S&P 500+0.63+0.82
Beta to the S&P 500+0.64+1.32
Down-week capture36.5%139.9%
Average week when the S&P 500 fell−0.45%−1.74%
The S&P 500 in those weeks−1.24%−1.24%
Total return, same 52 weeks+33.1%+14.8%
Against T-bills, percentage points+29.5 pts+11.2 pts
Expense ratio1.52%0.96%
ListedFeb 22, 2022Jul 15, 2025
Net assets$614m$16m

CLSE in plain words

CLSE is a long-short equity fund. ETFIQ measures what every alternatives fund is sold on: whether it moves differently from the stock market. Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, its weekly returns had a correlation of +0.63 with the S&P 500’s and a beta of +0.64, so for each 1% the index moved it moved about 0.64% the same way. The S&P 500 fell in 22 of those 52 weeks, by 1.24% on average. In the same weeks CLSE fell 0.45% on average, a down-week capture of 36.5%. Over the same 52 weeks CLSE returned +33.1% and a Treasury bill fund +3.6%, so it finished 29.5 percentage points ahead of cash.

HFEQ in plain words

HFEQ is a long-short equity fund. Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, its weekly returns had a correlation of +0.82 with the S&P 500’s and a beta of +1.32, so for each 1% the index moved it moved about 1.32% the same way. In the same weeks HFEQ fell 1.74% on average, a down-week capture of 139.9%. Over the same 52 weeks HFEQ returned +14.8% and a Treasury bill fund +3.6%, so it finished 11.2 percentage points ahead of cash.

Questions people ask

Which moved less with the S&P 500, CLSE or HFEQ?
Over the 52 weeks to Sep 18, 2026, CLSE’s weekly returns had a correlation of +0.63 with the S&P 500 and HFEQ’s +0.82, so CLSE moved less with the index.
Which did better when the S&P 500 fell, CLSE or HFEQ?
In the 22 weeks the S&P 500 fell, by 1.24% a week on average, CLSE averaged −0.45% and HFEQ −1.74%, so CLSE returned more in those weeks.
Which earned more than cash, CLSE or HFEQ?
Over the same weeks, CLSE finished 29.5 percentage points ahead of cash and HFEQ finished 11.2 percentage points ahead of cash. Cash here is BIL, a fund of Treasury bills.
Which is cheaper, CLSE or HFEQ?
CLSE charges 1.52% a year and HFEQ charges 0.96%, so HFEQ is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

CLSE against HFEQ, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 18, 2026. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, CLSE against HFEQ, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/alternatives/clse-vs-hfeq Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources