IONL GraniteShares 2x Long IONQ Daily ETF
Three months to Sep 30, 2026: IONL returned −39.6% where its own daily promise gave −36.9%, 2.7 points short.
Over the 1 month to Sep 30, 2026, IONL returned +20.2%, where 2 times that move implies +23.1%. The difference is −3.0 pts.
Over the 3 months to Sep 30, 2026, IONL returned −39.6%, where 2 times that move implies −29.3%. The difference is −10.2 pts.
Over the 6 months to Sep 30, 2026, IONL returned +50.9%, where 2 times that move implies +115.7%. The difference is −64.8 pts.
Over the 1 year to Sep 30, 2026, IONL returned −81.9%, where 2 times that move implies −57.4%. The difference is −24.6 pts.
Over the since launch to Sep 30, 2026, IONL returned −36.2%, where 2 times that move implies +143.3%. The difference is −179.5 pts.
IONL finished 2.7 points short of what +2 times IONQ’s daily move would have given, compounded through the same days.
Did it keep up with its own daily multiple, compounded day by day?
That is the share of the 470 leveraged ETFs, long, over three months sitting at or below IONL.
A position in this set, not a rating: it moves when the set moves, and it is not a figure to average against another desk's.
| Window | Fund | IONQ | +2x the move | Difference | IONQ moved about |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1M Aug 31 – Sep 30, 2026 | +20.2% | +11.6% | +23.1% | −3.0 pts | 55% |
| 3M Jul 1 – Sep 30, 2026 | −39.6% | −14.7% | −29.3% | −10.2 pts | 76% |
| 6M Apr 1 – Sep 30, 2026 | +50.9% | +57.8% | +115.7% | −64.8 pts | 93% |
| 1Y Sep 30, 2025 – Sep 30, 2026 | −81.9% | −28.7% | −57.4% | −24.6 pts | 94% |
| Since launch Mar 25, 2025 – Sep 30, 2026 | −36.2% | +71.7% | +143.3% | −179.5 pts | 95% |
IONL over each window to Sep 30, 2026. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation. Source: ETFIQ.
Every fund that sets out to return +2 times IONQ, over the days all of them have been trading. Ranked by how close each came to its own stated multiple.
| Fund | Issuer | Returned | +2x the move | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IONC | Corgi | +6.2% | +6.2% | 0.0 pts |
| IONL | GraniteShares | +5.5% | +6.2% | −0.7 pts |
| IONX | Defiance | +5.4% | +6.2% | −0.8 pts |
| Fund | Issuer | Returned | +2x the move | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IONL | GraniteShares | +20.2% | +23.1% | −3.0 pts |
| IONC | Corgi | +20.0% | +23.1% | −3.2 pts |
| IONX | Defiance | +19.0% | +23.1% | −4.2 pts |
| Fund | Issuer | Returned | +2x the move | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IONC | Corgi | −39.1% | −29.3% | −9.8 pts |
| IONL | GraniteShares | −39.6% | −29.3% | −10.2 pts |
| IONX | Defiance | −42.0% | −29.3% | −12.7 pts |
IONQ funds at +2x, to Sep 30, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
In plain words
Questions people ask about IONL
- Did IONL return +2 times IONQ?
- Over the window to Sep 30, 2026, IONQ moved −14.7% and IONL returned −39.6%. 2 times that move is −29.3%, so the fund came out 10.2 points short of it.
- Why does IONL not return +2 times over a year?
- Because it resets daily. IONL aims at +2 times each day's move, and daily results compound. Over a run where the underlying falls and comes back, compounding a levered daily return leaves a holder behind what +2 times the period move would suggest; over a steady run in one direction it can leave them ahead. The longer the holding, and the more the underlying moves about, the further apart the two figures get.
- Which +2x IONQ ETF tracked its stated multiple most closely?
- 3 issuers sell one. Over the days all of them have been trading, the table on this page ranks them by how far each finished from 2 times the underlying's move. ETFIQ does not rate funds; the order is the figure itself.
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
ETFIQ, IONL, leveraged ETFs, data as of Sep 30, 2026. https://etfiq.com/funds/ionl
ETFIQ. (Sep 30, 2026). IONL, leveraged ETFs. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/funds/ionl
[IONL, leveraged ETFs (ETFIQ, Sep 30, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/funds/ionl)
The label bar for IONL, redrawn every trading night. Free to use with the credit link.
Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.