Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

CBLS vs CSM: which moved less with stocks?

Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, CBLS moved less with the S&P 500 than CSM: correlation +0.36 against +0.98.

Clough Hedged Equity ETF and ProShares Large Cap Core Plus.

+0.36CBLS correlation with the S&P 500
+0.98CSM correlation with the S&P 500
14.5%CBLS down-week capture
99.9%CSM down-week capture

ETFIQ Diversifier Score: CBLS scores higher

How much does it diversify a stock portfolio?

CBLS 58.7CSM 4.84.8, the lowest in this set98.0, the highest

A percentile among the 63 alternatives ETFs with a full year. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All alternatives ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed

CBLSFell 15% as much as the S&P 500
SPY−1.24%CBLS−0.18%Average week when SPY fell: 22 of 52, year to Sep 18, 2026SPY−1.24%CBLS−0.18%Average week when SPY fell
CSMFell with the S&P 500
SPY−1.24%CSM−1.24%Average week when SPY fell: 22 of 52, year to Sep 18, 2026SPY−1.24%CSM−1.24%Average week when SPY fell

One strategy, two funds

CBLS and CSM both run a long-short equity strategy. Over the same 52 weeks to Sep 18, 2026, CBLS’s weekly returns had a correlation of +0.36 with the S&P 500 and CSM’s +0.98. In the 22 weeks the index fell, by 1.24% a week on average, CBLS averaged −0.18% and CSM −1.24%. Over the same weeks, CBLS finished 5.7 percentage points ahead of cash and CSM finished 12.1 points ahead of cash.

Performance, window by window

CBLS and CSM over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnvs the S&P 500
CBLSCSMCBLSCSM
3 months−7.1%+2.3%−9.3 pts+0.1 pts
6 months+7.6%+17.7%−10.4 pts−0.3 pts
1 year+9.9%+16.4%−6.7 pts−0.2 pts
3 years+64.1%+78.8%−14.3 pts+0.3 pts
Since launch+55.5%+741.0%−75.2 pts−62.6 pts
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
CBLS and CSM on the same fields, as of Sep 18, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
CBLS
Clough Hedged Equity ETF
Long-short equity fund: owns stocks and sells others short, so part of its exposure to the stock market cancels out
CSM
ProShares Large Cap Core Plus
Long-short equity fund: owns stocks and sells others short, so part of its exposure to the stock market cancels out
IssuerCloughProShares
StrategyLong-short equityLong-short equity
Correlation with the S&P 500+0.36+0.98
Beta to the S&P 500+0.40+0.97
Down-week capture14.5%99.9%
Average week when the S&P 500 fell−0.18%−1.24%
The S&P 500 in those weeks−1.24%−1.24%
Total return, same 52 weeks+9.3%+15.7%
Against T-bills, percentage points+5.7 pts+12.1 pts
Expense ratio1.89%0.45%
ListedNov 13, 2020Jan 4, 2010
Net assets$53m$520m

CBLS in plain words

CBLS is a long-short equity fund. ETFIQ measures what every alternatives fund is sold on: whether it moves differently from the stock market. Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, its weekly returns had a correlation of +0.36 with the S&P 500’s and a beta of +0.40, so for each 1% the index moved it moved about 0.40% the same way. The S&P 500 fell in 22 of those 52 weeks, by 1.24% on average. In the same weeks CBLS fell 0.18% on average, a down-week capture of 14.5%. Over the same 52 weeks CBLS returned +9.3% and a Treasury bill fund +3.6%, so it finished 5.7 percentage points ahead of cash.

CSM in plain words

CSM is a long-short equity fund. Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, its weekly returns had a correlation of +0.98 with the S&P 500’s and a beta of +0.97, so for each 1% the index moved it moved about 0.97% the same way. In the same weeks CSM fell 1.24% on average, a down-week capture of 99.9%. Over the same 52 weeks CSM returned +15.7% and a Treasury bill fund +3.6%, so it finished 12.1 percentage points ahead of cash.

Questions people ask

Which moved less with the S&P 500, CBLS or CSM?
Over the 52 weeks to Sep 18, 2026, CBLS’s weekly returns had a correlation of +0.36 with the S&P 500 and CSM’s +0.98, so CBLS moved less with the index.
Which did better when the S&P 500 fell, CBLS or CSM?
In the 22 weeks the S&P 500 fell, by 1.24% a week on average, CBLS averaged −0.18% and CSM −1.24%, so CBLS returned more in those weeks.
Which earned more than cash, CBLS or CSM?
Over the same weeks, CBLS finished 5.7 percentage points ahead of cash and CSM finished 12.1 percentage points ahead of cash. Cash here is BIL, a fund of Treasury bills.
Which is cheaper, CBLS or CSM?
CBLS charges 1.89% a year and CSM charges 0.45%, so CSM is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

CBLS against CSM, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 18, 2026. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, CBLS against CSM, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/alternatives/cbls-vs-csm Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources