Data as of .
LENS vs LFSC: which is really different?
LENS and LFSC hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and LFSC returned more over the year.
ETFIQ Off-Index Score: LFSC scores higher
How much of it is not the index it is sold as an alternative to?
A percentile among the 379 thematic ETFs with a holdings filing. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All thematic ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed
0% of the two portfolios are the same securities at the same weight.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, LENS and LFSC hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Only in LENS | Only in LFSC |
|---|---|
| SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust 9.04% | Travere Therapeutics Inc 7.66% |
| iShares Gold Trust Micro 5.81% | Cogent Biosciences Inc 7.52% |
| Chevron Corp 4.22% | LivaNova PLC 7.11% |
| Exxon Mobil Corp 4.22% | Spyre Therapeutics Inc 6.41% |
| iShares Silver Trust 4.22% | Guardant Health Inc 5.51% |
| Kinross Gold Corp 3.96% | Mirum Pharmaceuticals Inc 4.92% |
| Agnico Eagle Mines Ltd 3.03% | Corcept Therapeutics Inc 4.79% |
| Gold Fields Ltd 2.85% | United Therapeutics Corp 4.15% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated May 29, 2026 and May 31, 2026.
Performance, window by window
| Window | Total return | vs the S&P 500 | vs the Nasdaq-100 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LENS | LFSC | LENS | LFSC | LENS | LFSC | |
| 3 months | +12.1% | +8.7% | +9.9 pts | +6.5 pts | +14.6 pts | +11.2 pts |
| 6 months | +6.7% | +36.0% | −11.3 pts | +17.9 pts | −17.5 pts | +11.7 pts |
| 1 year | +46.4% | +53.0% | +29.8 pts | +36.5 pts | +24.6 pts | +31.3 pts |
| Since launch | +84.9% | +81.3% | +55.8 pts | +44.3 pts | +45.4 pts | +30.9 pts |
| LENS Sarmaya Thematic ETF Holds 43 stocks in broad innovation and megatrends, 22% of its weight in S&P 500 companies | LFSC F/m Emerald Life Sciences Innovation ETF Holds 39 stocks in broad innovation and megatrends, 0% of its weight in S&P 500 companies | |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | Sarmaya | F/m |
| Theme | Broad innovation and megatrends | Broad innovation and megatrends |
| In the S&P 500 | 21.7% | 0.0% |
| Active share vs the S&P 500 | 97.9% | 100.0% |
| In the Nasdaq-100 | 1.7% | 0.6% |
| Holdings | 43 | 39 |
| Top ten, share of the fund | 42.3% | 54.7% |
| Expense ratio | 0.79% | 0.54% |
| Fee for the differing part | 0.81% | 0.54% |
| Total return, 1 year | +46.4% | +53.0% |
| vs the S&P 500 | +29.8 pts | +36.5 pts |
| vs the Nasdaq-100 | +24.6 pts | +31.3 pts |
| Below its high | −9.8% | −6.8% |
| Net assets | $53m | $105m |
LENS in plain words
By weight, 22% of LENS's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 98%. The top ten holdings are 42% of the fund across 43 positions, as filed for May 29, 2026. Over the year to Sep 18, 2026 the fund returned +46.4% with distributions reinvested against +16.6% for the S&P 500, so a holder was ahead by 29.8 pts. It sits 9.8% below its all-time high of Feb 27, 2026.
LFSC in plain words
By weight, 0% of LFSC's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 55% of the fund across 39 positions, as filed for May 31, 2026. Over the year to Sep 18, 2026 the fund returned +53.0% with distributions reinvested against +16.6% for the S&P 500, so a holder was ahead by 36.5 pts. It sits 6.8% below its all-time high of Aug 19, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Do LENS and LFSC hold the same stocks?
- By their latest filings, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight, which is mostly different names. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.
- Which is more different from the S&P 500, LENS or LFSC?
- LENS has 22% of its weight in S&P 500 names and LFSC has 0%, so LFSC differs more from the index.
- Which is cheaper, LENS or LFSC?
- LENS charges 0.79% a year and LFSC charges 0.54%, so LFSC is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, LENS against LFSC, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/lens-vs-lfsc Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.