Data as of Nov 4, 2026.

vsOpen in the appCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Alternative ETFs

EHLS vs FFLS: Correlation to the S&P 500

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, FFLS moved less with the S&P 500 than EHLS: correlation +0.65 against +0.69.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about EHLS and FFLS

Net assets: $61m on Jun 30, 2026 for Even Herd Long Short ETF, and $43m on Aug 31, 2026 for The Future Fund Long/Short ETF.

At a glance
+0.69
EHLS correlation with the S&P 500
+0.65
FFLS correlation with the S&P 500
123.5%
EHLS down-week capture
65.7%
FFLS down-week capture
EHLS Fell more than the S&P 500
Fell more than the S&P 500EHLS in the 26 weeks SPY fell, year to Nov 4, 2026: SPY averaged −1.07%, EHLS −1.32%.SPY−1.07%EHLS−1.32%Average week when SPY fell: 26 of 52, year to Nov 4, 2026Fell more than the S&P 500EHLS in the 26 weeks SPY fell, year to Nov 4, 2026: SPY averaged −1.07%, EHLS −1.32%.SPY−1.07%EHLS−1.32%Average week when SPY fell

EHLS in the 26 weeks SPY fell, year to Nov 4, 2026: SPY averaged −1.07%, EHLS −1.32%.

FFLS Fell 66% as much as the S&P 500
Fell 66% as much as the S&P 500FFLS in the 26 weeks SPY fell, year to Nov 4, 2026: SPY averaged −1.07%, FFLS −0.70%.SPY−1.07%FFLS−0.70%Average week when SPY fell: 26 of 52, year to Nov 4, 2026Fell 66% as much as the S&P 500FFLS in the 26 weeks SPY fell, year to Nov 4, 2026: SPY averaged −1.07%, FFLS −0.70%.SPY−1.07%FFLS−0.70%Average week when SPY fell

FFLS in the 26 weeks SPY fell, year to Nov 4, 2026: SPY averaged −1.07%, FFLS −0.70%.

Pair scorecard

FFLS costs 2.11 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 1.4 points.

EHLS vs FFLS: Correlation to the S&P 500
MeasureEHLSFFLS
Return
Total return, 1 year+1.3%−0.1%
Against its benchmark
Treasury bills, 52 weeks+3.7%
Cost and size
Expense ratio3.35%1.24%
Net assets, EHLS as of Jun 30, 2026 and FFLS as of Aug 31, 2026$61m$43m
Holdings
Holdings in commonnot published
Risk
Beta to the S&P 500+0.91: about 0.91% for each 1%+0.61: about 0.61% for each 1%
Its average week when the S&P 500 fellfell 1.32%fell 0.70%

Method

Window by window

Window by window: EHLS vs FFLS: Correlation to the S&P 500
Total returnvs its benchmark
WindowEHLSFFLSEHLSFFLS
3 months−10.0%−0.3%−9.9 pts vs VOOnot measured
6 months−13.8%+2.6%−18.8 pts vs VOOnot measured
1 year+1.3%−0.1%−13.5 pts vs VOOnot measured
3 years–+36.0%–not measured
Since launchNot the same days: EHLS Apr 2024 · FFLS Jun 2023+19.2%+30.5%−33.2 pts vs VOOnot measured

– means no data for this window. Open this comparison in the app →

Side by side

EHLS Even Herd Long Short ETF · Long-short equity fund: owns stocks and sells others short, so part of its exposure to the stock market cancels out FFLS The Future Fund Long/Short ETF · Long-short equity fund: owns stocks and sells others short, so part of its exposure to the stock market cancels out
Issuer Even Herd The Future Fund
Strategy Long-short equity Long-short equity
Correlation with the S&P 500 +0.69 +0.65
Beta to the S&P 500 +0.91 +0.61
Down-week capture 123.5% 65.7%
Average week when the S&P 500 fell −1.32% −0.70%
The S&P 500 in those weeks −1.07% −1.07%
Total return, same 52 weeks +0.5% +1.3%
Against T-bills, percentage points −3.2 pts −2.4 pts
Expense ratio 3.35% 1.24%
First traded Apr 2, 2024 Jun 21, 2023
Net assets, EHLS as of Jun 30, 2026 and FFLS as of Aug 31, 2026 $61m $43m

As of Nov 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

One strategy, two funds

EHLS and FFLS both run a long-short equity strategy. Over the same 52 weeks to Nov 4, 2026, EHLS’s weekly returns had a correlation of +0.69 with the S&P 500 and FFLS’s +0.65. In the 26 weeks the index fell, by 1.07% a week on average, EHLS averaged −1.32% and FFLS −0.70%. Over the same weeks, EHLS finished 3.2 percentage points behind cash and FFLS finished 2.4 points behind cash.

Alert

The week's ETF fund flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
EHLS

EHLS is a long-short equity fund. ETFIQ measures what every alternatives fund is sold on: whether it moves differently from the stock market. Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, its weekly returns had a correlation of +0.69 with the S&P 500’s and a beta of +0.91, so for each 1% the index moved it moved about 0.91% the same way. The S&P 500 fell in 26 of those 52 weeks, by 1.07% on average. In the same weeks EHLS fell 1.32% on average, a down-week capture of 123.5%. Over the same 52 weeks EHLS returned +0.5% and a Treasury bill fund +3.7%, so it finished 3.2 percentage points behind cash.

FFLS

FFLS is a long-short equity fund. Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, its weekly returns had a correlation of +0.65 with the S&P 500’s and a beta of +0.61, so for each 1% the index moved it moved about 0.61% the same way. In the same weeks FFLS fell 0.70% on average, a down-week capture of 65.7%. Over the same 52 weeks FFLS returned +1.3% and a Treasury bill fund +3.7%, so it finished 2.4 percentage points behind cash.

Questions people ask

Which moved less with the S&P 500, EHLS or FFLS?
Over the 52 weeks to Nov 4, 2026, EHLS’s weekly returns had a correlation of +0.69 with the S&P 500 and FFLS’s +0.65, so FFLS moved less with the index.
Which did better when the S&P 500 fell, EHLS or FFLS?
In the 26 weeks the S&P 500 fell, by 1.07% a week on average, EHLS averaged −1.32% and FFLS −0.70%, so FFLS returned more in those weeks.
Which earned more than cash, EHLS or FFLS?
Over the same weeks, EHLS finished 3.2 percentage points behind cash and FFLS finished 2.4 percentage points behind cash. Cash here is BIL, a fund of Treasury bills.
Which is cheaper, EHLS or FFLS?
EHLS charges 3.35% a year and FFLS charges 1.24%, so FFLS is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, EHLS against FFLS, data as of Nov 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/alternatives/ehls-vs-ffls

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.