Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsOpen in the appCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Thematic ETFs

ITA vs QTUM: Holdings Overlap & Returns

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, ITA returned −4.3% to QTUM's +28.9%; 5% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about ITA and QTUM

Net assets on Oct 27, 2026: $12.0bn for iShares U.S. Aerospace & Defense ETF and $5.4bn for Defiance Quantum ETF.

At a glance
80.8%
ITA in the S&P 500
37.5%
QTUM in the S&P 500
−4.3%
ITA total return, 1 year
+28.9%
QTUM total return, 1 year
ITA · 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 19% of its weight is outside the S&P 500
19% of its weight is outside the S&P 50081% of ITA's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 19% is outside the index. Holdings as of Oct 27, 2026.81%19%of its weight in S&P 500 companiesoutside the S&P 500active share 98% · top ten 76% of the fund · 51 holdings as published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026 · Nasdaq-100: 3% in19% of its weight is outside the S&P 50081% of ITA's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 19% is outside the index. Holdings as of Oct 27, 2026.81%19%in the S&P 50019% of its weight outside the S&P 500active share 98% · Nasdaq-100: 3% in

81% of ITA's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 19% is outside the index. Holdings as of Oct 27, 2026.

QTUM · 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 63% of its weight is outside the S&P 500
63% of its weight is outside the S&P 50038% of QTUM's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 63% is outside the index. Holdings as of Oct 28, 2026.38%63%of its weight in S&P 500 companiesof its weight outside the S&P 500active share 82% · top ten 19% of the fund · 85 holdings as published by its issuer for Oct 28, 2026 · Nasdaq-100: 28% in63% of its weight is outside the S&P 50038% of QTUM's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 63% is outside the index. Holdings as of Oct 28, 2026.38%63%in the S&P 500outside the S&P 500active share 82% · Nasdaq-100: 28% in

38% of QTUM's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 63% is outside the index. Holdings as of Oct 28, 2026.

Pair scorecard

ITA costs 0.03 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 33.2 points; ITA is 2.2 times larger.

ITA vs QTUM: Holdings Overlap & Returns
MeasureITAQTUM
Return
Total return, 1 year−4.3%+28.9%
Drawdown
Below its all-time high17.9%, high on Aug 14, 202614.3%, high on Jun 2, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksDefenseQuantum computing
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.37%0.40%
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026$12.0bn$5.4bn
Holdings
Holdings in common5%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund76%18%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 27, 2026 and Oct 28, 2026. Method

Risk and return

Sep 14, 2018 to Oct 23, 2026 · 423 weekly returns
ITA QTUM
Return
Total return edge QTUM +103.8% +489.3%
Annualized edge QTUM +9.1% +24.4%
Price return edge QTUM +88.1% +450.1%
Risk
Volatility edge QTUM (slight) 26.8% 26.3%
Max drawdown edge QTUM −49.3% −38.1%
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe edge QTUM 0.36 0.86
Sortino edge QTUM 0.51 1.28
Calmar edge QTUM 0.19 0.64
Reading

QTUM returned more: +489.3% to +103.8%. QTUM swung slightly less: 26.3% to 26.8%. QTUM fell less at its worst: −38.1% to −49.3%.

Full scorecard

9 measures, with how each is measured
Open ↓
Risk and return: ITA vs QTUM: Holdings Overlap & Returns
MeasureITAQTUMEdgeHow it is measured
Return
Total return+103.8%+489.3%QTUMPrice change plus distributions, reinvested.
Annualized+9.1%+24.4%QTUMTotal return as a yearly rate.
Price return+88.1%+450.1%QTUMPrice change alone, distributions left out.
Risk
Volatility26.8%26.3%QTUM (slight)Spread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier.
Downside deviation18.8%17.6%QTUM (slight)Like volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate.
Max drawdown−49.3%−38.1%QTUMDeepest fall from a high to the low after it.
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe0.360.86QTUMReturn above Treasury bills per unit of volatility.
Sortino0.511.28QTUMReturn above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation.
Calmar0.190.64QTUMAnnualized return divided by the max drawdown.

Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 423 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.

What they share

5%

By the books each fund has filed, ITA and QTUM hold 5% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Oct 27, 2026 and Oct 28, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

5% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first ITA QTUM
LOCKHEED MARTIN 5.66% 1.46%
RTX 17.06% 1.34%
NORTHROP GRUMMAN CORP 5.09% 1.24%
HONEYWELL AEROSPACE INC 4.16% 0.52%
Only in one fund ↓
Only in ITA
GE AEROSPACE 20.09%
BOEING 6.81%
GENERAL DYNAMICS CORP 4.79%
TRANSDIGM GROUP 4.78%
HOWMET AEROSPACE 3.93%
L3HARRIS TECHNOLOGIES 3.77%
AXON ENTERPRISE 2.70%
ROCKET LAB CORP 2.51%
Only in QTUM
Global Unichip Corp 2.43%
Elastic Nv 2.14%
Horizon Quantum Holdings Ltd 1.86%
Palantir Technologies Inc 1.84%
Nutanix Inc 1.78%
Cloudflare Inc 1.77%
Snowflake Inc 1.73%
Arqit Quantum Inc 1.72%
Check overlap with more funds →

Window by window

Window by window: ITA vs QTUM: Holdings Overlap & Returns
Total return
WindowITAQTUM
3 months−12.0%+9.1%
6 months−2.4%+11.2%
1 year−4.3%+28.9%
3 years+97.8%+229.7%
Since launchNot the same days: ITA May 2006 · QTUM Sep 2018+892.2%+522.8%

Open this comparison in the app →

Side by side

ITA iShares U.S. Aerospace & Defense ETF · Holds 51 stocks in defense, 81% of its weight in S&P 500 companies QTUM Defiance Quantum ETF · Holds 85 stocks in quantum computing, 38% of its weight in S&P 500 companies
Theme Defense Quantum computing
In the S&P 500 80.8% 37.5%
Active share vs the S&P 500 97.7% 82.2%
In the Nasdaq-100 2.7% 28.0%
Holdings 51 85
Top ten, share of the fund 76.1% 18.5%
Expense ratio 0.37% 0.40%
Fee for the differing part 0.38% 0.49%
Total return, 1 year −4.3% +28.9%
vs its benchmark not measured not measured
Below its high −17.9% −14.3%
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026 $12.0bn $5.4bn

As of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

5% of the two portfolios are the same securities at the same weight.

Client brief · page 1 of 2 Report BR-B3F3BEAF13

ITA and QTUM are built for the same job. How do they differ in cost, holdings and results?

  1. Theme. ITA covers Defense and QTUM covers Quantum computing.
  2. Concentration. The top ten holdings are 76.1% of ITA and 18.5% of QTUM, a gap of 57.6 points.
  3. What each follows. ITA follows Defense and QTUM follows Quantum computing.

Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.

Your saved page · Privacy.

Alert

ITA flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
ITA

By weight, 81% of ITA's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 98%. The top ten holdings are 76% of the fund across 51 positions, as published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 the fund returned −4.3% with distributions reinvested. It sits 17.9% below its all-time high of Aug 14, 2026.

QTUM

By weight, 38% of QTUM's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 82%. The top ten holdings are 18% of the fund across 85 positions, as published by its issuer for Oct 28, 2026. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 the fund returned +28.9% with distributions reinvested. It sits 14.3% below its all-time high of Jun 2, 2026.

Questions people ask

Do ITA and QTUM hold the same stocks?
By their latest filings, 5% of their books are the same securities at the same weight. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.
Which is more different from the S&P 500, ITA or QTUM?
ITA has 81% of its weight in S&P 500 names and QTUM has 38%, so ITA differs more from the index.
Which is cheaper, ITA or QTUM?
ITA charges 0.37% a year and QTUM charges 0.40%, so ITA is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, ITA against QTUM, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/ita-vs-qtum

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.