NLR vs URNJ: which is really different?

NLR and URNJ hold 23% of their weight in the same names, and NLR returned −21.8% over the year. VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF and Sprott Junior Uranium Miners ETF.

15.8%
NLR in the S&P 500
0.0%
URNJ in the S&P 500
−21.8%
NLR total return, 1 year
−25.9%
URNJ total return, 1 year
NLR · 1 year to Sep 30, 202684% of its weight is outside the S&P 500
84% of its weight is outside the S&P 50016% of NLR's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 84% is outside the index16%84%in the S&P 500of its weight outside the S&P 500active share 100% · top ten 62% of the fund · 25 holdings filed Sep 30, 2026 · Nasdaq-100: 8% in84% of its weight is outside the S&P 50016% of NLR's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 84% is outside the index16%84%inof its weight outside the S&P 500active share 100% · top ten 62% of the fund

16% of NLR's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 84% is outside the index

URNJ · 1 year to Sep 30, 2026100% of its weight is outside the S&P 500
100% of its weight is outside the S&P 5000% of URNJ's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 100% is outside the index0%100%0% of its weight in S&P 500 companiesof its weight outside the S&P 500active share 100% · top ten 73% of the fund · 41 holdings filed Jun 30, 2026 · Nasdaq-100: 0% in100% of its weight is outside the S&P 5000% of URNJ's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 100% is outside the index0%100%0% of its weight in S&P 500 companiesof its weight outside the S&P 500active share 100% · top ten 73% of the fund

0% of URNJ's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 100% is outside the index

ETFIQ Off-Index Score · URNJ scores higherHow much of it is not the index it is sold as an alternative to?
0.1, the lowest in this set92.0, the highest

A percentile among the 375 thematic ETFs with a holdings filing. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All thematic ETFs ranked by it → How it is computed →

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, NLR and URNJ hold 23% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Sep 30, 2026.

half

23% in common

Positions both hold, largest shared weight first
Holding NLR URNJ
Nexgen Energy Ltd 5.57% 12.17%
Denison Mines Corp 4.10% 12.56%
Paladin Energy Ltd 4.05% 11.29%
Energy Fuels Inc/Canada 4.03% 11.37%
Cgn Mining Co Ltd 1.68% 4.30%
Deep Yellow Ltd 1.05% 4.81%
Isoenergy Ltd 0.80% 4.69%
Boss Energy Ltd 0.69% 2.78%
Ur-Energy Inc 0.66% 4.75%
Only in NLR
Constellation Energy Corp 8.17%
Cameco Corp 8.16%
Public Service Enterprise Group Inc 7.67%
Fortum Oyj 7.17%
Bwx Technologies Inc 6.20%
Cgn Power Co Ltd 5.28%
Oklo Inc 5.14%
Nac Kazatomprom Jsc 4.56%
Only in URNJ
Bannerman Energy Ltd 3.76%
Atha Energy Corp 2.76%
Encore Energy Corp 2.63%
Global Atomic Corp 2.38%
Alligator Energy Ltd 1.75%
Mega Uranium Ltd 1.61%
Eagle Nuclear Energy Corp 1.38%
Berkeley Energia Ltd 1.29%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed.

23% of the two portfolios are the same securities at the same weight.

Performance, window by window

Total returnvs the S&P 500vs the Nasdaq-100
WindowNLRURNJNLRURNJNLRURNJ
3 months−9.9%−13.7%−12.4 pts−16.2 pts−12.1 pts−15.8 pts
6 months−23.0%−32.4%−40.0 pts−49.4 pts−49.9 pts−59.3 pts
1 year−21.8%−25.9%−37.5 pts−41.6 pts−45.6 pts−49.7 pts
3 years+57.6%−1.6%−27.4 pts−86.6 pts−52.4 pts−111.6 pts
Since launch
NLR Jan 2010 · URNJ Feb 2023
+158.9%+13.7%−645.7 pts−78.2 pts−1578.6 pts−128.7 pts

NLR and URNJ over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ. Open the live comparison on ETFIQ →

On the same fields

NLR
VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF · Holds 25 stocks in nuclear and uranium, 16% of its weight in S&P 500 companies
URNJ
Sprott Junior Uranium Miners ETF · Holds 41 stocks in nuclear and uranium, 0% of its weight in S&P 500 companies
Issuer VanEck Sprott
Theme Nuclear and uranium Nuclear and uranium
In the S&P 500 15.8% 0.0%
Active share vs the S&P 500 99.8% 100.0%
In the Nasdaq-100 8.2% 0.0%
Holdings 25 41
Top ten, share of the fund 62.3% 72.5%
Expense ratio 0.52% 0.80%
Fee for the differing part 0.52% 0.80%
Total return, 1 year −21.8% −25.9%
vs the S&P 500 −37.5 pts −41.6 pts
vs the Nasdaq-100 −45.6 pts −49.7 pts
Below its high −37.1% −50.1%
Net assets $3.5bn $310m

NLR and URNJ on the same fields, as of Sep 30, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

NLR in plain words

By weight, 16% of NLR's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 62% of the fund across 25 positions, as published by its issuer for Sep 30, 2026. Over the year to Sep 30, 2026 the fund returned −21.8% with distributions reinvested against +15.7% for the S&P 500, so a holder was behind by 37.5 pts. It sits 37.1% below its all-time high of Jan 28, 2026.

URNJ in plain words

By weight, 0% of URNJ's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 72% of the fund across 41 positions, as filed for Jun 30, 2026. Over the year to Sep 30, 2026 the fund returned −25.9% with distributions reinvested against +15.7% for the S&P 500, so a holder was behind by 41.6 pts. It sits 50.1% below its all-time high of Jan 28, 2026.

Questions people ask

Do NLR and URNJ hold the same stocks?
By their latest filings, 23% of their books are the same securities at the same weight, which is a meaningful overlap. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.
Which is more different from the S&P 500, NLR or URNJ?
NLR has 16% of its weight in S&P 500 names and URNJ has 0%, so URNJ differs more from the index.
Which is cheaper, NLR or URNJ?
NLR charges 0.52% a year and URNJ charges 0.80%, so NLR is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Cite this page

ETFIQ, NLR against URNJ, data as of Sep 30, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/nlr-vs-urnj

Open data

Free to use with attribution. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology.