LEGR vs STBQ: which is really different?

LEGR and STBQ hold 3% of their weight in the same names. First Trust Indxx Innovative Transaction & Process ETF and Amplify Stablecoin Technology Leaders ETF.

39.4%
LEGR in the S&P 500
17.8%
STBQ in the S&P 500
+18.2%
LEGR total return, 1 year
−7.8%
STBQ total return, since launch
LEGR · 1 year to Sep 30, 202661% of its weight is outside the S&P 500
61% of its weight is outside the S&P 50039% of LEGR's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 61% is outside the index39%61%of its weight in S&P 500 companiesof its weight outside the S&P 500active share 81% · top ten 12% of the fund · 111 holdings filed Sep 30, 2026 · Nasdaq-100: 17% in61% of its weight is outside the S&P 50039% of LEGR's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 61% is outside the index39%61%in the S&P 500outside the S&P 500active share 81% · top ten 12% of the fund

39% of LEGR's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 61% is outside the index

STBQ · 6 months to Sep 30, 202682% of its weight is outside the S&P 500
82% of its weight is outside the S&P 50018% of STBQ's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 82% is outside the index18%82%in the S&P 500of its weight outside the S&P 500active share 98% · top ten 50% of the fund · 29 holdings filed Oct 1, 2026 · Nasdaq-100: 4% in82% of its weight is outside the S&P 50018% of STBQ's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 82% is outside the index18%82%inof its weight outside the S&P 500active share 98% · top ten 50% of the fund

18% of STBQ's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 82% is outside the index

ETFIQ Off-Index Score · STBQ scores higherHow much of it is not the index it is sold as an alternative to?
0.1, the lowest in this set92.0, the highest

A percentile among the 375 thematic ETFs with a holdings filing. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All thematic ETFs ranked by it → How it is computed →

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, LEGR and STBQ hold 3% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Oct 1, 2026 and Sep 30, 2026.

half

3% in common

Positions both hold, largest shared weight first
Holding LEGR STBQ
PayPal Holdings, Inc. 0.88% 3.65%
Visa Inc. (Class A) 0.88% 3.65%
Mastercard Incorporated 0.87% 3.27%
Only in LEGR
Meta Platforms, Inc. (Class A) 1.33%
Bank of Communications Co., Ltd. (Class H) 1.23%
Postal Savings Bank of China Co., Ltd. (Class H) 1.22%
Workday, Inc. (Class A) 1.22%
Bank of China Ltd. 1.21%
HDFC Bank Ltd. (ADR) 1.21%
Anz Group Holdings Ltd 1.20%
BOC Hong Kong (Holdings) Limited 1.20%
Only in STBQ
Stablecoinx Inc 8.09%
Grayscale Chainlink Trust ETF 5.69%
Bitwise Solana Staking ETF 5.46%
Invesco Government & Agency Portfolio 12/31/2031 5.43%
iShares Ethereum Trust ETF 5.14%
Bitwise XRP ETF 5.04%
Marqeta Inc 3.89%
Coinbase Global Inc 3.87%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed.

3% of the two portfolios are the same securities at the same weight.

Performance, window by window

Total returnvs the S&P 500vs the Nasdaq-100
WindowLEGRSTBQLEGRSTBQLEGRSTBQ
3 months+2.6%+13.3%+0.1 pts+10.8 pts+0.5 pts+11.2 pts
6 months+13.3%+18.2%−3.6 pts+1.2 pts−13.5 pts−8.7 pts
1 year+18.2%not published+2.5 ptsnot published−5.6 ptsnot published
3 years+88.2%not published+3.2 ptsnot published−21.8 ptsnot published
Since launch
LEGR Jan 2018 · STBQ Dec 2025
+158.6%−7.8%−49.0 pts−19.5 pts−206.7 pts−27.1 pts

LEGR and STBQ over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ. Open the live comparison on ETFIQ →

On the same fields

LEGR
First Trust Indxx Innovative Transaction & Process ETF · Holds 111 stocks in stablecoins and tokenisation, 39% of its weight in S&P 500 companies
STBQ
Amplify Stablecoin Technology Leaders ETF · Holds 29 stocks in stablecoins and tokenisation, 18% of its weight in S&P 500 companies
Issuer First Trust Amplify
Theme Stablecoins and tokenisation Stablecoins and tokenisation
In the S&P 500 39.4% 17.8%
Active share vs the S&P 500 80.5% 98.3%
In the Nasdaq-100 16.6% 3.7%
Holdings 111 29
Top ten, share of the fund 12.2% 49.9%
Expense ratio 0.65% 0.69%
Fee for the differing part 0.81% 0.70%
Total return, 1 year +18.2% −7.8% (since launch on Dec 23, 2025)
vs the S&P 500 +2.5 pts −19.5 pts
vs the Nasdaq-100 −5.6 pts −27.1 pts
Below its high −3.6% −14.1%
Net assets $127m $2m

LEGR and STBQ on the same fields, as of Sep 30, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

LEGR in plain words

By weight, 39% of LEGR's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 80%. The top ten holdings are 12% of the fund across 111 positions, as published by its issuer for Sep 30, 2026. Over the year to Sep 30, 2026 the fund returned +18.2% with distributions reinvested against +15.7% for the S&P 500, so a holder was ahead by 2.5 pts.

STBQ in plain words

By weight, 18% of STBQ's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 98%. The top ten holdings are 50% of the fund across 29 positions, as published by its issuer for Oct 1, 2026. Since it launched on Dec 23, 2025 the fund returned −7.8% with distributions reinvested against +11.7% for the S&P 500, so a holder was behind by 19.5 pts. It sits 14.1% below its all-time high of Jan 14, 2026.

Questions people ask

Do LEGR and STBQ hold the same stocks?
By their latest filings, 3% of their books are the same securities at the same weight, which is mostly different names. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.
Which is more different from the S&P 500, LEGR or STBQ?
LEGR has 39% of its weight in S&P 500 names and STBQ has 18%, so STBQ differs more from the index.
Which is cheaper, LEGR or STBQ?
LEGR charges 0.65% a year and STBQ charges 0.69%, so LEGR is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Cite this page

ETFIQ, LEGR against STBQ, data as of Sep 30, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/legr-vs-stbq

Open data

Free to use with attribution. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology.