Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

PICK vs RING: which is really different?

PICK and RING hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and PICK returned more over the year.

iShares MSCI Global Metals & Mining Producers ETF and iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF.

11.8%PICK in the S&P 500
16.4%RING in the S&P 500
+49.6%PICK total return, 1 year
+45.3%RING total return, 1 year

ETFIQ Off-Index Score: RING scores higher

How much of it is not the index it is sold as an alternative to?

PICK 74RING 77.70.1, the lowest in this set91.8, the highest

A percentile among the 379 thematic ETFs with a holdings filing. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All thematic ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed

PICK88% of its weight is outside the S&P 500 · 1 year to Sep 18, 2026
12%88%inof its weight outside the S&P 500active share 100% · top ten 47% of the fund · 279 holdings filed Sep 17, 2026 · Nasdaq-100: 0% in12%88%inof its weight outside the S&P 500active share 100% · top ten 47% of the fund
RING84% of its weight is outside the S&P 500 · 1 year to Sep 18, 2026
16%84%in the S&P 500of its weight outside the S&P 500active share 100% · top ten 67% of the fund · 55 holdings filed Sep 17, 2026 · Nasdaq-100: 0% in16%84%inof its weight outside the S&P 500active share 100% · top ten 67% of the fund

0% of the two portfolios are the same securities at the same weight.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, PICK and RING hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions PICK and RING both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingPICKRING
AUD CASH0.44%0.08%
BLK CSH FND TREASURY SL AGENCY0.10%0.08%
CAD CASH0.01%0.10%
GBP CASH0.14%0.01%
HKD CASH0.02%0.01%
CNH CASH0.00%0.00%
IDR CASH0.00%0.00%
TRY CASH0.00%0.00%
USD CASH0.00%0.05%
ZAR CASH0.03%0.00%
Only in each
Only in PICKOnly in RING
BHP GROUP LTD 13.44%NEWMONT 16.36%
RIO TINTO PLC 6.27%AGNICO EAGLE MINES 12.29%
FREEPORT MCMORAN INC 6.26%BARRICK MINING 8.16%
GLENCORE PLC 4.26%WHEATON PRECIOUS METALS 7.58%
ANGLO AMERICAN PLC 3.41%GOLD FIELDS 4.35%
NUCOR 3.36%ANGLOGOLD ASHANTI PLC 4.28%
CIA VALE DO RIO DOCE SH 3.17%KINROSS GOLD 4.25%
RIO TINTO LTD 2.69%COEUR MINING 3.38%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Sep 18, 2026.

Performance, window by window

PICK and RING over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnvs the S&P 500vs the Nasdaq-100
PICKRINGPICKRINGPICKRING
3 months−1.8%+17.9%−4.0 pts+15.6 pts+0.7 pts+20.3 pts
6 months+20.2%+21.9%+2.2 pts+3.9 pts−4.0 pts−2.3 pts
1 year+49.6%+45.3%+33.1 pts+28.7 pts+27.9 pts+23.5 pts
3 years+67.1%+286.7%−11.3 pts+208.3 pts−31.1 pts+188.5 pts
Since launch+114.0%+97.9%−527.4 pts−543.5 pts−1122.5 pts−1138.6 pts
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
PICK and RING on the same fields, as of Sep 18, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
PICK
iShares MSCI Global Metals & Mining Producers ETF
Holds 279 stocks in miners and metals, 12% of its weight in S&P 500 companies
RING
iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF
Holds 55 stocks in gold miners, 16% of its weight in S&P 500 companies
IssueriSharesiShares
ThemeMiners and metalsGold miners
In the S&P 50011.8%16.4%
Active share vs the S&P 50099.7%99.8%
In the Nasdaq-1000.0%0.0%
Holdings27955
Top ten, share of the fund47.2%67.0%
Expense ratio0.39%0.39%
Fee for the differing part0.39%0.39%
Total return, 1 year+49.6%+45.3%
vs the S&P 500+33.1 pts+28.7 pts
vs the Nasdaq-100+27.9 pts+23.5 pts
Below its high−9.6%−14.8%
Net assets$2.5bn$2.5bn

PICK in plain words

By weight, 12% of PICK's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 47% of the fund across 279 positions, as published by its issuer for Sep 18, 2026. Over the year to Sep 18, 2026 the fund returned +49.6% with distributions reinvested against +16.6% for the S&P 500, so a holder was ahead by 33.1 pts. It sits 9.6% below its all-time high of Jun 2, 2026.

RING in plain words

By weight, 16% of RING's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 67% of the fund across 55 positions, as published by its issuer for Sep 18, 2026. Over the year to Sep 18, 2026 the fund returned +45.3% with distributions reinvested against +16.6% for the S&P 500, so a holder was ahead by 28.7 pts. It sits 14.8% below its all-time high of Feb 27, 2026.

Questions people ask

Do PICK and RING hold the same stocks?
By their latest filings, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight, which is mostly different names. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.
Which is more different from the S&P 500, PICK or RING?
PICK has 12% of its weight in S&P 500 names and RING has 16%, so RING differs more from the index.
Which is cheaper, PICK or RING?
PICK charges 0.39% a year and RING charges 0.39%, so PICK is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

PICK against RING, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 18, 2026. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, PICK against RING, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/pick-vs-ring Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources