Data as of .
KMCA vs PEXL: which is really different?
KMCA and PEXL hold 0% of their weight in the same names.
ETFIQ Off-Index Score: KMCA scores higher
How much of it is not the index it is sold as an alternative to?
A percentile among the 379 thematic ETFs with a holdings filing. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All thematic ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed
0% of the two portfolios are the same securities at the same weight.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, KMCA and PEXL hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Only in KMCA | Only in PEXL |
|---|---|
| SAMSUNG ELECTRO MECHANICS 15.17% | Broadcom Inc 5.75% |
| SK HYNIX INC 12.17% | Alphabet Inc 5.64% |
| SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO LTD 8.01% | Advanced Micro Devices Inc 5.43% |
| DAEDUCK ELECTRONICS CO LTD 6.62% | Apple Inc 4.81% |
| ISUPETASYS COMPANY LTD 3.80% | Microsoft Corp 4.56% |
| SAMSUNG SDI COMPANY LTD 3.72% | Meta Platforms Inc 4.41% |
| HANMI SEMICONDUCTOR COMPANY LTD 3.25% | Netflix Inc 3.71% |
| RAINBOW ROBOTICS INC 2.80% | Procter & Gamble Co/The 3.21% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.
Performance, window by window
| Window | Total return | vs the S&P 500 | vs the Nasdaq-100 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| KMCA | PEXL | KMCA | PEXL | KMCA | PEXL | |
| 3 months | −19.3% | −4.7% | −21.5 pts | −6.9 pts | −16.8 pts | −2.2 pts |
| 6 months | not published | +22.1% | not published | +4.1 pts | not published | −2.1 pts |
| 1 year | not published | +25.5% | not published | +8.9 pts | not published | +3.7 pts |
| 3 years | not published | +71.4% | not published | −7.0 pts | not published | −26.7 pts |
| Since launch | −12.4% | +196.6% | −17.0 pts | −9.9 pts | −16.3 pts | −125.0 pts |
| KMCA PLUS Korea Manufacturing Core Alliance Index ETF Holds 35 stocks in reshoring and manufacturing, 0% of its weight in S&P 500 companies | PEXL Pacer US Export Leaders ETF Holds 100 stocks in reshoring and manufacturing, 97% of its weight in S&P 500 companies | |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | PLUS | Pacer |
| Theme | Reshoring and manufacturing | Reshoring and manufacturing |
| In the S&P 500 | 0.0% | 97.3% |
| Active share vs the S&P 500 | 100.0% | 68.8% |
| In the Nasdaq-100 | 0.0% | 63.4% |
| Holdings | 35 | 100 |
| Top ten, share of the fund | 60.8% | 43.5% |
| Expense ratio | 0.65% | 0.49% |
| Fee for the differing part | 0.65% | 0.71% |
| Total return, 1 year | −12.4% (since launch on May 7, 2026) | +25.5% |
| vs the S&P 500 | −17.0 pts | +8.9 pts |
| vs the Nasdaq-100 | −16.3 pts | +3.7 pts |
| Below its high | −20.2% | −5.1% |
| Net assets | $3m | $46m |
KMCA in plain words
By weight, 0% of KMCA's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 61% of the fund across 35 positions, as filed for May 31, 2026. Since it launched on May 7, 2026 the fund returned −12.4% with distributions reinvested against +4.6% for the S&P 500, so a holder was behind by 17.0 pts. It sits 20.2% below its all-time high of Jun 1, 2026.
PEXL in plain words
By weight, 97% of PEXL's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 69%. The top ten holdings are 44% of the fund across 100 positions, as filed for Apr 30, 2026. Over the year to Sep 18, 2026 the fund returned +25.5% with distributions reinvested against +16.6% for the S&P 500, so a holder was ahead by 8.9 pts. It sits 5.1% below its all-time high of Jun 30, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Do KMCA and PEXL hold the same stocks?
- By their latest filings, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight, which is mostly different names. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.
- Which is more different from the S&P 500, KMCA or PEXL?
- KMCA has 0% of its weight in S&P 500 names and PEXL has 97%, so KMCA differs more from the index.
- Which is cheaper, KMCA or PEXL?
- KMCA charges 0.65% a year and PEXL charges 0.49%, so PEXL is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, KMCA against PEXL, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/kmca-vs-pexl Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.