Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

CLSE vs EHLS: which moved less with stocks?

Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, EHLS moved less with the S&P 500 than CLSE: correlation +0.55 against +0.63.

Convergence Long/Short Equity ETF and Even Herd Long Short ETF.

+0.63CLSE correlation with the S&P 500
+0.55EHLS correlation with the S&P 500
36.5%CLSE down-week capture
38.3%EHLS down-week capture

ETFIQ Diversifier Score: EHLS scores higher

How much does it diversify a stock portfolio?

CLSE 44.5EHLS 464.8, the lowest in this set98.0, the highest

A percentile among the 63 alternatives ETFs with a full year. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All alternatives ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed

CLSEFell 37% as much as the S&P 500
SPY−1.24%CLSE−0.45%Average week when SPY fell: 22 of 52, year to Sep 18, 2026SPY−1.24%CLSE−0.45%Average week when SPY fell
EHLSFell 38% as much as the S&P 500
SPY−1.24%EHLS−0.47%Average week when SPY fell: 22 of 52, year to Sep 18, 2026SPY−1.24%EHLS−0.47%Average week when SPY fell

One strategy, two funds

CLSE and EHLS both run a long-short equity strategy. Over the same 52 weeks to Sep 18, 2026, CLSE’s weekly returns had a correlation of +0.63 with the S&P 500 and EHLS’s +0.55. In the 22 weeks the index fell, by 1.24% a week on average, CLSE averaged −0.45% and EHLS −0.47%. Over the same weeks, CLSE finished 29.5 percentage points ahead of cash and EHLS finished 6.2 points ahead of cash.

Performance, window by window

CLSE and EHLS over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnvs the S&P 500
CLSEEHLSCLSEEHLS
3 months+0.8%−4.1%−1.4 pts−6.3 pts
6 months+23.0%+5.3%+5.0 pts−12.7 pts
1 year+33.9%+11.3%+17.4 pts−5.3 pts
3 years+118.0%not published+39.6 ptsnot published
Since launch+134.6%+30.3%+45.6 pts−20.9 pts
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
CLSE and EHLS on the same fields, as of Sep 18, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
CLSE
Convergence Long/Short Equity ETF
Long-short equity fund: owns stocks and sells others short, so part of its exposure to the stock market cancels out
EHLS
Even Herd Long Short ETF
Long-short equity fund: owns stocks and sells others short, so part of its exposure to the stock market cancels out
IssuerConvergenceEven Herd
StrategyLong-short equityLong-short equity
Correlation with the S&P 500+0.63+0.55
Beta to the S&P 500+0.64+0.58
Down-week capture36.5%38.3%
Average week when the S&P 500 fell−0.45%−0.47%
The S&P 500 in those weeks−1.24%−1.24%
Total return, same 52 weeks+33.1%+9.8%
Against T-bills, percentage points+29.5 pts+6.2 pts
Expense ratio1.52%3.35%
ListedFeb 22, 2022Apr 2, 2024
Net assets$614m$61m

CLSE in plain words

CLSE is a long-short equity fund. ETFIQ measures what every alternatives fund is sold on: whether it moves differently from the stock market. Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, its weekly returns had a correlation of +0.63 with the S&P 500’s and a beta of +0.64, so for each 1% the index moved it moved about 0.64% the same way. The S&P 500 fell in 22 of those 52 weeks, by 1.24% on average. In the same weeks CLSE fell 0.45% on average, a down-week capture of 36.5%. Over the same 52 weeks CLSE returned +33.1% and a Treasury bill fund +3.6%, so it finished 29.5 percentage points ahead of cash.

EHLS in plain words

EHLS is a long-short equity fund. Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, its weekly returns had a correlation of +0.55 with the S&P 500’s and a beta of +0.58, so for each 1% the index moved it moved about 0.58% the same way. In the same weeks EHLS fell 0.47% on average, a down-week capture of 38.3%. Over the same 52 weeks EHLS returned +9.8% and a Treasury bill fund +3.6%, so it finished 6.2 percentage points ahead of cash.

Questions people ask

Which moved less with the S&P 500, CLSE or EHLS?
Over the 52 weeks to Sep 18, 2026, CLSE’s weekly returns had a correlation of +0.63 with the S&P 500 and EHLS’s +0.55, so EHLS moved less with the index.
Which did better when the S&P 500 fell, CLSE or EHLS?
In the 22 weeks the S&P 500 fell, by 1.24% a week on average, CLSE averaged −0.45% and EHLS −0.47%, so CLSE returned more in those weeks.
Which earned more than cash, CLSE or EHLS?
Over the same weeks, CLSE finished 29.5 percentage points ahead of cash and EHLS finished 6.2 percentage points ahead of cash. Cash here is BIL, a fund of Treasury bills.
Which is cheaper, CLSE or EHLS?
CLSE charges 1.52% a year and EHLS charges 3.35%, so CLSE is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

CLSE against EHLS, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 18, 2026. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, CLSE against EHLS, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/alternatives/clse-vs-ehls Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources