Do LEGR and TCAN hold the same stocks?

By their latest filings, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight, which is mostly different names. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.

Which is more different from the S&P 500, LEGR or TCAN?

LEGR has 39% of its weight in S&P 500 names and TCAN has 0%, so TCAN differs more from the index.

Which is cheaper, LEGR or TCAN?

LEGR charges 0.65% a year and TCAN charges 0.50%, so TCAN is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Share on X Download as PDF Open live

LEGR vs TCAN: which is really different?

LEGR and TCAN hold 0% of their weight in the same names. First Trust Indxx Innovative Transaction & Process ETF and 21Shares Canton Network ETF.

39.4%

LEGR in the S&P 500

0.0%

TCAN in the S&P 500

+18.2%

LEGR total return, 1 year

−13.6%

TCAN total return, since launch

LEGR · 1 year to Sep 30, 202661% of its weight is outside the S&P 500

39% of LEGR's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 61% is outside the index

TCAN · 3 months to Sep 30, 2026100% of its weight is outside the S&P 500

0% of TCAN's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 100% is outside the index

ETFIQ Off-Index Score · TCAN scores higherHow much of it is not the index it is sold as an alternative to?

LEGR 11.3

TCAN 92

0.1, the lowest in this set92.0, the highest

A percentile among the 375 thematic ETFs with a holdings filing. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All thematic ETFs ranked by it → How it is computed →

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, LEGR and TCAN hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Sep 30, 2026.

50%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold, largest shared weight first

Holding LEGR TCAN

Only in LEGR

Meta Platforms, Inc. (Class A) 1.33%

Bank of Communications Co., Ltd. (Class H) 1.23%

Postal Savings Bank of China Co., Ltd. (Class H) 1.22%

Workday, Inc. (Class A) 1.22%

Bank of China Ltd. 1.21%

HDFC Bank Ltd. (ADR) 1.21%

Anz Group Holdings Ltd 1.20%

BOC Hong Kong (Holdings) Limited 1.20%

Only in TCAN

21Shares AG 53.31%

Canton Coin 46.69%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed.

0% of the two portfolios are the same securities at the same weight.

Performance, window by window

	Total return		vs the S&P 500		vs the Nasdaq-100
Window	LEGR	TCAN	LEGR	TCAN	LEGR	TCAN
3 months	+2.6%	−10.4%	+0.1 pts	−12.9 pts	+0.5 pts	−12.5 pts
6 months	+13.3%	not published	−3.6 pts	not published	−13.5 pts	not published
1 year	+18.2%	not published	+2.5 pts	not published	−5.6 pts	not published
3 years	+88.2%	not published	+3.2 pts	not published	−21.8 pts	not published
Since launch LEGR Jan 2018 · TCAN May 2026	+158.6%	−13.6%	−49.0 pts	−18.3 pts	−206.7 pts	−20.3 pts

LEGR and TCAN over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ. Open the live comparison on ETFIQ →

On the same fields

LEGR

First Trust Indxx Innovative Transaction & Process ETF · Holds 111 stocks in stablecoins and tokenisation, 39% of its weight in S&P 500 companies

TCAN

21Shares Canton Network ETF · Holds 2 stocks in stablecoins and tokenisation, 0% of its weight in S&P 500 companies

Issuer First Trust 21Shares

Theme Stablecoins and tokenisation Stablecoins and tokenisation

In the S&P 500 39.4% 0.0%

Active share vs the S&P 500 80.5% 100.0%

In the Nasdaq-100 16.6% 0.0%

Holdings 111 2

Top ten, share of the fund 12.2% 100.0%

Expense ratio 0.65% 0.50%

Fee for the differing part 0.81% 0.50%

Total return, 1 year +18.2% −13.6% (since launch on May 7, 2026)

vs the S&P 500 +2.5 pts −18.3 pts

vs the Nasdaq-100 −5.6 pts −20.3 pts

Below its high −3.6% −24.6%

Net assets $127m $9m

LEGR and TCAN on the same fields, as of Sep 30, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

LEGR in plain words

By weight, 39% of LEGR's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 80%. The top ten holdings are 12% of the fund across 111 positions, as published by its issuer for Sep 30, 2026. Over the year to Sep 30, 2026 the fund returned +18.2% with distributions reinvested against +15.7% for the S&P 500, so a holder was ahead by 2.5 pts.

TCAN in plain words

By weight, 0% of TCAN's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 100% of the fund across 2 positions, as filed for Jun 30, 2026. Since it launched on May 7, 2026 the fund returned −13.6% with distributions reinvested against +4.8% for the S&P 500, so a holder was behind by 18.3 pts. It sits 24.6% below its all-time high of May 15, 2026.

Questions people ask

Do LEGR and TCAN hold the same stocks?: By their latest filings, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight, which is mostly different names. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.
Which is more different from the S&P 500, LEGR or TCAN?: LEGR has 39% of its weight in S&P 500 names and TCAN has 0%, so TCAN differs more from the index.
Which is cheaper, LEGR or TCAN?: LEGR charges 0.65% a year and TCAN charges 0.50%, so TCAN is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

LEGR vs NODE LEGR vs STBQ LEGR vs TKNQ TCAN vs TKNQ TCAN vs NODE TCAN vs STBQ

LEGR on its own →TCAN on its own →How every figure is computed →Standards and sources →

Where these figures came from

LEGR filings on SEC EDGAR ↗LEGR prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗First Trust page for LEGR ↗TCAN filings on SEC EDGAR ↗TCAN prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗21Shares page for TCAN ↗

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page

ETFIQ, LEGR against TCAN, data as of Sep 30, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/legr-vs-tcan

Open data

Free to use with attribution. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology.