Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

CLSE vs FTLS: which moved less with stocks?

Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, CLSE moved less with the S&P 500 than FTLS: correlation +0.63 against +0.77.

Convergence Long/Short Equity ETF and First Trust Long/Short Equity.

+0.63CLSE correlation with the S&P 500
+0.77FTLS correlation with the S&P 500
36.5%CLSE down-week capture
42.3%FTLS down-week capture

ETFIQ Diversifier Score: CLSE scores higher

How much does it diversify a stock portfolio?

CLSE 44.5FTLS 38.14.8, the lowest in this set98.0, the highest

A percentile among the 63 alternatives ETFs with a full year. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All alternatives ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed

CLSEFell 37% as much as the S&P 500
SPY−1.24%CLSE−0.45%Average week when SPY fell: 22 of 52, year to Sep 18, 2026SPY−1.24%CLSE−0.45%Average week when SPY fell
FTLSFell 42% as much as the S&P 500
SPY−1.24%FTLS−0.52%Average week when SPY fell: 22 of 52, year to Sep 18, 2026SPY−1.24%FTLS−0.52%Average week when SPY fell

One strategy, two funds

CLSE and FTLS both run a long-short equity strategy. Over the same 52 weeks to Sep 18, 2026, CLSE’s weekly returns had a correlation of +0.63 with the S&P 500 and FTLS’s +0.77. In the 22 weeks the index fell, by 1.24% a week on average, CLSE averaged −0.45% and FTLS −0.52%. Over the same weeks, CLSE finished 29.5 percentage points ahead of cash and FTLS finished 7.7 points ahead of cash.

Performance, window by window

CLSE and FTLS over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnvs the S&P 500
CLSEFTLSCLSEFTLS
3 months+0.8%+3.2%−1.4 pts+0.9 pts
6 months+23.0%+10.9%+5.0 pts−7.1 pts
1 year+33.9%+11.9%+17.4 pts−4.7 pts
3 years+118.0%+47.7%+39.6 pts−30.7 pts
Since launch+134.6%+183.9%+45.6 pts−183.2 pts
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
CLSE and FTLS on the same fields, as of Sep 18, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
CLSE
Convergence Long/Short Equity ETF
Long-short equity fund: owns stocks and sells others short, so part of its exposure to the stock market cancels out
FTLS
First Trust Long/Short Equity
Long-short equity fund: owns stocks and sells others short, so part of its exposure to the stock market cancels out
IssuerConvergenceFirst Trust
StrategyLong-short equityLong-short equity
Correlation with the S&P 500+0.63+0.77
Beta to the S&P 500+0.64+0.44
Down-week capture36.5%42.3%
Average week when the S&P 500 fell−0.45%−0.52%
The S&P 500 in those weeks−1.24%−1.24%
Total return, same 52 weeks+33.1%+11.4%
Against T-bills, percentage points+29.5 pts+7.7 pts
Expense ratio1.52%1.38%
ListedFeb 22, 2022Sep 10, 2014
Net assets$614m$2.6bn

CLSE in plain words

CLSE is a long-short equity fund. ETFIQ measures what every alternatives fund is sold on: whether it moves differently from the stock market. Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, its weekly returns had a correlation of +0.63 with the S&P 500’s and a beta of +0.64, so for each 1% the index moved it moved about 0.64% the same way. The S&P 500 fell in 22 of those 52 weeks, by 1.24% on average. In the same weeks CLSE fell 0.45% on average, a down-week capture of 36.5%. Over the same 52 weeks CLSE returned +33.1% and a Treasury bill fund +3.6%, so it finished 29.5 percentage points ahead of cash.

FTLS in plain words

FTLS is a long-short equity fund. Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, its weekly returns had a correlation of +0.77 with the S&P 500’s and a beta of +0.44, so for each 1% the index moved it moved about 0.44% the same way. In the same weeks FTLS fell 0.52% on average, a down-week capture of 42.3%. Over the same 52 weeks FTLS returned +11.4% and a Treasury bill fund +3.6%, so it finished 7.7 percentage points ahead of cash.

Questions people ask

Which moved less with the S&P 500, CLSE or FTLS?
Over the 52 weeks to Sep 18, 2026, CLSE’s weekly returns had a correlation of +0.63 with the S&P 500 and FTLS’s +0.77, so CLSE moved less with the index.
Which did better when the S&P 500 fell, CLSE or FTLS?
In the 22 weeks the S&P 500 fell, by 1.24% a week on average, CLSE averaged −0.45% and FTLS −0.52%, so CLSE returned more in those weeks.
Which earned more than cash, CLSE or FTLS?
Over the same weeks, CLSE finished 29.5 percentage points ahead of cash and FTLS finished 7.7 percentage points ahead of cash. Cash here is BIL, a fund of Treasury bills.
Which is cheaper, CLSE or FTLS?
CLSE charges 1.52% a year and FTLS charges 1.38%, so FTLS is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

CLSE against FTLS, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 18, 2026. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, CLSE against FTLS, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/alternatives/clse-vs-ftls Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources