Data as of Nov 4, 2026.

vsOpen in the appaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Alternative ETFs

CSM vs HFEQ: Correlation to the S&P 500

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, HFEQ moved less with the S&P 500 than CSM: correlation +0.86 against +0.98.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about CSM and HFEQ

Net assets: $521m on Nov 4, 2026 for ProShares Large Cap Core Plus, and $19m on Aug 31, 2026 for Unlimited HFEQ Equity Long/Short ETF.

At a glance
+0.98
CSM correlation with the S&P 500
+0.86
HFEQ correlation with the S&P 500
90.7%
CSM down-week capture
158.3%
HFEQ down-week capture
CSM Fell 91% as much as the S&P 500
Fell 91% as much as the S&P 500CSM in the 26 weeks SPY fell, year to Nov 4, 2026: SPY averaged −1.07%, CSM −0.97%.SPY−1.07%CSM−0.97%Average week when SPY fell: 26 of 52, year to Nov 4, 2026Fell 91% as much as the S&P 500CSM in the 26 weeks SPY fell, year to Nov 4, 2026: SPY averaged −1.07%, CSM −0.97%.SPY−1.07%CSM−0.97%Average week when SPY fell

CSM in the 26 weeks SPY fell, year to Nov 4, 2026: SPY averaged −1.07%, CSM −0.97%.

HFEQ Fell more than the S&P 500
Fell more than the S&P 500HFEQ in the 26 weeks SPY fell, year to Nov 4, 2026: SPY averaged −1.07%, HFEQ −1.70%.SPY−1.07%HFEQ−1.70%Average week when SPY fell: 26 of 52, year to Nov 4, 2026Fell more than the S&P 500HFEQ in the 26 weeks SPY fell, year to Nov 4, 2026: SPY averaged −1.07%, HFEQ −1.70%.SPY−1.07%HFEQ−1.70%Average week when SPY fell

HFEQ in the 26 weeks SPY fell, year to Nov 4, 2026: SPY averaged −1.07%, HFEQ −1.70%.

Pair scorecard

CSM costs 0.51 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 3.0 points.

CSM vs HFEQ: Correlation to the S&P 500
MeasureCSMHFEQ
Return
Total return, 1 year+14.4%+11.4%
Against its benchmark
Treasury bills, 52 weeks+3.7%
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.45%0.96%
Net assets, CSM as of Nov 4, 2026 and HFEQ as of Aug 31, 2026$521m$19m
Holdings
Holdings in commonnot published
Risk
Beta to the S&P 500+0.94: about 0.94% for each 1%+1.31: about 1.31% for each 1%
Its average week when the S&P 500 fellfell 0.97%fell 1.70%

Method

Window by window

Window by window: CSM vs HFEQ: Correlation to the S&P 500
Total returnvs its benchmark
WindowCSMHFEQCSMHFEQ
3 months−1.1%−7.1%−1.0 pts vs IVV−7.0 pts vs VOO
6 months+4.9%−2.7%−0.1 pts vs IVV−7.7 pts vs VOO
1 year+14.4%+11.4%−0.4 pts vs IVV−3.4 pts vs VOO
3 years+83.6%–+0.2 pts vs IVV–
Since launchNot the same days: CSM Jul 2009 · HFEQ Jul 2025+977.7%+26.4%not measured+1.4 pts vs VOO

– means no data for this window. Open this comparison in the app →

Side by side

CSM ProShares Large Cap Core Plus · Long-short equity fund: owns stocks and sells others short, so part of its exposure to the stock market cancels out HFEQ Unlimited HFEQ Equity Long/Short ETF · Long-short equity fund: owns stocks and sells others short, so part of its exposure to the stock market cancels out
Strategy Long-short equity Long-short equity
Correlation with the S&P 500 +0.98 +0.86
Beta to the S&P 500 +0.94 +1.31
Down-week capture 90.7% 158.3%
Average week when the S&P 500 fell −0.97% −1.70%
The S&P 500 in those weeks −1.07% −1.07%
Total return, same 52 weeks +13.7% +9.5%
Against T-bills, percentage points +10.1 pts +5.8 pts
Expense ratio 0.45% 0.96%
First traded Jul 14, 2009 Jul 15, 2025
Net assets, CSM as of Nov 4, 2026 and HFEQ as of Aug 31, 2026 $521m $19m

As of Nov 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

One strategy, two funds

CSM and HFEQ both run a long-short equity strategy. Over the same 52 weeks to Nov 4, 2026, CSM’s weekly returns had a correlation of +0.98 with the S&P 500 and HFEQ’s +0.86. In the 26 weeks the index fell, by 1.07% a week on average, CSM averaged −0.97% and HFEQ −1.70%. Over the same weeks, CSM finished 10.1 percentage points ahead of cash and HFEQ finished 5.8 points ahead of cash.

Alert

CSM flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
CSM

CSM is a long-short equity fund. ETFIQ measures what every alternatives fund is sold on: whether it moves differently from the stock market. Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, its weekly returns had a correlation of +0.98 with the S&P 500’s and a beta of +0.94, so for each 1% the index moved it moved about 0.94% the same way. The S&P 500 fell in 26 of those 52 weeks, by 1.07% on average. In the same weeks CSM fell 0.97% on average, a down-week capture of 90.7%. Over the same 52 weeks CSM returned +13.7% and a Treasury bill fund +3.7%, so it finished 10.1 percentage points ahead of cash.

HFEQ

HFEQ is a long-short equity fund. Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, its weekly returns had a correlation of +0.86 with the S&P 500’s and a beta of +1.31, so for each 1% the index moved it moved about 1.31% the same way. In the same weeks HFEQ fell 1.70% on average, a down-week capture of 158.3%. Over the same 52 weeks HFEQ returned +9.5% and a Treasury bill fund +3.7%, so it finished 5.8 percentage points ahead of cash.

Questions people ask

Which moved less with the S&P 500, CSM or HFEQ?
Over the 52 weeks to Nov 4, 2026, CSM’s weekly returns had a correlation of +0.98 with the S&P 500 and HFEQ’s +0.86, so HFEQ moved less with the index.
Which did better when the S&P 500 fell, CSM or HFEQ?
In the 26 weeks the S&P 500 fell, by 1.07% a week on average, CSM averaged −0.97% and HFEQ −1.70%, so CSM returned more in those weeks.
Which earned more than cash, CSM or HFEQ?
Over the same weeks, CSM finished 10.1 percentage points ahead of cash and HFEQ finished 5.8 percentage points ahead of cash. Cash here is BIL, a fund of Treasury bills.
Which is cheaper, CSM or HFEQ?
CSM charges 0.45% a year and HFEQ charges 0.96%, so CSM is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, CSM against HFEQ, data as of Nov 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/alternatives/csm-vs-hfeq

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.