CONI GraniteShares 2x Short COIN Daily ETF

Aims to return twice the opposite of the daily move of Coinbase Global (COIN)GraniteShares1.15% fee$13mSince Sep 4, 2024Fund page at the issuer ↗SEC filings ↗Every GraniteShares fund ETFIQ covers

Three months to Sep 30, 2026: CONI returned −53.7% where its own daily promise gave −52.8%, 0.9 points short.

+17.1%
What COIN did
−52.8%
What −2 times a day gives
−53.7%
What the fund returned
−0.9 pts
The fund itself cost
What it aimed at, and what it did
17.4 pts short of its stated multipleCONI returned −15.6% while −2 times COIN's move would have been +1.8%COIN −0.9% ×−2 implies+1.8%CONI returned−15.6%17.4 pts short of its stated multipleCONI returned −15.6% while −2 times COIN's move would have been +1.8%COIN −0.9% ×−2 implies+1.8%CONI returned−15.6%

Over the 1 month to Sep 30, 2026, CONI returned −15.6%, where −2 times that move implies +1.8%. The difference is −17.4 pts.

19.6 pts short of its stated multipleCONI returned −53.7% while −2 times COIN's move would have been −34.1%COIN +17.1% ×−2 implies−34.1%CONI returned−53.7%19.6 pts short of its stated multipleCONI returned −53.7% while −2 times COIN's move would have been −34.1%COIN +17.1% ×−2 implies−34.1%CONI returned−53.7%

Over the 3 months to Sep 30, 2026, CONI returned −53.7%, where −2 times that move implies −34.1%. The difference is −19.6 pts.

46.1 pts short of its stated multipleCONI returned −61.6% while −2 times COIN's move would have been −15.5%COIN +7.8% ×−2 implies−15.5%CONI returned−61.6%46.1 pts short of its stated multipleCONI returned −61.6% while −2 times COIN's move would have been −15.5%COIN +7.8% ×−2 implies−15.5%CONI returned−61.6%

Over the 6 months to Sep 30, 2026, CONI returned −61.6%, where −2 times that move implies −15.5%. The difference is −46.1 pts.

130.8 pts short of its stated multipleCONI returned −41.3% while −2 times COIN's move would have been +89.5%COIN −44.8% ×−2 implies+89.5%CONI returned−41.3%130.8 pts short of its stated multipleCONI returned −41.3% while −2 times COIN's move would have been +89.5%COIN −44.8% ×−2 implies+89.5%CONI returned−41.3%

Over the 1 year to Sep 30, 2026, CONI returned −41.3%, where −2 times that move implies +89.5%. The difference is −130.8 pts.

66.8 pts short of its stated multipleCONI returned −95.2% while −2 times COIN's move would have been −28.4%COIN +14.2% ×−2 implies−28.4%CONI returned−95.2%66.8 pts short of its stated multipleCONI returned −95.2% while −2 times COIN's move would have been −28.4%COIN +14.2% ×−2 implies−28.4%CONI returned−95.2%

Over the since launch to Sep 30, 2026, CONI returned −95.2%, where −2 times that move implies −28.4%. The difference is −66.8 pts.

ETFIQ Decay Resistance Score
8.4115th of 125

CONI finished 0.9 points short of what -2 times COIN’s daily move would have given, compounded through the same days.

points against its own daily promise, compounded−0.9 pts · 8th pct

Did it keep up with its own daily multiple, compounded day by day?

Points against its own daily promise, compounded
QBTZ −24.9 ptsRKLZ −21.5 ptsIONZ −14.0 ptsRGTZ −10.3 ptsASTN −9.3 ptsSPCQ −6.0 ptsSMZ −5.6 ptsMUZ −3.1 ptsAPLZ −2.0 ptsSMCZ −1.1 ptsSVIX −0.9 ptsSMST −0.8 ptsBMNZ −0.7 ptsSNK −0.5 ptsCORD −0.3 ptsCRCD −0.3 ptsSSPC −0.2 ptsIREZ −0.1 ptsMSTZ −0.1 ptsPLTZ −0.1 ptsSTSM −0.1 ptsNBIZ 0.0 ptsGDXD +0.1 ptsBEZ +0.2 ptsNVDQ +0.2 ptsDAMD +0.3 ptsETHD +0.3 ptsSNDQ +0.3 ptsTSLZ +0.3 ptsBTCZ +0.5 ptsCBRZ +0.5 ptsLITZ +0.5 ptsSBIT +0.8 ptsMSFD +1.0 ptsSETH +1.0 ptsEFZ +1.1 ptsSPCG +1.1 ptsBITI +1.2 ptsDULL +1.2 ptsGGLS +1.2 ptsMETD +1.2 ptsPALD +1.2 ptsAMZD +1.3 ptsBZQ +1.3 ptsYXI +1.3 ptsAAPD +1.4 ptsAMZO +1.4 ptsCSCS +1.4 ptsEUM +1.4 ptsJDST +1.4 ptsNVD +1.4 ptsNVDS +1.4 ptsORCS +1.4 ptsQCMD +1.4 ptsREK +1.4 ptsEFU +1.5 ptsNFXS +1.5 ptsSCO +1.5 ptsTSDD +1.5 ptsTSMZ +1.5 ptsDOG +1.6 ptsDRIP +1.6 ptsEWV +1.6 ptsMUD +1.6 ptsMYY +1.6 ptsNVDD +1.6 ptsRWM +1.6 ptsSBB +1.6 ptsSKRE +1.6 ptsDUG +1.7 ptsDUST +1.7 ptsPSQ +1.7 ptsSEF +1.7 ptsSH +1.7 ptsSPDN +1.7 ptsTBX +1.7 ptsAVS +1.8 ptsEPV +1.8 ptsERY +1.8 ptsTBF +1.8 ptsEEV +1.9 ptsRXD +2.0 ptsREW +2.1 ptsTSLS +2.1 ptsSMN +2.2 ptsSZK +2.2 ptsPST +2.3 ptsTSLQ +2.4 ptsWEBS +2.4 ptsFNGD +2.5 ptsSDS +2.5 ptsSKF +2.5 ptsSRS +2.5 ptsDXD +2.6 ptsQID +2.6 ptsSDP +2.6 ptsTBT +2.7 ptsFXP +2.8 ptsSIJ +2.8 ptsTECS +2.8 ptsMZZ +2.9 ptsEDZ +3.0 ptsGLL +3.0 ptsLABD +3.0 ptsSCC +3.0 ptsSDD +3.0 ptsTWM +3.0 ptsHIBS +3.2 ptsYANG +3.2 ptsSPXS +3.4 ptsSPXU +3.4 ptsSQQQ +3.4 ptsDRV +3.5 ptsSOXS +3.7 ptsFAZ +4.0 ptsSDOW +4.0 ptsTTT +4.0 ptsZSL +4.1 ptsTZA +4.2 ptsSMDD +4.3 ptsSRTY +4.4 ptsTMV +4.6 ptsTYO +4.7 ptsBIS +5.1 ptsCONI −0.9 ptsCONI −0.9 pts−24.9 pts+5.1 pts
−24.9 pts to +5.1 pts across 125

That is the share of the 125 inverse ETFs over three months sitting at or below CONI.

A position in this set, not a rating: it moves when the set moves, and it is not a figure to average against another desk's.

WindowFundCOIN-2x the moveDifferenceCOIN moved about
1M Aug 31 – Sep 30, 2026−15.6%−0.9%+1.8%−17.4 pts83%
3M Jul 1 – Sep 30, 2026−53.7%+17.1%−34.1%−19.6 pts75%
6M Apr 1 – Sep 30, 2026−61.6%+7.8%−15.5%−46.1 pts70%
1Y Sep 30, 2025 – Sep 30, 2026−41.3%−44.8%+89.5%−130.8 pts72%
Since launch Sep 4, 2024 – Sep 30, 2026−95.2%+14.2%−28.4%−66.8 pts79%

CONI over each window to Sep 30, 2026. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation. Source: ETFIQ.

In plain words

Read the multiple against the whole window instead and −2 times COIN's 17.1% implies −34.1%, which makes CONI look 19.6 points short. 18.7 of that is daily compounding, which happens to any −2 times fund over the same path, and the rest is the fund. CONI aims to return -2 times COIN's move each day, then resets. Over one day it does that. Over longer, the daily results compound, so the total is not -2 times the period's move: in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less, and in a steady run it can be more. COIN moved at 75% annualized over that window. That is what decides how far the two figures separate: the same fund on a calm underlying and a violent one is a different product.
Sets out to return-2 times the daily move of COIN, reset daily
Multiple a holder actually got over the window (ETFIQ)-3.15 times, against -2 stated
UnderlyingCOIN
Segmentsingle stock, company
Net assets (issuer page, as of Sep 30, 2026)$13m
Expense ratio (485BPOS XBRL, Oct 24, 2025)1.15%
LaunchedSep 4, 2024
Underlying volatility over the window (ETFIQ)75% annualized
CONI (GraniteShares 2x Short COIN Daily ETF), leveraged ETFs fields as of Sep 30, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
Returns are ETFIQ calculations from Tiingo end-of-day prices, distributions reinvested, measured against the underlying over exactly the same days. How these figures are computed

Questions people ask about CONI

Did CONI return -2 times COIN?
Over the window to Sep 30, 2026, COIN moved +17.1% and CONI returned −53.7%. −2 times that move is −34.1%, so the fund came out 19.6 points short of it.
Why does CONI not return -2 times over a year?
Because it resets daily. CONI aims at -2 times each day's move, and daily results compound. Over a run where the underlying falls and comes back, compounding a levered daily return leaves a holder behind what -2 times the period move would suggest; over a steady run in one direction it can leave them ahead. The longer the holding, and the more the underlying moves about, the further apart the two figures get.
Sources and dates
Prices, CONI and COINTiingo end-of-day prices ↗
Fee, 1.15%SEC 485BPOS XBRL · Oct 24, 2025
Net assets, $13mIssuer page · Sep 30, 2026

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

Cite this page

ETFIQ, CONI, leveraged ETFs, data as of Sep 30, 2026. https://etfiq.com/funds/coni

Open CONI live on ETFIQ

The label bar for CONI, redrawn every trading night. Free to use with the credit link.

Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

Stated multiple
What the fund sets out to return against its underlying, each day. A fund at 2x aims to return twice the underlying’s daily move, and an inverse fund at -2x aims to return twice it in the opposite direction.
Daily reset
The fund starts each day aiming at the multiple again, from wherever it now stands. It is the mechanism that makes these funds behave as they do, and the reason the stated multiple applies to a day rather than to a holding period.
Compounding
Daily results multiply together rather than adding up. Two days of the multiple is not twice the multiple, and over a run of days the difference between the two grows with how far the underlying moves about.
Decay
What compounding costs a holder when the underlying falls and rises back to where it started. The underlying is level and the fund is down; the more violently it moved, the further down.
Difference against the stated multiple
The fund’s return minus the stated multiple times the underlying’s return, in percentage points. The one figure that says whether a holder got what the fund’s own multiple describes.