Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsOpen in the appCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Thematic ETFs

ITA vs URA: Holdings Overlap & Returns

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, ITA returned −4.3% to URA's −30.3%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about ITA and URA

Net assets: $12.0bn on Oct 27, 2026 for iShares U.S. Aerospace & Defense ETF, and $5.4bn on Oct 12, 2026 for Global X Uranium ETF.

At a glance
80.8%
ITA in the S&P 500
0.0%
URA in the S&P 500
−4.3%
ITA total return, 1 year
−30.3%
URA total return, 1 year
ITA · 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 19% of its weight is outside the S&P 500
19% of its weight is outside the S&P 50081% of ITA's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 19% is outside the index. Holdings as of Oct 27, 2026.81%19%of its weight in S&P 500 companiesoutside the S&P 500active share 98% · top ten 76% of the fund · 51 holdings as published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026 · Nasdaq-100: 3% in19% of its weight is outside the S&P 50081% of ITA's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 19% is outside the index. Holdings as of Oct 27, 2026.81%19%in the S&P 50019% of its weight outside the S&P 500active share 98% · Nasdaq-100: 3% in

81% of ITA's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 19% is outside the index. Holdings as of Oct 27, 2026.

URA · 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 100% of its weight is outside the S&P 500
100% of its weight is outside the S&P 5000% of URA's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 100% is outside the index. Holdings as of Jul 31, 2026.0%100%0% of its weight in S&P 500 companiesof its weight outside the S&P 500active share 100% · top ten 63% of the fund · 57 holdings as filed for Jul 31, 2026 · Nasdaq-100: 0% in100% of its weight is outside the S&P 5000% of URA's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 100% is outside the index. Holdings as of Jul 31, 2026.0%100%0% of its weight in S&P 500 companiesof its weight outside the S&P 500active share 100% · Nasdaq-100: 0% in

0% of URA's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 100% is outside the index. Holdings as of Jul 31, 2026.

Pair scorecard

ITA costs 0.32 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 26.0 points; ITA is 2.2 times larger.

Points (pts) are percentage points.

ITA vs URA: Holdings Overlap & Returns
MeasureITAURA
Return
Total return, 1 year−4.3%−30.3%
Drawdown
Below its all-time high17.9%, high on Aug 14, 202658.4%, high on Feb 2, 2011
Against its benchmark
What it tracksDefenseNuclear and uranium
Its benchmark, total return, 1 year+13.4%
Against its benchmark, 1 yearbehind by 43.7 pts
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.37%0.69%
Net assets, as of Oct 12, 2026$12.0bn$5.4bn
Holdings
Holdings in common0%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method

Risk and return

Nov 12, 2010 to Oct 23, 2026 · 832 weekly returns
ITA URA
Return
Total return edge ITA +771.2% −51.4%
Annualized edge ITA +14.5% −4.4%
Price return edge ITA +629.7% −68.7%
Risk
Volatility edge ITA 22.2% 36.8%
Max drawdown edge ITA −49.3% −93.2%
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe edge ITA 0.65 0.02
Sortino edge ITA 0.95 0.02
Calmar edge ITA 0.29 −0.05
Reading

ITA returned more: +771.2% to −51.4%. ITA swung less: 22.2% to 36.8%. ITA fell less at its worst: −49.3% to −93.2%.

Full scorecard

9 measures, with how each is measured
Open ↓
Risk and return: ITA vs URA: Holdings Overlap & Returns
MeasureITAURAEdgeHow it is measured
Return
Total return+771.2%−51.4%ITAPrice change plus distributions, reinvested.
Annualized+14.5%−4.4%ITATotal return as a yearly rate.
Price return+629.7%−68.7%ITAPrice change alone, distributions left out.
Risk
Volatility22.2%36.8%ITASpread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier.
Downside deviation15.2%25.0%ITALike volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate.
Max drawdown−49.3%−93.2%ITADeepest fall from a high to the low after it.
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe0.650.02ITAReturn above Treasury bills per unit of volatility.
Sortino0.950.02ITAReturn above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation.
Calmar0.29−0.05ITAAnnualized return divided by the max drawdown.

Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 832 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, ITA and URA hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first ITA URA
Only in one fund ↓
Only in ITA
GE AEROSPACE 20.09%
RTX 17.06%
BOEING 6.81%
LOCKHEED MARTIN 5.66%
NORTHROP GRUMMAN CORP 5.09%
GENERAL DYNAMICS CORP 4.79%
TRANSDIGM GROUP 4.78%
HONEYWELL AEROSPACE INC 4.16%
Only in URA
CAMECO CORPORATION 22.18%
Sprott Physical Uranium Trust 6.74%
Oklo Inc 6.09%
NEXGEN ENERGY LTD. 6.07%
URANIUM ENERGY CORP. 4.81%
Joint stock company National atomic company Kazatomprom 4.40%
CENTRUS ENERGY CORP. 3.46%
PALADIN ENERGY LTD 3.14%
Check overlap with more funds →

Window by window

Window by window: ITA vs URA: Holdings Overlap & Returns
Total returnvs its benchmark
WindowITAURAITAURA
3 months−12.0%−2.6%not measured−7.0 pts vs ACWI
6 months−2.4%−30.9%not measured−38.3 pts vs ACWI
1 year−4.3%−30.3%not measured−43.7 pts vs ACWI
3 years+97.8%+65.5%not measured−23.4 pts vs ACWI
Since launchNot the same days: ITA May 2006 · URA Nov 2010+892.2%−45.1%not measured−417.4 pts vs ACWI

Open this comparison in the app →

Side by side

ITA iShares U.S. Aerospace & Defense ETF · Holds 51 stocks in defense, 81% of its weight in S&P 500 companies URA Global X Uranium ETF · Holds 57 stocks in nuclear and uranium, 0% of its weight in S&P 500 companies
Theme Defense Nuclear and uranium
In the S&P 500 80.8% 0.0%
Active share vs the S&P 500 97.7% 100.0%
In the Nasdaq-100 2.7% 0.0%
Holdings 51 57
Top ten, share of the fund 76.1% 63.0%
Expense ratio 0.37% 0.69%
Fee for the differing part 0.38% 0.69%
Total return, 1 year −4.3% −30.3%
vs its benchmark not measured −43.7 pts vs ACWI
Below its high −17.9% −58.4%
Net assets, ITA as of Oct 27, 2026 and URA as of Oct 12, 2026 $12.0bn $5.4bn

As of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

0% of the two portfolios are the same securities at the same weight.

Client brief · page 1 of 2 Report BR-2F802FB4D1

ITA and URA are built for the same job. How do they differ in cost, holdings and results?

  1. Theme. ITA covers Defense and URA covers Nuclear and uranium.
  2. Concentration. The top ten holdings are 76.1% of ITA and 63.0% of URA, a gap of 13.1 points.
  3. What each follows. ITA follows Defense and URA follows Nuclear and uranium.

Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.

Your saved page · Privacy.

Alert

ITA flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
ITA

By weight, 81% of ITA's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 98%. The top ten holdings are 76% of the fund across 51 positions, as published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 the fund returned −4.3% with distributions reinvested. It sits 17.9% below its all-time high of Aug 14, 2026.

URA

By weight, 0% of URA's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 63% of the fund across 57 positions, as filed for Jul 31, 2026. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 the fund returned −30.3% with distributions reinvested against +13.4% for its benchmark, the MSCI ACWI Index, so a holder was behind by 43.7 pts. It sits 58.4% below its all-time high of Feb 2, 2011.

Questions people ask

Do ITA and URA hold the same stocks?
By their latest filings, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.
Which is more different from the S&P 500, ITA or URA?
ITA has 81% of its weight in S&P 500 names and URA has 0%, so URA differs more from the index.
Which is cheaper, ITA or URA?
ITA charges 0.37% a year and URA charges 0.69%, so ITA is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, ITA against URA, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/ita-vs-ura

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.