Data as of Nov 4, 2026.
LENS vs LFSC: Holdings Overlap & Returns
Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, LENS returned +28.3% to LFSC's +43.6%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about LENS and LFSC
Net assets on Aug 31, 2026: $67m for Sarmaya Thematic ETF and $126m for F/m Emerald Life Sciences Innovation ETF.
16% of LENS's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 84% is outside the index. Holdings as of Aug 31, 2026.
0% of LFSC's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 100% is outside the index. Holdings as of Aug 31, 2026.
Pair scorecard
LFSC costs 0.25 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 15.3 points; LFSC is 1.9 times larger.
Points (pts) are percentage points.
| Measure | LENS | LFSC |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +28.3% | +43.6% |
| Drawdown | ||
| Below its all-time high | 17.6%, high on Feb 27, 2026 | 5.7%, high on Aug 19, 2026 |
| Against its benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | Broad innovation and megatrends | Broad innovation and megatrends |
| Its benchmark, total return, 1 year | +14.3% | +14.8% |
| Against its benchmark, 1 year | ahead by 14.0 pts | ahead by 28.8 pts |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.79% | 0.54% |
| Net assets, as of Aug 31, 2026 | $67m | $126m |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 0% | |
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, LENS and LFSC hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Aug 31, 2026.
half
0% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Window by window
| Total return | vs its benchmark | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Window | LENS | LFSC | LENS | LFSC |
| 3 months | −0.5% | −3.8% | −0.3 pts vs BKLC | −3.5 pts vs IWV |
| 6 months | −7.8% | +16.9% | −12.7 pts vs BKLC | +12.0 pts vs IWV |
| 1 year | +28.3% | +43.6% | +14.0 pts vs BKLC | +28.8 pts vs IWV |
| Since launchNot the same days: LENS Jan 2025 · LFSC Oct 2024 | +68.9% | +83.4% | +39.1 pts vs BKLC | +46.4 pts vs IWV |
Side by side
As of Nov 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
0% of the two portfolios are the same securities at the same weight.
LENS
By weight, 16% of LENS's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 99%. The top ten holdings are 40% of the fund across 45 positions, as filed for Aug 31, 2026. Over the year to Nov 4, 2026 the fund returned +28.3% with distributions reinvested against +14.3% for its benchmark, the Solactive GBS United States 500 Index, so a holder was ahead by 14.0 pts. It sits 17.6% below its all-time high of Feb 27, 2026.
Over the year to Nov 4, 2026 the fund returned +43.6% with distributions reinvested against +14.8% for its benchmark, the Russell 3000 Total Return, so a holder was ahead by 28.8 pts.
By weight, 0% of LFSC's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 54% of the fund across 38 positions, as filed for Aug 31, 2026. It sits 5.7% below its all-time high of Aug 19, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Do LENS and LFSC hold the same stocks?
- By their latest filings, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Every number is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, LENS against LFSC, data as of Nov 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/lens-vs-lfsc
ETFIQ. (Nov 4, 2026). LENS against LFSC. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/lens-vs-lfsc
[LENS against LFSC (ETFIQ, Nov 4, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/lens-vs-lfsc)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.