ETFIQ
RankingsCompareHoldingsResearch
My portfolioWeekly note

XNDX Tradr 2X Long XNDU Daily ETF

Aims to return twice the daily move of Xanadu Quantum Technologies (XNDU)Tradr1.49% fee$3mSince May 7, 2026SEC filings ↗
Share on XDownload as PDFCompareAdd to portfolioAlerts

Three months to Oct 2, 2026: XNDX returned −89.3% where its own daily promise gave −88.8%, 0.5 points short.

−63.0%
What XNDU did
−88.8%
What 2 times a day gives
−89.3%
What the fund returned
−0.5 pts
The fund itself cost
What it aimed at, and what it did
30 pts ahead of its stated multipleXNDX returned −83.5% while 2 times XNDU's move would have been −113.5%XNDU −56.7% ×2 implies−113.5%XNDX returned−83.5%30 pts ahead of its stated multipleXNDX returned −83.5% while 2 times XNDU's move would have been −113.5%XNDU −56.7% ×2 implies−113.5%XNDX returned−83.5%

Over the 1 month to Oct 2, 2026, XNDX returned −83.5%, where 2 times that move implies −113.5%. The difference is +30.0 pts.

36.7 pts ahead of its stated multipleXNDX returned −89.3% while 2 times XNDU's move would have been −126.0%XNDU −63.0% ×2 implies−126.0%XNDX returned−89.3%36.7 pts ahead of its stated multipleXNDX returned −89.3% while 2 times XNDU's move would have been −126.0%XNDU −63.0% ×2 implies−126.0%XNDX returned−89.3%

Over the 3 months to Oct 2, 2026, XNDX returned −89.3%, where 2 times that move implies −126.0%. The difference is +36.7 pts.

54.3 pts ahead of its stated multipleXNDX returned −96.3% while 2 times XNDU's move would have been −150.5%XNDU −75.3% ×2 implies−150.5%XNDX returned−96.3%54.3 pts ahead of its stated multipleXNDX returned −96.3% while 2 times XNDU's move would have been −150.5%XNDU −75.3% ×2 implies−150.5%XNDX returned−96.3%

Over the since launch to Oct 2, 2026, XNDX returned −96.3%, where 2 times that move implies −150.5%. The difference is +54.3 pts.

ETFIQ Decay Resistance Score
98.48th of 470

XNDX finished 0.5 points short of what +2 times XNDU’s daily move would have given, compounded through the same days.

points against its own daily promise, compounded−0.5 pts · 98th pct
All 470 ranked by this score →How it is computed →

Did it keep up with its own daily multiple, compounded day by day?

Points against its own daily promise, compounded
BMNG −19.3 ptsBMNU −19.3 ptsMRNX −18.1 ptsSMCX −15.6 ptsMSTX −14.9 ptsSMCC −14.7 ptsMSTU −13.9 ptsMSTP −11.7 ptsSMCL −11.2 ptsSBTU −10.9 ptsPOEL −10.4 ptsXOVL −10.1 ptsGMEU −9.5 ptsETHT −9.4 ptsINFH −9.4 ptsONDL −9.4 ptsGDXU −9.2 ptsLITU −9.0 ptsAXTU −8.8 ptsMSTC −8.8 ptsEUVX −8.4 ptsIRE −8.4 ptsSOLT −8.2 ptsXXRP −8.1 ptsKORU −7.8 ptsUMAL −7.8 ptsSLON −7.7 ptsSOUX −7.7 ptsAXTX −7.5 ptsBLSG −7.5 ptsEVMU −7.5 ptsHPEL −7.5 ptsSPYU −7.5 ptsCRWL −7.3 ptsAXTL −7.1 ptsDJTU −7.1 ptsAMPU −7.0 ptsDRAL −6.8 ptsPLTA −6.8 ptsAEHG −6.7 ptsNETG −6.7 ptsRGTX −6.7 ptsGEMG −6.6 ptsOKTG −6.6 ptsPLTG −6.6 ptsRDWU −6.4 ptsANEL −6.3 ptsETU −6.2 ptsCRCA −6.0 ptsCRCG −6.0 ptsFOMG −6.0 ptsMUU −6.0 ptsBITU −5.9 ptsFUTG −5.9 ptsLITX −5.9 ptsCRMG −5.8 ptsIONX −5.8 ptsMULL −5.8 ptsNOWL −5.8 ptsRIOX −5.8 ptsBIB −5.7 ptsCOIG −5.7 ptsOSCX −5.7 ptsSMTG −5.6 ptsSOXL −5.6 ptsETHU −5.5 ptsKEYG −5.5 ptsSNDC −5.5 ptsUPLT −5.5 ptsVELL −5.5 ptsKEEX −5.4 ptsLUNL −5.4 ptsBTCL −5.3 ptsFNGU −5.3 ptsPLTL −5.3 ptsMVLL −5.2 ptsUXRP −5.2 ptsAMDL −5.1 ptsXAGI −5.1 ptsCCUP −5.0 ptsFBX −5.0 ptsQUBX −5.0 ptsSNDU −5.0 ptsTERG −5.0 ptsUMCX −5.0 ptsBTCU −4.8 ptsCOIA −4.8 ptsLNOK −4.8 ptsMSFC −4.8 ptsONTX −4.8 ptsPYPG −4.8 ptsSHNY −4.8 ptsNAIL −4.7 ptsTSEG −4.7 ptsFIGG −4.6 ptsKEYX −4.6 ptsRAM −4.6 ptsTSMU −4.6 ptsAAOG −4.5 ptsDUOG −4.5 ptsSPCU −4.5 ptsTELG −4.5 ptsBEC −4.4 ptsCONL −4.4 ptsCRWG −4.4 ptsSOFX −4.4 ptsSTXL −4.4 ptsAMUU −4.3 ptsHIMZ −4.3 ptsNVDX −4.3 ptsPTIR −4.3 ptsUCOP −4.3 ptsADBG −4.2 ptsBITX −4.2 ptsFDRX −4.2 ptsONDG −4.2 ptsQSU −4.2 ptsUPAL −4.2 ptsPDDL −4.1 ptsUNX −4.1 ptsFCXG −4.0 ptsGMEC −4.0 ptsHOOX −4.0 ptsMSFX −4.0 ptsNBIG −4.0 ptsPYPU −4.0 ptsXRPT −4.0 ptsXTAI −4.0 ptsACLZ −3.9 ptsCLSX −3.9 ptsIREX −3.9 ptsNVTX −3.9 ptsPANG −3.9 ptsPATX −3.9 ptsSHPU −3.9 ptsSPCF −3.9 ptsXLEX −3.9 ptsADIU −3.8 ptsAFRU −3.8 ptsAMDG −3.8 ptsBAIG −3.8 ptsBEG −3.8 ptsDLLL −3.8 ptsNEBX −3.8 ptsRCAX −3.8 ptsROBN −3.8 ptsVALG −3.8 ptsVSTL −3.8 ptsCONX −3.7 ptsECHX −3.7 ptsFBL −3.7 ptsHOOG −3.7 ptsMSFL −3.7 ptsONDU −3.7 ptsPLTU −3.7 ptsTSMG −3.7 ptsAMA −3.6 ptsASMG −3.6 ptsCWVX −3.6 ptsMETU −3.6 ptsSPCH −3.6 ptsAAOX −3.5 ptsACHX −3.5 ptsAPHG −3.5 ptsBRZX −3.5 ptsCDNG −3.5 ptsCOIX −3.5 ptsENTL −3.5 ptsINTW −3.5 ptsIONL −3.5 ptsARMG −3.4 ptsAVXX −3.4 ptsFGRU −3.4 ptsLOFF −3.4 ptsNBIL −3.4 ptsNEMG −3.4 ptsSMU −3.4 ptsAAPX −3.3 ptsADBU −3.3 ptsAMKL −3.3 ptsAVGU −3.3 ptsIOSX −3.3 ptsKBAB −3.3 ptsKMLI −3.3 ptsNVC −3.3 ptsPONX −3.3 ptsRKLX −3.3 ptsTSMX −3.3 ptsXLKX −3.3 ptsARCX −3.2 ptsCOHH −3.2 ptsFPSX −3.2 ptsKTUP −3.2 ptsMSFU −3.2 ptsOKLL −3.2 ptsOSSL −3.2 ptsQCMU −3.2 ptsTEMT −3.2 ptsXIWC −3.2 ptsAMAA −3.1 ptsGLGG −3.1 ptsHIBL −3.1 ptsHUTG −3.1 ptsKJD −3.1 ptsTECL −3.1 ptsTSEU −3.1 ptsUNHG −3.1 ptsAMAU −3.0 ptsASTG −3.0 ptsBABU −3.0 ptsCRWU −3.0 ptsHODU −3.0 ptsHONG −3.0 ptsKRWX −3.0 ptsMPWX −3.0 ptsMSIX −3.0 ptsNVDL −3.0 ptsPALU −3.0 ptsSPAX −3.0 ptsSTXU −3.0 ptsTQQQ −3.0 ptsXW −3.0 ptsASMZ −2.9 ptsAVGG −2.9 ptsCIFU −2.9 ptsCSCL −2.9 ptsGLXU −2.9 ptsIONC −2.9 ptsIREG −2.9 ptsMCHG −2.9 ptsNVDG −2.9 ptsNVDU −2.9 ptsORCU −2.9 ptsORCX −2.9 ptsQCML −2.9 ptsTXNU −2.9 ptsXEUR −2.9 ptsXOMX −2.9 ptsASTY −2.8 ptsAVGC −2.8 ptsCCPX −2.8 ptsCIEG −2.8 ptsSNOU −2.8 ptsSNXX −2.8 ptsTSLT −2.8 ptsTWSC −2.8 ptsUPRO −2.8 ptsURAA −2.8 ptsUSLV −2.8 ptsYINN −2.8 ptsBABX −2.7 ptsCARX −2.7 ptsEDC −2.7 ptsMRAL −2.7 ptsNUG −2.7 ptsNVOX −2.7 ptsPLUL −2.7 ptsRGTU −2.7 ptsSPXL −2.7 ptsXKRE −2.7 ptsXYZG −2.7 ptsASMU −2.6 ptsCIFG −2.6 ptsCOPZ −2.6 ptsCOTG −2.6 ptsCOZX −2.6 ptsGOU −2.6 ptsKPDD −2.6 ptsLULG −2.6 ptsSIMX −2.6 ptsSNAG −2.6 ptsTAJX −2.6 ptsWYFL −2.6 ptsAPLX −2.5 ptsAVGX −2.5 ptsLLYX −2.5 ptsLRNX −2.5 ptsMNSX −2.5 ptsMRVU −2.5 ptsPBRG −2.5 ptsPLU −2.5 ptsSPOG −2.5 ptsWEBL −2.5 ptsEMXX −2.4 ptsGLX −2.4 ptsNFLU −2.4 ptsNXPG −2.4 ptsRTXG −2.4 ptsSMUP −2.4 ptsSOFA −2.4 ptsTESC −2.4 ptsUDOW −2.4 ptsUSX −2.4 ptsVRTL −2.4 ptsWULX −2.4 ptsXHOA −2.4 ptsAMZU −2.3 ptsAPHU −2.3 ptsCEGX −2.3 ptsCSEX −2.3 ptsCURE −2.3 ptsFAS −2.3 ptsTSLL −2.3 ptsUGLD −2.3 ptsUUUG −2.3 ptsWX −2.3 ptsXBIX −2.3 ptsXLIX −2.3 ptsXLYX −2.3 ptsAAPB −2.2 ptsAAPU −2.2 ptsAVL −2.2 ptsBEX −2.2 ptsCBRG −2.2 ptsCRMU −2.2 ptsEURL −2.2 ptsFLYT −2.2 ptsGLWG −2.2 ptsLINT −2.2 ptsMEXX −2.2 ptsMIDU −2.2 ptsMPG −2.2 ptsMTSG −2.2 ptsTYD −2.2 ptsUECG −2.2 ptsWEBX −2.2 ptsAMDC −2.1 ptsARMA −2.1 ptsASUP −2.1 ptsDPST −2.1 ptsDUSL −2.1 ptsGOOX −2.1 ptsGUSH −2.1 ptsJOBX −2.1 ptsORAC −2.1 ptsRMBX −2.1 ptsRVNL −2.1 ptsTMF −2.1 ptsURTY −2.1 ptsXLPX −2.1 ptsDIG −2.0 ptsERX −2.0 ptsFNG −2.0 ptsQBTX −2.0 ptsSKYU −2.0 ptsSPAL −2.0 ptsTNA −2.0 ptsTSLG −2.0 ptsUMDD −2.0 ptsUSGG −2.0 ptsWANT −2.0 ptsXLBX −2.0 ptsXLFX −2.0 ptsAMZZ −1.9 ptsASTX −1.9 ptsBOEG −1.9 ptsCATG −1.9 ptsCRMX −1.9 ptsGGLL −1.9 ptsGOGL −1.9 ptsLABU −1.9 ptsLMTL −1.9 ptsLTL −1.9 ptsRDTL −1.9 ptsUPSX −1.9 ptsALBG −1.8 ptsCOHX −1.8 ptsGEVG −1.8 ptsLRCU −1.8 ptsNFXL −1.8 ptsOPEX −1.8 ptsROM −1.8 ptsTTDU −1.8 ptsUTSL −1.8 ptsXLVX −1.8 ptsGFSG −1.7 ptsISUL −1.7 ptsJNUG −1.7 ptsLEUX −1.7 ptsRETL −1.7 ptsTPOR −1.7 ptsTSLR −1.7 ptsTTMX −1.7 ptsUBR −1.7 ptsUNHU −1.7 ptsUVIX −1.7 ptsCRUC −1.6 ptsDFEN −1.6 ptsEFO −1.6 ptsMCHU −1.6 ptsNUGT −1.6 ptsONX −1.6 ptsQLD −1.6 ptsRBLU −1.6 ptsRXL −1.6 ptsSPCM −1.6 ptsSTXX −1.6 ptsTPLX −1.6 ptsUBRL −1.6 ptsUSAX −1.6 ptsWDCX −1.6 ptsXLUX −1.6 ptsXPEG −1.6 ptsAGQ −1.5 ptsBRZU −1.5 ptsCBRX −1.5 ptsGRAG −1.5 ptsKLAG −1.5 ptsRKX −1.5 ptsSSO −1.5 ptsUCC −1.5 ptsUPV −1.5 ptsAALG −1.4 ptsBIDG −1.4 ptsBOEU −1.4 ptsEOSU −1.4 ptsNIOG −1.4 ptsSNDG −1.4 ptsCPNX −1.3 ptsCRDU −1.3 ptsDDM −1.3 ptsDRN −1.3 ptsELIL −1.3 ptsEZJ −1.3 ptsMIC −1.3 ptsPILL −1.3 ptsUYG −1.3 ptsXPP −1.3 ptsIBX −1.2 ptsINDL −1.2 ptsKBDU −1.2 ptsOPEG −1.2 ptsUBT −1.2 ptsUPW −1.2 ptsUWM −1.2 ptsCWEB −1.1 ptsFNGG −1.1 ptsGEVX −1.1 ptsMVV −1.1 ptsSAA −1.1 ptsSPUU −1.1 ptsUXI −1.1 ptsASTT −1.0 ptsUGE −1.0 ptsUGL −1.0 ptsFNGO −0.9 ptsNXPX −0.9 ptsUCTX −0.9 ptsUST −0.9 ptsCIEX −0.8 ptsCPXR −0.8 ptsEET −0.8 ptsLABX −0.8 ptsTSL −0.8 ptsACMM −0.7 ptsAPPX −0.7 ptsUYM −0.7 ptsCAMC −0.6 ptsCIFC −0.6 ptsTEUP −0.6 ptsCHAU −0.5 ptsEO −0.5 ptsURE −0.5 ptsAPPC −0.4 ptsUCO −0.2 ptsLASC +0.4 ptsRMBC +0.6 ptsXCOM +3.4 ptsLMNX +11.0 ptsXNDX −0.5 ptsXNDX −0.5 pts−19.3 pts+11.0 pts
−19.3 pts to +11.0 pts across 470

That is the share of the 470 leveraged ETFs, long, over three months sitting at or below XNDX.

A position in this set, not a rating: it moves when the set moves, and it is not a figure to average against another desk's.

WindowFundXNDU+2x the moveDifferenceXNDU moved about
1M Sep 2 – Oct 2, 2026−83.5%−56.7%−113.5%+30.0 pts73%
3M Jul 2 – Oct 2, 2026−89.3%−63.0%−126.0%+36.7 pts77%
Since launch May 7 – Oct 2, 2026−96.3%−75.3%−150.5%+54.3 pts96%

XNDX over each window to Oct 2, 2026. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation. Source: ETFIQ.

Head to head
Funds near this one

In plain words

Read the multiple against the whole window instead and 2 times XNDU's −63.0% implies −126.0%, which makes XNDX look 36.7 points over. 37.2 of that is daily compounding, which happens to any 2 times fund over the same path, and the rest is the fund. XNDX aims to return +2 times XNDU's move each day, then resets. Over one day it does that. Over longer, the daily results compound, so the total is not +2 times the period's move: in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less, and in a steady run it can be more. XNDU moved at 77% annualized over that window. That is what decides how far the two figures separate: the same fund on a calm underlying and a violent one is a different product.
Sets out to return+2 times the daily move of XNDU, reset daily
Multiple a holder actually got over the window (ETFIQ)+1.42 times, against +2 stated
UnderlyingXNDU
Segmentsingle stock, company
Net assets (the issuer’s own daily fund list, as of Oct 2, 2026)$3m
Expense ratio (485BPOS XBRL, Mar 31, 2026)1.49%
LaunchedMay 7, 2026
Underlying volatility over the window (ETFIQ)77% annualized
XNDX (Tradr 2X Long XNDU Daily ETF), leveraged ETFs fields as of Oct 2, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
Returns are ETFIQ calculations from Tiingo end-of-day prices, distributions reinvested, measured against the underlying over exactly the same days. How these figures are computed

Questions people ask about XNDX

Did XNDX return +2 times XNDU?
Over the window to Oct 2, 2026, XNDU moved −63.0% and XNDX returned −89.3%. 2 times that move is −126.0%, so the fund came out 36.7 points ahead of it.
Why does XNDX not return +2 times over a year?
Because it resets daily. XNDX aims at +2 times each day's move, and daily results compound. Over a run where the underlying falls and comes back, compounding a levered daily return leaves a holder behind what +2 times the period move would suggest; over a steady run in one direction it can leave them ahead. The longer the holding, and the more the underlying moves about, the further apart the two figures get.
Sources and dates
Prices, XNDX and XNDUTiingo end-of-day prices ↗
Fee, 1.49%SEC 485BPOS XBRL · Mar 31, 2026
Net assets, $3mThe issuer’s own daily fund list · Oct 2, 2026
IssuerTradr website ↗
All fund filingsFund filings on SEC EDGAR ↗
SourceSEC investment company series and class file, which lists every registered fund ↗

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

How these figures are computed →Standards and sources →Open data →
Cite this page

ETFIQ, XNDX, leveraged ETFs, data as of Oct 2, 2026. https://etfiq.com/funds/xndx

Open XNDX live on ETFIQ

Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

Stated multiple
What the fund sets out to return against its underlying, each day. A fund at 2x aims to return twice the underlying’s daily move, and an inverse fund at -2x aims to return twice it in the opposite direction.
Daily reset
The fund starts each day aiming at the multiple again, from wherever it now stands. It is the mechanism that makes these funds behave as they do, and the reason the stated multiple applies to a day rather than to a holding period.
Compounding
Daily results multiply together rather than adding up. Two days of the multiple is not twice the multiple, and over a run of days the difference between the two grows with how far the underlying moves about.
Decay
What compounding costs a holder when the underlying falls and rises back to where it started. The underlying is level and the fund is down; the more violently it moved, the further down.
Difference against the stated multiple
The fund’s return minus the stated multiple times the underlying’s return, in percentage points. The one figure that says whether a holder got what the fund’s own multiple describes.
Every term used here, defined in full on the leveraged ETFs vocabulary page. →
Leveraged ETFs against their own promise, 2026-Q3→Leveraged ETFs against their own promise, August 2026→Tradr: every fund ETFIQ covers→The leveraged ETFs that beat their stated multiple→