Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

FFLS vs LSEQ: which moved less with stocks?

Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, LSEQ moved less with the S&P 500 than FFLS: correlation +0.05 against +0.69.

The Future Fund Long/Short ETF and Harbor Long-Short Equity ETF.

+0.69FFLS correlation with the S&P 500
+0.05LSEQ correlation with the S&P 500
84.7%FFLS down-week capture
−48.0%LSEQ down-week capture

ETFIQ Diversifier Score: LSEQ scores higher

How much does it diversify a stock portfolio?

FFLS 27.8LSEQ 88.14.8, the lowest in this set98.0, the highest

A percentile among the 63 alternatives ETFs with a full year. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All alternatives ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed

FFLSFell 85% as much as the S&P 500
SPY−1.24%FFLS−1.05%Average week when SPY fell: 22 of 52, year to Sep 18, 2026SPY−1.24%FFLS−1.05%Average week when SPY fell
LSEQRose when the S&P 500 fell
SPY−1.24%LSEQ+0.59%Average week when SPY fell: 22 of 52, year to Sep 18, 2026SPY−1.24%LSEQ+0.59%Average week when SPY fell

One strategy, two funds

FFLS and LSEQ both run a long-short equity strategy. Over the same 52 weeks to Sep 18, 2026, FFLS’s weekly returns had a correlation of +0.69 with the S&P 500 and LSEQ’s +0.05. In the 22 weeks the index fell, by 1.24% a week on average, FFLS averaged −1.05% and LSEQ +0.59%. Over the same weeks, FFLS finished 8.3 percentage points behind cash and LSEQ finished 19.2 points ahead of cash.

Performance, window by window

FFLS and LSEQ over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnvs the S&P 500
FFLSLSEQFFLSLSEQ
3 months+0.6%−3.8%−1.7 pts−6.1 pts
6 months+4.9%+7.4%−13.1 pts−10.6 pts
1 year−5.0%+23.2%−21.6 pts+6.6 pts
3 years+28.9%not published−49.5 ptsnot published
Since launch+28.6%+42.9%−53.6 pts−30.0 pts
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
FFLS and LSEQ on the same fields, as of Sep 18, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
FFLS
The Future Fund Long/Short ETF
Long-short equity fund: owns stocks and sells others short, so part of its exposure to the stock market cancels out
LSEQ
Harbor Long-Short Equity ETF
Long-short equity fund: owns stocks and sells others short, so part of its exposure to the stock market cancels out
IssuerThe Future FundHarbor
StrategyLong-short equityLong-short equity
Correlation with the S&P 500+0.69+0.05
Beta to the S&P 500+0.64+0.07
Down-week capture84.7%−48.0%
Average week when the S&P 500 fell−1.05%+0.59%
The S&P 500 in those weeks−1.24%−1.24%
Total return, same 52 weeks−4.7%+22.8%
Against T-bills, percentage points−8.3 pts+19.2 pts
Expense ratio1.24%2.28%
ListedJun 21, 2023Dec 4, 2023
Net assets$43m$16m

FFLS in plain words

FFLS is a long-short equity fund. ETFIQ measures what every alternatives fund is sold on: whether it moves differently from the stock market. Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, its weekly returns had a correlation of +0.69 with the S&P 500’s and a beta of +0.64, so for each 1% the index moved it moved about 0.64% the same way. The S&P 500 fell in 22 of those 52 weeks, by 1.24% on average. In the same weeks FFLS fell 1.05% on average, a down-week capture of 84.7%. Over the same 52 weeks FFLS returned −4.7% and a Treasury bill fund +3.6%, so it finished 8.3 percentage points behind cash.

LSEQ in plain words

LSEQ is a long-short equity fund. Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, its weekly returns had a correlation of +0.05 with the S&P 500’s and a beta of +0.07, so for each 1% the index moved it moved about 0.07% the same way. In the same weeks LSEQ rose 0.59% on average, a down-week capture of −48.0%. Over the same 52 weeks LSEQ returned +22.8% and a Treasury bill fund +3.6%, so it finished 19.2 percentage points ahead of cash.

Questions people ask

Which moved less with the S&P 500, FFLS or LSEQ?
Over the 52 weeks to Sep 18, 2026, FFLS’s weekly returns had a correlation of +0.69 with the S&P 500 and LSEQ’s +0.05, so LSEQ moved less with the index.
Which did better when the S&P 500 fell, FFLS or LSEQ?
In the 22 weeks the S&P 500 fell, by 1.24% a week on average, FFLS averaged −1.05% and LSEQ +0.59%, so LSEQ returned more in those weeks.
Which earned more than cash, FFLS or LSEQ?
Over the same weeks, FFLS finished 8.3 percentage points behind cash and LSEQ finished 19.2 percentage points ahead of cash. Cash here is BIL, a fund of Treasury bills.
Which is cheaper, FFLS or LSEQ?
FFLS charges 1.24% a year and LSEQ charges 2.28%, so FFLS is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

FFLS against LSEQ, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 18, 2026. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, FFLS against LSEQ, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/alternatives/ffls-vs-lseq Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources