Data as of Nov 4, 2026.

vsOpen in the appCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Thematic ETFs

PICK vs SGDM: Holdings Overlap & Returns

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, PICK returned +28.0% to SGDM's +27.9%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about PICK and SGDM

Net assets: $2.1bn on Nov 3, 2026 for iShares MSCI Global Metals & Mining Producers ETF, and $617m on Nov 4, 2026 for Sprott Gold Miners ETF.

At a glance
12.8%
PICK in the S&P 500
8.0%
SGDM in the S&P 500
+28.0%
PICK total return, 1 year
+27.9%
SGDM total return, 1 year
PICK · 1 year to Nov 4, 2026 87% of its weight is outside the S&P 500
87% of its weight is outside the S&P 50013% of PICK's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 87% is outside the index. Holdings as of Nov 3, 2026.13%87%inof its weight outside the S&P 500active share 100% · top ten 49% of the fund · 259 holdings as published by its issuer for Nov 3, 2026 · Nasdaq-100: 0% in87% of its weight is outside the S&P 50013% of PICK's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 87% is outside the index. Holdings as of Nov 3, 2026.13%87%inof its weight outside the S&P 500active share 100% · Nasdaq-100: 0% in

13% of PICK's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 87% is outside the index. Holdings as of Nov 3, 2026.

SGDM · 1 year to Nov 4, 2026 92% of its weight is outside the S&P 500
92% of its weight is outside the S&P 5008% of SGDM's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 92% is outside the index. Holdings as of Nov 4, 2026.8%92%inof its weight outside the S&P 500active share 100% · top ten 56% of the fund · 48 holdings as published by its issuer for Nov 4, 2026 · Nasdaq-100: 0% in92% of its weight is outside the S&P 5008% of SGDM's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 92% is outside the index. Holdings as of Nov 4, 2026.8%92%8% of its weight in S&P 500 companiesof its weight outside the S&P 500active share 100% · Nasdaq-100: 0% in

8% of SGDM's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 92% is outside the index. Holdings as of Nov 4, 2026.

Pair scorecard

PICK costs 0.07 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 0.1 points; PICK is 3.6 times larger.

Points (pts) are percentage points.

PICK vs SGDM: Holdings Overlap & Returns
MeasurePICKSGDM
Return
Total return, 1 year+28.0%+27.9%
Drawdown
Below its all-time high18.4%, high on Jun 2, 202625.6%, high on Mar 2, 2026
Against its benchmark
What it tracksMiners and metalsGold miners
Its benchmark, total return, 1 year+15.0%
Against its benchmark, 1 yearahead by 13.0 pts
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.39%0.46%
Net assets$2.2bn$617m
Holdings
Holdings in common0%

Method

Risk and return

Jul 25, 2014 to Oct 30, 2026 · 640 weekly returns
PICK SGDM
Return
Total return edge SGDM +118.4% +182.9%
Annualized edge SGDM +6.6% +8.8%
Price return edge SGDM +29.0% +156.9%
Risk
Volatility edge PICK 29.8% 37.5%
Max drawdown edge SGDM −62.8% −52.3%
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe edge SGDM 0.29 0.36
Sortino edge SGDM 0.43 0.53
Calmar edge SGDM 0.10 0.17
Reading

From Jul 2014 to Oct 2026, SGDM returned more: +182.9% to +118.4%. PICK swung less: 29.8% to 37.5%. SGDM fell less at its worst: −52.3% to −62.8%.

Full scorecard

9 measures, with how each is measured
Open ↓
Risk and return: PICK vs SGDM: Holdings Overlap & Returns
MeasurePICKSGDMEdgeHow it is measured
Return
Total return+118.4%+182.9%SGDMPrice change plus distributions, reinvested.
Annualized+6.6%+8.8%SGDMTotal return as a yearly rate.
Price return+29.0%+156.9%SGDMPrice change alone, distributions left out.
Risk
Volatility29.8%37.5%PICKSpread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier.
Downside deviation20.3%25.3%PICKLike volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate.
Max drawdown−62.8%−52.3%SGDMDeepest fall from a high to the low after it.
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe0.290.36SGDMReturn above Treasury bills per unit of volatility.
Sortino0.430.53SGDMReturn above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation.
Calmar0.100.17SGDMAnnualized return divided by the max drawdown.

Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 640 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, PICK and SGDM hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Nov 3, 2026 and Nov 4, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first PICK SGDM
RIO TINTO 6.07% 0.07%
COLLECTIVE MINING 0.04% 0.07%
Only in one fund ↓
Only in PICK
BHP GROUP LTD 13.95%
FREEPORT MCMORAN INC 6.19%
GLENCORE PLC 4.43%
NUCOR 4.24%
ANGLO AMERICAN PLC 3.69%
CIA VALE DO RIO DOCE SH 2.80%
RIO TINTO 2.63%
GRUPO MEXICO B 2.44%
Only in SGDM
Agnico Eagle Mines Ltd. 10.02%
Newmont Corp. 8.00%
Barrick Mining Corp. 7.73%
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. 7.10%
Franco-Nevada Corp. 6.17%
Kinross Gold Corp. 3.85%
Lundin Gold Inc. 3.58%
Pan American Silver Corp. 3.45%
Check overlap with more funds →

Window by window

Window by window: PICK vs SGDM: Holdings Overlap & Returns
Total returnvs its benchmark
WindowPICKSGDMPICKSGDM
3 months−11.8%+2.7%−10.5 pts vs ACWInot measured
6 months−12.8%−5.9%−15.4 pts vs ACWInot measured
1 year+28.0%+27.9%+13.0 pts vs ACWInot measured
3 years+57.0%+198.6%−20.6 pts vs ACWInot measured
Since launchNot the same days: PICK Feb 2012 · SGDM Jul 2014+93.0%+219.4%−274.7 pts vs ACWInot measured

Open this comparison in the app →

Side by side

PICK iShares MSCI Global Metals & Mining Producers ETF · Holds 259 stocks in miners and metals, 13% of its weight in S&P 500 companies SGDM Sprott Gold Miners ETF · Holds 48 stocks in gold miners, 8% of its weight in S&P 500 companies
Theme Miners and metals Gold miners
In the S&P 500 12.8% 8.0%
Active share vs the S&P 500 99.7% 99.8%
In the Nasdaq-100 0.0% 0.0%
Holdings 259 48
Top ten, share of the fund 48.8% 56.0%
Expense ratio 0.39% 0.46%
Fee for the differing part 0.39% 0.46%
Total return, 1 year +28.0% +27.9%
vs its benchmark +13.0 pts vs ACWI not measured
Below its high −18.4% −25.6%
Net assets, PICK as of Nov 3, 2026 and SGDM as of Nov 4, 2026 $2.1bn $617m

As of Nov 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

0% of the two portfolios are the same securities at the same weight.

Client brief:

The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.

Your saved page · Privacy.

Alert

PICK flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
PICK

By weight, 13% of PICK's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 49% of the fund across 259 positions, as published by its issuer for Nov 3, 2026. Over the year to Nov 4, 2026 the fund returned +28.0% with distributions reinvested against +15.0% for its benchmark, the MSCI All Country World Index, so a holder was ahead by 13.0 pts. It sits 18.4% below its all-time high of Jun 2, 2026.

SGDM

By weight, 8% of SGDM's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 56% of the fund across 48 positions, as published by its issuer for Nov 4, 2026. Over the year to Nov 4, 2026 the fund returned +27.9% with distributions reinvested. It sits 25.6% below its all-time high of Mar 2, 2026.

Questions people ask

Do PICK and SGDM hold the same stocks?
By their latest filings, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.
Which is more different from the S&P 500, PICK or SGDM?
PICK has 13% of its weight in S&P 500 names and SGDM has 8%, so SGDM differs more from the index.
Which is cheaper, PICK or SGDM?
PICK charges 0.39% a year and SGDM charges 0.46%, so PICK is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, PICK against SGDM, data as of Nov 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/pick-vs-sgdm

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.