Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

CBLS vs FTLS: which moved less with stocks?

Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, CBLS moved less with the S&P 500 than FTLS: correlation +0.36 against +0.77.

Clough Hedged Equity ETF and First Trust Long/Short Equity.

+0.36CBLS correlation with the S&P 500
+0.77FTLS correlation with the S&P 500
14.5%CBLS down-week capture
42.3%FTLS down-week capture

ETFIQ Diversifier Score: CBLS scores higher

How much does it diversify a stock portfolio?

CBLS 58.7FTLS 38.14.8, the lowest in this set98.0, the highest

A percentile among the 63 alternatives ETFs with a full year. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All alternatives ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed

CBLSFell 15% as much as the S&P 500
SPY−1.24%CBLS−0.18%Average week when SPY fell: 22 of 52, year to Sep 18, 2026SPY−1.24%CBLS−0.18%Average week when SPY fell
FTLSFell 42% as much as the S&P 500
SPY−1.24%FTLS−0.52%Average week when SPY fell: 22 of 52, year to Sep 18, 2026SPY−1.24%FTLS−0.52%Average week when SPY fell

One strategy, two funds

CBLS and FTLS both run a long-short equity strategy. Over the same 52 weeks to Sep 18, 2026, CBLS’s weekly returns had a correlation of +0.36 with the S&P 500 and FTLS’s +0.77. In the 22 weeks the index fell, by 1.24% a week on average, CBLS averaged −0.18% and FTLS −0.52%. Over the same weeks, CBLS finished 5.7 percentage points ahead of cash and FTLS finished 7.7 points ahead of cash.

Performance, window by window

CBLS and FTLS over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnvs the S&P 500
CBLSFTLSCBLSFTLS
3 months−7.1%+3.2%−9.3 pts+0.9 pts
6 months+7.6%+10.9%−10.4 pts−7.1 pts
1 year+9.9%+11.9%−6.7 pts−4.7 pts
3 years+64.1%+47.7%−14.3 pts−30.7 pts
Since launch+55.5%+183.9%−75.2 pts−183.2 pts
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
CBLS and FTLS on the same fields, as of Sep 18, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
CBLS
Clough Hedged Equity ETF
Long-short equity fund: owns stocks and sells others short, so part of its exposure to the stock market cancels out
FTLS
First Trust Long/Short Equity
Long-short equity fund: owns stocks and sells others short, so part of its exposure to the stock market cancels out
IssuerCloughFirst Trust
StrategyLong-short equityLong-short equity
Correlation with the S&P 500+0.36+0.77
Beta to the S&P 500+0.40+0.44
Down-week capture14.5%42.3%
Average week when the S&P 500 fell−0.18%−0.52%
The S&P 500 in those weeks−1.24%−1.24%
Total return, same 52 weeks+9.3%+11.4%
Against T-bills, percentage points+5.7 pts+7.7 pts
Expense ratio1.89%1.38%
ListedNov 13, 2020Sep 10, 2014
Net assets$53m$2.6bn

CBLS in plain words

CBLS is a long-short equity fund. ETFIQ measures what every alternatives fund is sold on: whether it moves differently from the stock market. Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, its weekly returns had a correlation of +0.36 with the S&P 500’s and a beta of +0.40, so for each 1% the index moved it moved about 0.40% the same way. The S&P 500 fell in 22 of those 52 weeks, by 1.24% on average. In the same weeks CBLS fell 0.18% on average, a down-week capture of 14.5%. Over the same 52 weeks CBLS returned +9.3% and a Treasury bill fund +3.6%, so it finished 5.7 percentage points ahead of cash.

FTLS in plain words

FTLS is a long-short equity fund. Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, its weekly returns had a correlation of +0.77 with the S&P 500’s and a beta of +0.44, so for each 1% the index moved it moved about 0.44% the same way. In the same weeks FTLS fell 0.52% on average, a down-week capture of 42.3%. Over the same 52 weeks FTLS returned +11.4% and a Treasury bill fund +3.6%, so it finished 7.7 percentage points ahead of cash.

Questions people ask

Which moved less with the S&P 500, CBLS or FTLS?
Over the 52 weeks to Sep 18, 2026, CBLS’s weekly returns had a correlation of +0.36 with the S&P 500 and FTLS’s +0.77, so CBLS moved less with the index.
Which did better when the S&P 500 fell, CBLS or FTLS?
In the 22 weeks the S&P 500 fell, by 1.24% a week on average, CBLS averaged −0.18% and FTLS −0.52%, so CBLS returned more in those weeks.
Which earned more than cash, CBLS or FTLS?
Over the same weeks, CBLS finished 5.7 percentage points ahead of cash and FTLS finished 7.7 percentage points ahead of cash. Cash here is BIL, a fund of Treasury bills.
Which is cheaper, CBLS or FTLS?
CBLS charges 1.89% a year and FTLS charges 1.38%, so FTLS is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

CBLS against FTLS, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 18, 2026. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, CBLS against FTLS, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/alternatives/cbls-vs-ftls Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources