Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

CBLS vs HFEQ: which moved less with stocks?

Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, CBLS moved less with the S&P 500 than HFEQ: correlation +0.36 against +0.82.

Clough Hedged Equity ETF and Unlimited HFEQ Equity Long/Short ETF.

+0.36CBLS correlation with the S&P 500
+0.82HFEQ correlation with the S&P 500
14.5%CBLS down-week capture
139.9%HFEQ down-week capture

ETFIQ Diversifier Score: CBLS scores higher

How much does it diversify a stock portfolio?

CBLS 58.7HFEQ 16.64.8, the lowest in this set98.0, the highest

A percentile among the 63 alternatives ETFs with a full year. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All alternatives ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed

CBLSFell 15% as much as the S&P 500
SPY−1.24%CBLS−0.18%Average week when SPY fell: 22 of 52, year to Sep 18, 2026SPY−1.24%CBLS−0.18%Average week when SPY fell
HFEQFell more than the S&P 500
SPY−1.24%HFEQ−1.74%Average week when SPY fell: 22 of 52, year to Sep 18, 2026SPY−1.24%HFEQ−1.74%Average week when SPY fell

One strategy, two funds

CBLS and HFEQ both run a long-short equity strategy. Over the same 52 weeks to Sep 18, 2026, CBLS’s weekly returns had a correlation of +0.36 with the S&P 500 and HFEQ’s +0.82. In the 22 weeks the index fell, by 1.24% a week on average, CBLS averaged −0.18% and HFEQ −1.74%. Over the same weeks, CBLS finished 5.7 percentage points ahead of cash and HFEQ finished 11.2 points ahead of cash.

Performance, window by window

CBLS and HFEQ over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnvs the S&P 500
CBLSHFEQCBLSHFEQ
3 months−7.1%−4.9%−9.3 pts−7.2 pts
6 months+7.6%+13.2%−10.4 pts−4.8 pts
1 year+9.9%+14.8%−6.7 pts−1.8 pts
3 years+64.1%not published−14.3 ptsnot published
Since launch+55.5%+27.8%−75.2 pts+3.7 pts
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
CBLS and HFEQ on the same fields, as of Sep 18, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
CBLS
Clough Hedged Equity ETF
Long-short equity fund: owns stocks and sells others short, so part of its exposure to the stock market cancels out
HFEQ
Unlimited HFEQ Equity Long/Short ETF
Long-short equity fund: owns stocks and sells others short, so part of its exposure to the stock market cancels out
IssuerCloughUnlimited
StrategyLong-short equityLong-short equity
Correlation with the S&P 500+0.36+0.82
Beta to the S&P 500+0.40+1.32
Down-week capture14.5%139.9%
Average week when the S&P 500 fell−0.18%−1.74%
The S&P 500 in those weeks−1.24%−1.24%
Total return, same 52 weeks+9.3%+14.8%
Against T-bills, percentage points+5.7 pts+11.2 pts
Expense ratio1.89%0.96%
ListedNov 13, 2020Jul 15, 2025
Net assets$53m$16m

CBLS in plain words

CBLS is a long-short equity fund. ETFIQ measures what every alternatives fund is sold on: whether it moves differently from the stock market. Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, its weekly returns had a correlation of +0.36 with the S&P 500’s and a beta of +0.40, so for each 1% the index moved it moved about 0.40% the same way. The S&P 500 fell in 22 of those 52 weeks, by 1.24% on average. In the same weeks CBLS fell 0.18% on average, a down-week capture of 14.5%. Over the same 52 weeks CBLS returned +9.3% and a Treasury bill fund +3.6%, so it finished 5.7 percentage points ahead of cash.

HFEQ in plain words

HFEQ is a long-short equity fund. Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, its weekly returns had a correlation of +0.82 with the S&P 500’s and a beta of +1.32, so for each 1% the index moved it moved about 1.32% the same way. In the same weeks HFEQ fell 1.74% on average, a down-week capture of 139.9%. Over the same 52 weeks HFEQ returned +14.8% and a Treasury bill fund +3.6%, so it finished 11.2 percentage points ahead of cash.

Questions people ask

Which moved less with the S&P 500, CBLS or HFEQ?
Over the 52 weeks to Sep 18, 2026, CBLS’s weekly returns had a correlation of +0.36 with the S&P 500 and HFEQ’s +0.82, so CBLS moved less with the index.
Which did better when the S&P 500 fell, CBLS or HFEQ?
In the 22 weeks the S&P 500 fell, by 1.24% a week on average, CBLS averaged −0.18% and HFEQ −1.74%, so CBLS returned more in those weeks.
Which earned more than cash, CBLS or HFEQ?
Over the same weeks, CBLS finished 5.7 percentage points ahead of cash and HFEQ finished 11.2 percentage points ahead of cash. Cash here is BIL, a fund of Treasury bills.
Which is cheaper, CBLS or HFEQ?
CBLS charges 1.89% a year and HFEQ charges 0.96%, so HFEQ is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

CBLS against HFEQ, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 18, 2026. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, CBLS against HFEQ, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/alternatives/cbls-vs-hfeq Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources