Data as of Nov 4, 2026.

vsOpen in the appCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Thematic ETFs

REMX vs SGDM: Holdings Overlap & Returns

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, REMX returned −17.8% to SGDM's +27.9%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about REMX and SGDM

Net assets: $1.4bn on Nov 3, 2026 for VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF, and $617m on Nov 4, 2026 for Sprott Gold Miners ETF.

At a glance
8.7%
REMX in the S&P 500
8.0%
SGDM in the S&P 500
−17.8%
REMX total return, 1 year
+27.9%
SGDM total return, 1 year
REMX · 1 year to Nov 4, 2026 91% of its weight is outside the S&P 500
91% of its weight is outside the S&P 5009% of REMX's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 91% is outside the index. Holdings as of Nov 2, 2026.9%91%inof its weight outside the S&P 500active share 100% · top ten 62% of the fund · 32 holdings as published by its issuer for Nov 2, 2026 · Nasdaq-100: 0% in91% of its weight is outside the S&P 5009% of REMX's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 91% is outside the index. Holdings as of Nov 2, 2026.9%91%9% of its weight in S&P 500 companiesof its weight outside the S&P 500active share 100% · Nasdaq-100: 0% in

9% of REMX's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 91% is outside the index. Holdings as of Nov 2, 2026.

SGDM · 1 year to Nov 4, 2026 92% of its weight is outside the S&P 500
92% of its weight is outside the S&P 5008% of SGDM's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 92% is outside the index. Holdings as of Nov 4, 2026.8%92%inof its weight outside the S&P 500active share 100% · top ten 56% of the fund · 48 holdings as published by its issuer for Nov 4, 2026 · Nasdaq-100: 0% in92% of its weight is outside the S&P 5008% of SGDM's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 92% is outside the index. Holdings as of Nov 4, 2026.8%92%8% of its weight in S&P 500 companiesof its weight outside the S&P 500active share 100% · Nasdaq-100: 0% in

8% of SGDM's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 92% is outside the index. Holdings as of Nov 4, 2026.

Pair scorecard

SGDM costs 0.07 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 45.7 points; REMX is 2.5 times larger.

Points (pts) are percentage points.

REMX vs SGDM: Holdings Overlap & Returns
MeasureREMXSGDM
Return
Total return, 1 year−17.8%+27.9%
Drawdown
Below its all-time high76.3%, high on Apr 11, 201125.6%, high on Mar 2, 2026
Against its benchmark
What it tracksRare earth and critical materialsGold miners
Its benchmark, total return, 1 year+15.0%
Against its benchmark, 1 yearbehind by 32.8 pts
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.53%0.46%
Net assets, as of Nov 3, 2026$1.4bn$570m
Holdings
Holdings in common0%

Method

Risk and return

Jul 25, 2014 to Oct 30, 2026 · 640 weekly returns
REMX SGDM
Return
Total return edge SGDM −34.7% +182.9%
Annualized edge SGDM −3.4% +8.8%
Price return edge SGDM −54.9% +156.9%
Risk
Volatility edge REMX (slight) 36.5% 37.5%
Max drawdown edge SGDM −70.4% −52.3%
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe edge SGDM 0.03 0.36
Sortino edge SGDM 0.04 0.53
Calmar edge SGDM −0.05 0.17
Reading

From Jul 2014 to Oct 2026, SGDM returned more: +182.9% to −34.7%. REMX swung slightly less: 36.5% to 37.5%. SGDM fell less at its worst: −52.3% to −70.4%.

Full scorecard

9 measures, with how each is measured
Open ↓
Risk and return: REMX vs SGDM: Holdings Overlap & Returns
MeasureREMXSGDMEdgeHow it is measured
Return
Total return−34.7%+182.9%SGDMPrice change plus distributions, reinvested.
Annualized−3.4%+8.8%SGDMTotal return as a yearly rate.
Price return−54.9%+156.9%SGDMPrice change alone, distributions left out.
Risk
Volatility36.5%37.5%REMX (slight)Spread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier.
Downside deviation25.0%25.3%TieLike volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate.
Max drawdown−70.4%−52.3%SGDMDeepest fall from a high to the low after it.
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe0.030.36SGDMReturn above Treasury bills per unit of volatility.
Sortino0.040.53SGDMReturn above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation.
Calmar−0.050.17SGDMAnnualized return divided by the max drawdown.

Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 640 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, REMX and SGDM hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Nov 3, 2026 and Nov 4, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first REMX SGDM
Only in one fund ↓
Only in REMX
Albemarle Corp 8.70%
Sociedad Quimica Y Minera De Chile Sa 8.64%
China Northern Rare Earth Group High-Te 7.69%
Mp Materials Corp 6.88%
Lynas Rare Earths Ltd 6.74%
Pilbara Minerals Ltd 5.36%
Jinduicheng Molybdenum Co Ltd 5.14%
Xiamen Tungsten Co Ltd 4.61%
Only in SGDM
Agnico Eagle Mines Ltd. 10.02%
Newmont Corp. 8.00%
Barrick Mining Corp. 7.73%
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. 7.10%
Franco-Nevada Corp. 6.17%
Kinross Gold Corp. 3.85%
Lundin Gold Inc. 3.58%
Pan American Silver Corp. 3.45%
Check overlap with more funds →

Window by window

Window by window: REMX vs SGDM: Holdings Overlap & Returns
Total returnvs its benchmark
WindowREMXSGDMREMXSGDM
3 months−28.6%+2.7%−27.3 pts vs ACWInot measured
6 months−52.6%−5.9%−55.2 pts vs ACWInot measured
1 year−17.8%+27.9%−32.8 pts vs ACWInot measured
3 years−9.2%+198.6%−86.8 pts vs ACWInot measured
Since launchNot the same days: REMX Oct 2010 · SGDM Jul 2014−65.3%+219.4%−453.0 pts vs ACWInot measured

Open this comparison in the app →

Side by side

REMX VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF · Holds 32 stocks in rare earth and critical materials, 9% of its weight in S&P 500 companies SGDM Sprott Gold Miners ETF · Holds 48 stocks in gold miners, 8% of its weight in S&P 500 companies
Issuer VanEck Sprott
Theme Rare earth and critical materials Gold miners
In the S&P 500 8.7% 8.0%
Active share vs the S&P 500 100.0% 99.8%
In the Nasdaq-100 0.0% 0.0%
Holdings 32 48
Top ten, share of the fund 61.9% 56.0%
Expense ratio 0.53% 0.46%
Fee for the differing part 0.53% 0.46%
Total return, 1 year −17.8% +27.9%
vs its benchmark −32.8 pts vs ACWI not measured
Below its high −76.3% −25.6%
Net assets, REMX as of Nov 3, 2026 and SGDM as of Nov 4, 2026 $1.4bn $617m

As of Nov 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

0% of the two portfolios are the same securities at the same weight.

Client brief:

The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.

Your saved page · Privacy.

Alert

REMX flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
REMX

By weight, 9% of REMX's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 62% of the fund across 32 positions, as published by its issuer for Nov 3, 2026. Over the year to Nov 4, 2026 the fund returned −17.8% with distributions reinvested against +15.0% for its benchmark, the MSCI ACWI Index, so a holder was behind by 32.8 pts. It sits 76.3% below its all-time high of Apr 11, 2011.

SGDM

By weight, 8% of SGDM's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 56% of the fund across 48 positions, as published by its issuer for Nov 4, 2026. Over the year to Nov 4, 2026 the fund returned +27.9% with distributions reinvested. It sits 25.6% below its all-time high of Mar 2, 2026.

Questions people ask

Do REMX and SGDM hold the same stocks?
By their latest filings, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.
Which is more different from the S&P 500, REMX or SGDM?
REMX has 9% of its weight in S&P 500 names and SGDM has 8%, so REMX differs more from the index.
Which is cheaper, REMX or SGDM?
REMX charges 0.53% a year and SGDM charges 0.46%, so SGDM is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, REMX against SGDM, data as of Nov 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/remx-vs-sgdm

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.