Do SGDM and SLVP hold the same stocks?

By their latest filings, 29% of their books are the same securities at the same weight. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.

Which is more different from the S&P 500, SGDM or SLVP?

SGDM has 8% of its weight in S&P 500 names and SLVP has 5%, so SGDM differs more from the index.

Which is cheaper, SGDM or SLVP?

SGDM charges 0.46% a year and SLVP charges 0.39%, so SLVP is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Thematic ETFs

SGDM vs SLVP: Holdings Overlap & Returns

Share on X Download as PDF

Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, SGDM returned +27.9% to SLVP's +31.0%; 29% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about SGDM and SLVP

Net assets on Nov 4, 2026: $617m for Sprott Gold Miners ETF and $799m for iShares MSCI Global Silver and Metals Miners ETF.

SGDM on its own →SLVP on its own →

At a glance

8.0%

SGDM in the S&P 500

5.3%

SLVP in the S&P 500

+27.9%

SGDM total return, 1 year

+31.0%

SLVP total return, 1 year

SGDM · 1 year to Nov 4, 2026 92% of its weight is outside the S&P 500

8% of SGDM's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 92% is outside the index. Holdings as of Nov 4, 2026.

SLVP · 1 year to Nov 4, 2026 95% of its weight is outside the S&P 500

5% of SLVP's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 95% is outside the index. Holdings as of Nov 3, 2026.

Pair scorecard

SLVP costs 0.07 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 3.1 points; SLVP is 1.3 times larger.

Points (pts) are percentage points.

SGDM vs SLVP: Holdings Overlap & Returns
Measure	SGDM	SLVP
Return
Measure	SGDM	SLVP
Total return, 1 year	+27.9%	+31.0%
Drawdown
Measure	SGDM	SLVP
Below its all-time high	25.6%, high on Mar 2, 2026	33.0%, high on Feb 27, 2026
Against its benchmark
Measure	SGDM	SLVP
What it tracks	Gold miners	Silver miners
Its benchmark, total return, 1 year		+15.0%
Against its benchmark, 1 year		ahead by 16.0 pts
Cost and size
Measure	SGDM	SLVP
Expense ratio	0.46%	0.39%
Net assets	$617m	$799m
Holdings
Measure	SGDM	SLVP
Holdings in common	29%

Method

Risk and return

Jul 25, 2014 to Oct 30, 2026 · 640 weekly returns

SGDM SLVP

Return

Total return edge SGDM (slight) +182.9% +166.2%

Annualized edge SGDM (slight) +8.8% +8.3%

Price return edge SGDM +156.9% +122.4%

Risk

Volatility edge SGDM 37.5% 42.2%

Max drawdown edge SGDM −52.3% −61.6%

Risk-adjusted

Sharpe edge Tie 0.36 0.35

Sortino edge Tie 0.53 0.52

Calmar edge SGDM 0.17 0.13

Reading

From Jul 2014 to Oct 2026, SGDM returned slightly more: +182.9% to +166.2%. SGDM swung less: 37.5% to 42.2%. SGDM fell less at its worst: −52.3% to −61.6%.

Full scorecard

9 measures, with how each is measured Open ↓

Risk and return: SGDM vs SLVP: Holdings Overlap & Returns
Measure	SGDM	SLVP	Edge	How it is measured
Return
Total return	+182.9%	+166.2%	SGDM (slight)	Price change plus distributions, reinvested.
Annualized	+8.8%	+8.3%	SGDM (slight)	Total return as a yearly rate.
Price return	+156.9%	+122.4%	SGDM	Price change alone, distributions left out.
Risk
Volatility	37.5%	42.2%	SGDM	Spread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier.
Downside deviation	25.3%	28.7%	SGDM	Like volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate.
Max drawdown	−52.3%	−61.6%	SGDM	Deepest fall from a high to the low after it.
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe	0.36	0.35	Tie	Return above Treasury bills per unit of volatility.
Sortino	0.53	0.52	Tie	Return above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation.
Calmar	0.17	0.13	SGDM	Annualized return divided by the max drawdown.

Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 640 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.

What they share

29%

By the books each fund has filed, SGDM and SLVP hold 29% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Nov 3, 2026 and Nov 4, 2026.

50%

0 half 100%

half

29% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first SGDM SLVP

Newmont Corp. 8.00% 5.32%

Agnico Eagle Mines Ltd. 10.02% 4.99%

Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. 7.10% 4.78%

Discovery Mining Ltd. 2.65% 4.85%

Kinross Gold Corp. 3.85% 2.44%

Coeur Mining Inc. 2.97% 1.64%

Pan American Silver Corp. 3.45% 1.63%

DPM Metals Inc. 2.82% 1.23%

Lundin Gold Inc. 3.58% 1.19%

Fortuna Mining Corp. 2.18% 0.84%

Torex Resources Inc 2.85% 0.68%

Eldorado Gold Corp. 0.28% 1.19%

Only in one fund ↓

Only in SGDM

Barrick Mining Corp. 7.73%

Franco-Nevada Corp. 6.17%

Endeavour Mining PLC 3.11%

Harmony Gold Mining Co. Ltd. 2.98%

IAMGOLD Corp. 2.97%

OR Royalties Inc. 2.88%

Triple Flag Precious Metals Corp. 2.75%

Centerra Gold Inc. 2.73%

Only in SLVP

HECLA MINING 13.56%

INDUST PENOLES 11.08%

FIRST MAJESTIC SILVER 10.21%

FRESNILLO PLC 8.30%

AYA GOLD & SILVER INC 5.25%

ENDEAVOUR SILVER CORP 3.79%

SILVERCORP METALS INC 3.21%

GOGOLD RESOURCES 1.86%

Check overlap with more funds →

Window by window

Window by window: SGDM vs SLVP: Holdings Overlap & Returns
	Total return		vs its benchmark
Window	SGDM	SLVP	SGDM	SLVP
3 months	+2.7%	−6.8%	not measured	−5.5 pts vs ACWI
6 months	−5.9%	−14.7%	not measured	−17.3 pts vs ACWI
1 year	+27.9%	+31.0%	not measured	+16.0 pts vs ACWI
3 years	+198.6%	+257.6%	not measured	+180.0 pts vs ACWI
Since launchNot the same days: SGDM Jul 2014 · SLVP Feb 2012	+219.4%	+53.4%	not measured	−314.3 pts vs ACWI

Open this comparison in the app →

Side by side

SGDM Sprott Gold Miners ETF · Holds 48 stocks in gold miners, 8% of its weight in S&P 500 companies SLVP iShares MSCI Global Silver and Metals Miners ETF · Holds 37 stocks in silver miners, 5% of its weight in S&P 500 companies

Issuer Sprott iShares

Theme Gold miners Silver miners

In the S&P 500 8.0% 5.3%

Active share vs the S&P 500 99.8% 99.8%

In the Nasdaq-100 0.0% 0.0%

Holdings 48 37

Top ten, share of the fund 56.0% 72.1%

Expense ratio 0.46% 0.39%

Fee for the differing part 0.46% 0.39%

Total return, 1 year +27.9% +31.0%

vs its benchmark not measured +16.0 pts vs ACWI

Below its high −25.6% −33.0%

Net assets $617m $799m

As of Nov 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

29% of the two portfolios are the same securities at the same weight.

Client brief:

The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.

Your saved page · Privacy.

Alert

About each fund

SGDM

By weight, 8% of SGDM's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 56% of the fund across 48 positions, as published by its issuer for Nov 4, 2026. Over the year to Nov 4, 2026 the fund returned +27.9% with distributions reinvested. It sits 25.6% below its all-time high of Mar 2, 2026.

SLVP

By weight, 5% of SLVP's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 72% of the fund across 37 positions, as published by its issuer for Nov 3, 2026. Over the year to Nov 4, 2026 the fund returned +31.0% with distributions reinvested against +15.0% for its benchmark, the MSCI All Country World Index, so a holder was ahead by 16.0 pts. It sits 33.0% below its all-time high of Feb 27, 2026.

Questions people ask

Do SGDM and SLVP hold the same stocks?: By their latest filings, 29% of their books are the same securities at the same weight. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.
Which is more different from the S&P 500, SGDM or SLVP?: SGDM has 8% of its weight in S&P 500 names and SLVP has 5%, so SGDM differs more from the index.
Which is cheaper, SGDM or SLVP?: SGDM charges 0.46% a year and SLVP charges 0.39%, so SLVP is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

SGDM vs AGMI SGDM vs SILJ SGDM vs SIL SGDM vs REMX SLVP vs GBUG SLVP vs GDXJ SLVP vs AUMI SLVP vs GDX

Where to next

All thematic ETFs ranked by the S&P 500 Difference Score →How the scores are computed →SGDM on its own →SLVP on its own →SGDM dividend history →SGDM holdings →SLVP dividend history →SLVP holdings →Method →Standards and sources →

Sources and dates

SGDM filings on SEC EDGAR ↗

SGDM prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗

Sprott page for SGDM ↗

SLVP filings on SEC EDGAR ↗

SLVP prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗

iShares page for SLVP ↗

Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.

How this is computed

Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.

Every number is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested.

Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, SGDM against SLVP, data as of Nov 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/sgdm-vs-slvp

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.