Data as of Nov 4, 2026.

vsOpen in the appCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Thematic ETFs

GBUG vs SLVP: Holdings Overlap & Returns

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, GBUG returned +29.6% to SLVP's +31.0%; 25% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about GBUG and SLVP

Net assets on Nov 4, 2026: $157m for Sprott Active Gold & Silver Miners ETF and $799m for iShares MSCI Global Silver and Metals Miners ETF.

At a glance
3.6%
GBUG in the S&P 500
5.3%
SLVP in the S&P 500
+29.6%
GBUG total return, 1 year
+31.0%
SLVP total return, 1 year
GBUG · 1 year to Nov 4, 2026 96% of its weight is outside the S&P 500
96% of its weight is outside the S&P 5004% of GBUG's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 96% is outside the index. Holdings as of Nov 4, 2026.4%96%inof its weight outside the S&P 500active share 100% · top ten 40% of the fund · 43 holdings as published by its issuer for Nov 4, 2026 · Nasdaq-100: 0% in96% of its weight is outside the S&P 5004% of GBUG's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 96% is outside the index. Holdings as of Nov 4, 2026.4%96%4% of its weight in S&P 500 companiesof its weight outside the S&P 500active share 100% · Nasdaq-100: 0% in

4% of GBUG's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 96% is outside the index. Holdings as of Nov 4, 2026.

SLVP · 1 year to Nov 4, 2026 95% of its weight is outside the S&P 500
95% of its weight is outside the S&P 5005% of SLVP's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 95% is outside the index. Holdings as of Nov 3, 2026.5%95%inof its weight outside the S&P 500active share 100% · top ten 72% of the fund · 37 holdings as published by its issuer for Nov 3, 2026 · Nasdaq-100: 0% in95% of its weight is outside the S&P 5005% of SLVP's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 95% is outside the index. Holdings as of Nov 3, 2026.5%95%5% of its weight in S&P 500 companiesof its weight outside the S&P 500active share 100% · Nasdaq-100: 0% in

5% of SLVP's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 95% is outside the index. Holdings as of Nov 3, 2026.

Pair scorecard

SLVP costs 0.51 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 1.4 points; SLVP is 5.1 times larger.

Points (pts) are percentage points.

GBUG vs SLVP: Holdings Overlap & Returns
MeasureGBUGSLVP
Return
Total return, 1 year+29.6%+31.0%
Drawdown
Below its all-time high25.4%, high on Feb 27, 202633.0%, high on Feb 27, 2026
Against its benchmark
What it tracksGold minersSilver miners
Its benchmark, total return, 1 year+15.0%
Against its benchmark, 1 yearahead by 16.0 pts
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.90%0.39%
Net assets$157m$799m
Holdings
Holdings in common25%

Method

Risk and return

Feb 28, 2025 to Oct 30, 2026 · 87 weekly returns
GBUG SLVP
Return
Total return edge SLVP +112.6% +127.0%
Annualized edge SLVP (slight) +57.0% +63.2%
Price return edge SLVP +109.3% +121.7%
Risk
Volatility edge GBUG 50.9% 56.8%
Max drawdown edge GBUG (slight) −36.7% −38.8%
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe edge Tie 1.06 1.08
Sortino edge Tie 1.71 1.73
Calmar edge SLVP (slight) 1.55 1.63
Reading

From Feb 2025 to Oct 2026, SLVP returned more: +127.0% to +112.6%. GBUG swung less: 50.9% to 56.8%. GBUG fell slightly less at its worst: −36.7% to −38.8%.

Full scorecard

9 measures, with how each is measured
Open ↓
Risk and return: GBUG vs SLVP: Holdings Overlap & Returns
MeasureGBUGSLVPEdgeHow it is measured
Return
Total return+112.6%+127.0%SLVPPrice change plus distributions, reinvested.
Annualized+57.0%+63.2%SLVP (slight)Total return as a yearly rate.
Price return+109.3%+121.7%SLVPPrice change alone, distributions left out.
Risk
Volatility50.9%56.8%GBUGSpread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier.
Downside deviation31.5%35.3%GBUGLike volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate.
Max drawdown−36.7%−38.8%GBUG (slight)Deepest fall from a high to the low after it.
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe1.061.08TieReturn above Treasury bills per unit of volatility.
Sortino1.711.73TieReturn above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation.
Calmar1.551.63SLVP (slight)Annualized return divided by the max drawdown.

Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 87 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.

What they share

25%

By the books each fund has filed, GBUG and SLVP hold 25% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Nov 3, 2026 and Nov 4, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

25% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first GBUG SLVP
Discovery Mining Ltd. 4.80% 4.85%
Newmont Corp. 3.56% 5.32%
Agnico Eagle Mines Ltd. 3.26% 4.99%
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. 3.22% 4.78%
Coeur Mining Inc. 3.16% 1.64%
Endeavour Silver Corp. 1.36% 3.79%
Vizsla Silver Corp. 1.36% 1.54%
DPM Metals Inc. 5.11% 1.23%
Eldorado Gold Corp. 3.47% 1.19%
SSR Mining Inc. 1.54% 1.04%
Kinross Gold Corp. 0.87% 2.44%
Pan American Silver Corp. 0.64% 1.63%
Only in one fund ↓
Only in GBUG
G Mining Ventures Corp. 4.74%
IAMGOLD Corp. 3.99%
Northern Star Resources Ltd. 3.84%
Montage Gold Corp. 3.53%
Wesdome Gold Mines Ltd. 3.33%
Equinox Gold Corp. 3.19%
OceanaGold Corp. 3.14%
Ramelius Resources Ltd. 3.14%
Only in SLVP
HECLA MINING 13.56%
INDUST PENOLES 11.08%
FIRST MAJESTIC SILVER 10.21%
FRESNILLO PLC 8.30%
AYA GOLD & SILVER INC 5.25%
SILVERCORP METALS INC 3.21%
GOGOLD RESOURCES 1.86%
HARMONY GOLD MINING COMPANY LIMITE 1.32%
Check overlap with more funds →

Window by window

Window by window: GBUG vs SLVP: Holdings Overlap & Returns
Total returnvs its benchmark
WindowGBUGSLVPGBUGSLVP
3 months−2.1%−6.8%not measured−5.5 pts vs ACWI
6 months−5.5%−14.7%not measured−17.3 pts vs ACWI
1 year+29.6%+31.0%not measured+16.0 pts vs ACWI
3 years–+257.6%–+180.0 pts vs ACWI
Since launchNot the same days: GBUG Feb 2025 · SLVP Feb 2012+117.5%+53.4%not measured−314.3 pts vs ACWI

– means no data for this window. Open this comparison in the app →

Side by side

GBUG Sprott Active Gold & Silver Miners ETF · Holds 43 stocks in gold miners, 4% of its weight in S&P 500 companies SLVP iShares MSCI Global Silver and Metals Miners ETF · Holds 37 stocks in silver miners, 5% of its weight in S&P 500 companies
Theme Gold miners Silver miners
In the S&P 500 3.6% 5.3%
Active share vs the S&P 500 99.8% 99.8%
In the Nasdaq-100 0.0% 0.0%
Holdings 43 37
Top ten, share of the fund 39.6% 72.1%
Expense ratio 0.90% 0.39%
Fee for the differing part 0.90% 0.39%
Total return, 1 year +29.6% +31.0%
vs its benchmark not measured +16.0 pts vs ACWI
Below its high −25.4% −33.0%
Net assets $157m $799m

As of Nov 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

25% of the two portfolios are the same securities at the same weight.

Client brief:

The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.

Your saved page · Privacy.

Alert

SLVP flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
GBUG

By weight, 4% of GBUG's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 40% of the fund across 43 positions, as published by its issuer for Nov 4, 2026. Over the year to Nov 4, 2026 the fund returned +29.6% with distributions reinvested. It sits 25.4% below its all-time high of Feb 27, 2026.

SLVP

By weight, 5% of SLVP's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 72% of the fund across 37 positions, as published by its issuer for Nov 3, 2026. Over the year to Nov 4, 2026 the fund returned +31.0% with distributions reinvested against +15.0% for its benchmark, the MSCI All Country World Index, so a holder was ahead by 16.0 pts. It sits 33.0% below its all-time high of Feb 27, 2026.

Questions people ask

Do GBUG and SLVP hold the same stocks?
By their latest filings, 25% of their books are the same securities at the same weight. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.
Which is more different from the S&P 500, GBUG or SLVP?
GBUG has 4% of its weight in S&P 500 names and SLVP has 5%, so GBUG differs more from the index.
Which is cheaper, GBUG or SLVP?
GBUG charges 0.90% a year and SLVP charges 0.39%, so SLVP is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, GBUG against SLVP, data as of Nov 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/gbug-vs-slvp

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.