Do NUKZ and URNJ hold the same stocks?

By their latest filings, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight, which is mostly different names. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.

Which is more different from the S&P 500, NUKZ or URNJ?

NUKZ has 23% of its weight in S&P 500 names and URNJ has 0%, so URNJ differs more from the index.

Which is cheaper, NUKZ or URNJ?

NUKZ charges 0.85% a year and URNJ charges 0.80%, so URNJ is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Share on X Download as PDF Open live

NUKZ vs URNJ: which is really different?

NUKZ and URNJ hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and NUKZ returned −6.6% over the year. Range Nuclear Renaissance Index ETF and Sprott Junior Uranium Miners ETF.

23.1%

NUKZ in the S&P 500

0.0%

URNJ in the S&P 500

−6.6%

NUKZ total return, 1 year

−25.9%

URNJ total return, 1 year

NUKZ · 1 year to Sep 30, 202677% of its weight is outside the S&P 500

23% of NUKZ's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 77% is outside the index

URNJ · 1 year to Sep 30, 2026100% of its weight is outside the S&P 500

0% of URNJ's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 100% is outside the index

ETFIQ Off-Index Score · URNJ scores higherHow much of it is not the index it is sold as an alternative to?

NUKZ 57.6

URNJ 92

0.1, the lowest in this set92.0, the highest

A percentile among the 375 thematic ETFs with a holdings filing. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All thematic ETFs ranked by it → How it is computed →

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, NUKZ and URNJ hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.

50%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold, largest shared weight first

Holding NUKZ URNJ

Only in NUKZ

CAMECO CORPORATION 9.10%

SAMSUNG C&T CORPORATION 3.45%

GE VERNOVA INC. 3.34%

TALEN ENERGY CORP 3.27%

ROLLS-ROYCE HOLDINGS PLC 3.02%

CEZ, a.s. 2.98%

Dominion Energy, Inc. 2.92%

Endesa, Sociedad Anonima 2.87%

Only in URNJ

Denison Mines Corp 12.56%

Nexgen Energy Ltd 12.17%

Energy Fuels Inc/canada 11.37%

Paladin Energy Ltd 11.29%

Deep Yellow Ltd 4.81%

Ur-energy Inc 4.75%

Isoenergy Ltd 4.69%

Cgn Mining Co Ltd 4.30%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed.

0% of the two portfolios are the same securities at the same weight.

Performance, window by window

	Total return		vs the S&P 500		vs the Nasdaq-100
Window	NUKZ	URNJ	NUKZ	URNJ	NUKZ	URNJ
3 months	−9.9%	−13.7%	−12.4 pts	−16.2 pts	−12.0 pts	−15.8 pts
6 months	−10.4%	−32.4%	−27.4 pts	−49.4 pts	−37.3 pts	−59.3 pts
1 year	−6.6%	−25.9%	−22.3 pts	−41.6 pts	−30.4 pts	−49.7 pts
3 years	not published	−1.6%	not published	−86.6 pts	not published	−111.6 pts
Since launch NUKZ Jan 2024 · URNJ Feb 2023	+142.1%	+13.7%	+79.8 pts	−78.2 pts	+65.8 pts	−128.7 pts

NUKZ and URNJ over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ. Open the live comparison on ETFIQ →

On the same fields

NUKZ

Range Nuclear Renaissance Index ETF · Holds 46 stocks in nuclear and uranium, 23% of its weight in S&P 500 companies

URNJ

Sprott Junior Uranium Miners ETF · Holds 41 stocks in nuclear and uranium, 0% of its weight in S&P 500 companies

Issuer Range Sprott

Theme Nuclear and uranium Nuclear and uranium

In the S&P 500 23.1% 0.0%

Active share vs the S&P 500 98.7% 100.0%

In the Nasdaq-100 2.6% 0.0%

Holdings 46 41

Top ten, share of the fund 36.4% 72.5%

Expense ratio 0.85% 0.80%

Fee for the differing part 0.86% 0.80%

Total return, 1 year −6.6% −25.9%

vs the S&P 500 −22.3 pts −41.6 pts

vs the Nasdaq-100 −30.4 pts −49.7 pts

Below its high −21.0% −50.1%

Net assets $890m $310m

NUKZ and URNJ on the same fields, as of Sep 30, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

NUKZ in plain words

By weight, 23% of NUKZ's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 99%. The top ten holdings are 36% of the fund across 46 positions, as filed for May 31, 2026. Over the year to Sep 30, 2026 the fund returned −6.6% with distributions reinvested against +15.7% for the S&P 500, so a holder was behind by 22.3 pts. It sits 21.0% below its all-time high of May 6, 2026.

URNJ in plain words

By weight, 0% of URNJ's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 72% of the fund across 41 positions, as filed for Jun 30, 2026. Over the year to Sep 30, 2026 the fund returned −25.9% with distributions reinvested against +15.7% for the S&P 500, so a holder was behind by 41.6 pts. It sits 50.1% below its all-time high of Jan 28, 2026.

Questions people ask

Do NUKZ and URNJ hold the same stocks?: By their latest filings, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight, which is mostly different names. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.
Which is more different from the S&P 500, NUKZ or URNJ?: NUKZ has 23% of its weight in S&P 500 names and URNJ has 0%, so URNJ differs more from the index.
Which is cheaper, NUKZ or URNJ?: NUKZ charges 0.85% a year and URNJ charges 0.80%, so URNJ is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

NUKZ vs URAN NUKZ vs TNUK NUKZ vs URNM NUKZ vs UX URNJ vs URNM URNJ vs UX URNJ vs RCTR URNJ vs SMRF

NUKZ on its own →URNJ on its own →How every figure is computed →Standards and sources →

Where these figures came from

NUKZ filings on SEC EDGAR ↗NUKZ prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗Range website ↗URNJ filings on SEC EDGAR ↗URNJ prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗Sprott page for URNJ ↗

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page

ETFIQ, NUKZ against URNJ, data as of Sep 30, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/nukz-vs-urnj

Open data

Free to use with attribution. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology.