Data as of Nov 4, 2026.
LENS vs QQQJ: Holdings Overlap & Returns
Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, LENS returned +28.3% to QQQJ's +25.2%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about LENS and QQQJNet assets: $67m on Aug 31, 2026 for Sarmaya Thematic ETF, and $1.2bn on Nov 3, 2026 for Invesco NASDAQ Next Gen 100 ETF.
16% of LENS's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 84% is outside the index. Holdings as of Aug 31, 2026.
47% of QQQJ's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 53% is outside the index. Holdings as of Nov 3, 2026.
Pair scorecard
QQQJ costs 0.64 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 3.1 points.
Points (pts) are percentage points.
| Measure | LENS | QQQJ |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +28.3% | +25.2% |
| Drawdown | ||
| Below its all-time high | 17.6%, high on Feb 27, 2026 | |
| Against its benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | Broad innovation and megatrends | Broad innovation and megatrends |
| Its benchmark, total return, 1 year | +14.3% | +14.8% |
| Against its benchmark, 1 year | ahead by 14.0 pts | ahead by 10.4 pts |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.79% | 0.15% |
| Net assets, LENS as of Aug 31, 2026 and QQQJ as of Nov 3, 2026 | $67m | $1.2bn |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 0% | |
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, LENS and QQQJ hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Aug 31, 2026 and Nov 3, 2026.
half
0% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Window by window
| Total return | vs its benchmark | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Window | LENS | QQQJ | LENS | QQQJ |
| 3 months | −0.5% | −1.2% | −0.3 pts vs BKLC | −0.9 pts vs IWV |
| 6 months | −7.8% | +6.2% | −12.7 pts vs BKLC | +1.3 pts vs IWV |
| 1 year | +28.3% | +25.2% | +14.0 pts vs BKLC | +10.4 pts vs IWV |
| 3 years | – | +91.2% | – | +10.2 pts vs IWV |
| Since launchNot the same days: LENS Jan 2025 · QQQJ Oct 2020 | +68.9% | +74.3% | +39.1 pts vs BKLC | −53.2 pts vs IWV |
– means no data for this window. Open this comparison in the app →
Side by side
As of Nov 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
0% of the two portfolios are the same securities at the same weight.
LENS
By weight, 16% of LENS's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 99%. The top ten holdings are 40% of the fund across 45 positions, as filed for Aug 31, 2026. Over the year to Nov 4, 2026 the fund returned +28.3% with distributions reinvested against +14.3% for its benchmark, the Solactive GBS United States 500 Index, so a holder was ahead by 14.0 pts. It sits 17.6% below its all-time high of Feb 27, 2026.
Over the year to Nov 4, 2026 the fund returned +25.2% with distributions reinvested against +14.8% for its benchmark, the Russell 3000 Index, so a holder was ahead by 10.4 pts.
By weight, 47% of QQQJ's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 99%. The top ten holdings are 20% of the fund across 106 positions, as published by its issuer for Nov 3, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Do LENS and QQQJ hold the same stocks?
- By their latest filings, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Every number is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, LENS against QQQJ, data as of Nov 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/lens-vs-qqqj
ETFIQ. (Nov 4, 2026). LENS against QQQJ. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/lens-vs-qqqj
[LENS against QQQJ (ETFIQ, Nov 4, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/lens-vs-qqqj)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.