Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsOpen in the appCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Thematic ETFs

URA vs XAR: Holdings Overlap & Returns

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, URA returned −30.3% to XAR's −10.0%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about URA and XAR

Net assets: $5.4bn on Oct 12, 2026 for Global X Uranium ETF, and $5.0bn on Oct 27, 2026 for State Street SPDR S&P Aerospace & Defense ETF.

At a glance
0.0%
URA in the S&P 500
39.7%
XAR in the S&P 500
−30.3%
URA total return, 1 year
−10.0%
XAR total return, 1 year
URA · 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 100% of its weight is outside the S&P 500
100% of its weight is outside the S&P 5000% of URA's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 100% is outside the index. Holdings as of Jul 31, 2026.0%100%0% of its weight in S&P 500 companiesof its weight outside the S&P 500active share 100% · top ten 63% of the fund · 57 holdings as filed for Jul 31, 2026 · Nasdaq-100: 0% in100% of its weight is outside the S&P 5000% of URA's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 100% is outside the index. Holdings as of Jul 31, 2026.0%100%0% of its weight in S&P 500 companiesof its weight outside the S&P 500active share 100% · Nasdaq-100: 0% in

0% of URA's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 100% is outside the index. Holdings as of Jul 31, 2026.

XAR · 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 60% of its weight is outside the S&P 500
60% of its weight is outside the S&P 50040% of XAR's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 60% is outside the index. Holdings as of Oct 27, 2026.40%60%of its weight in S&P 500 companiesof its weight outside the S&P 500active share 98% · top ten 32% of the fund · 50 holdings as published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026 · Nasdaq-100: 3% in60% of its weight is outside the S&P 50040% of XAR's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 60% is outside the index. Holdings as of Oct 27, 2026.40%60%in the S&P 500outside the S&P 500active share 98% · Nasdaq-100: 3% in

40% of XAR's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 60% is outside the index. Holdings as of Oct 27, 2026.

Pair scorecard

XAR costs 0.34 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 20.3 points.

Points (pts) are percentage points.

URA vs XAR: Holdings Overlap & Returns
MeasureURAXAR
Return
Total return, 1 year−30.3%−10.0%
Drawdown
Below its all-time high58.4%, high on Feb 2, 201124.1%, high on Aug 14, 2026
Against its benchmark
What it tracksNuclear and uraniumDefense
Against the S&P 500, 1 yearbehind by 23.7 pts
Its benchmark, total return, 1 year+13.4%+13.7%
Against its benchmark, 1 yearbehind by 43.7 ptsbehind by 23.7 pts
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.69%0.35%
Net assets, as of Oct 12, 2026$5.4bn$5.4bn
Holdings
Holdings in common0%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method

Risk and return

Oct 7, 2011 to Oct 23, 2026 · 785 weekly returns
URA XAR
Return
Total return edge XAR +5.3% +905.6%
Annualized edge XAR +0.3% +16.5%
Price return edge XAR −30.8% +760.2%
Risk
Volatility edge XAR 36.1% 23.3%
Max drawdown edge XAR −86.1% −45.1%
Downside capture 127.6% 107.2%
Beta 1.31 1.16
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe edge XAR 0.14 0.70
Sortino edge XAR 0.21 1.05
Treynor 0.005 0.141
Calmar edge XAR 0.00 0.37
Against the benchmark
Alpha −11.7% a year +0.3% a year
Alpha t-stat −1.54 0.08
Information ratio −0.29 0.17
Tracking error 30.7% 14.6%

Each against its own benchmark: URA against ACWI, Nov 12, 2010 to Oct 23, 2026; XAR against VOO, Oct 7, 2011 to Oct 23, 2026.

Reading

XAR returned more: +905.6% to +5.3%. XAR swung less: 23.3% to 36.1%. XAR fell less at its worst: −45.1% to −86.1%.

Full scorecard

19 measures, with how each is measured
Open ↓
Risk and return: URA vs XAR: Holdings Overlap & Returns
MeasureURAXAREdgeHow it is measured
Return
Total return+5.3%+905.6%XARPrice change plus distributions, reinvested.
Annualized+0.3%+16.5%XARTotal return as a yearly rate.
Price return−30.8%+760.2%XARPrice change alone, distributions left out.
Risk
Volatility36.1%23.3%XARSpread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier.
Downside deviation23.8%15.5%XARLike volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate.
Max drawdown−86.1%−45.1%XARDeepest fall from a high to the low after it.
Upside capture120.6%115.9%Share of its benchmark's rise caught in the weeks it rose.
Downside capture127.6%107.2%Share of its benchmark's fall taken in the weeks it fell. Lower is better.
Beta1.311.16Not an edgeHow far it moves for each 1% its benchmark moves.
R squared0.320.62Not an edgeShare of its weekly moves its benchmark explains.
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe0.140.70XARReturn above Treasury bills per unit of volatility.
Sortino0.211.05XARReturn above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation.
Treynor0.0050.141Return above Treasury bills per unit of beta.
Calmar0.000.37XARAnnualized return divided by the max drawdown.
Against the benchmark
BenchmarkACWIVOOThe ETF each fund is measured against.
Alpha−11.7% a year+0.3% a yearNot significantYearly return beyond what its beta to the benchmark predicts.
Alpha t-stat−1.540.08Not an edgeHow sure the alpha is. Below 2, it could be chance.
Alpha range−26.6% to +3.2%−7.0% to +7.6%Includes zeroThe 95% range for the yearly alpha.
Information ratio−0.290.17Return against its benchmark per unit of tracking error.
Tracking error30.7%14.6%Not an edgeHow far weekly returns stray from the benchmark, annualized.

Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 785 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, URA and XAR hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first URA XAR
Only in one fund ↓
Only in URA
CAMECO CORPORATION 22.18%
Sprott Physical Uranium Trust 6.74%
Oklo Inc 6.09%
NEXGEN ENERGY LTD. 6.07%
URANIUM ENERGY CORP. 4.81%
Joint stock company National atomic company Kazatomprom 4.40%
CENTRUS ENERGY CORP. 3.46%
PALADIN ENERGY LTD 3.14%
Only in XAR
LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP 3.69%
HONEYWELL AEROSPACE INC 3.44%
NORTHROP GRUMMAN CORP 3.32%
L3HARRIS TECHNOLOGIES INC 3.21%
GENERAL DYNAMICS CORP 3.12%
TRANSDIGM GROUP INC 3.12%
HUNTINGTON INGALLS INDUSTRIE 3.11%
HEICO CORP 3.07%
Check overlap with more funds →

Window by window

Window by window: URA vs XAR: Holdings Overlap & Returns
Total returnvs its benchmark
WindowURAXARURAXAR
3 months−2.6%−12.8%−7.0 pts vs ACWI−18.9 pts vs VOO
6 months−30.9%−9.9%−38.3 pts vs ACWI−19.0 pts vs VOO
1 year−30.3%−10.0%−43.7 pts vs ACWI−23.7 pts vs VOO
3 years+65.5%+103.5%−23.4 pts vs ACWI+8.0 pts vs VOO
Since launchNot the same days: URA Nov 2010 · XAR Sep 2011−45.1%+945.4%−417.4 pts vs ACWI+171.9 pts vs VOO

Open this comparison in the app →

Side by side

URA Global X Uranium ETF · Holds 57 stocks in nuclear and uranium, 0% of its weight in S&P 500 companies XAR State Street SPDR S&P Aerospace & Defense ETF · Holds 50 stocks in defense, 40% of its weight in S&P 500 companies
Theme Nuclear and uranium Defense
In the S&P 500 0.0% 39.7%
Active share vs the S&P 500 100.0% 97.7%
In the Nasdaq-100 0.0% 2.7%
Holdings 57 50
Top ten, share of the fund 63.0% 32.2%
Expense ratio 0.69% 0.35%
Fee for the differing part 0.69% 0.36%
Total return, 1 year −30.3% −10.0%
vs its benchmark −43.7 pts vs ACWI −23.7 pts vs VOO
Below its high −58.4% −24.1%
Net assets, URA as of Oct 12, 2026 and XAR as of Oct 27, 2026 $5.4bn $5.0bn

As of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

0% of the two portfolios are the same securities at the same weight.

Client brief · page 1 of 2 Report BR-F12587F457

URA and XAR are built for the same job. How do they differ in cost, holdings and results?

  1. Theme. URA covers Nuclear and uranium and XAR covers Defense.
  2. Concentration. The top ten holdings are 63.0% of URA and 32.2% of XAR, a gap of 30.8 points.
  3. What each follows. URA follows Nuclear and uranium and XAR follows Defense.

Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.

Your saved page · Privacy.

Alert

XAR flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
URA

By weight, 0% of URA's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 63% of the fund across 57 positions, as filed for Jul 31, 2026. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 the fund returned −30.3% with distributions reinvested against +13.4% for its benchmark, the MSCI ACWI Index, so a holder was behind by 43.7 pts. It sits 58.4% below its all-time high of Feb 2, 2011.

XAR

By weight, 40% of XAR's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 98%. The top ten holdings are 32% of the fund across 50 positions, as published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 the fund returned −10.0% with distributions reinvested against +13.7% for its benchmark, the S&P 500 Index, so a holder was behind by 23.7 pts. It sits 24.1% below its all-time high of Aug 14, 2026.

Questions people ask

Do URA and XAR hold the same stocks?
By their latest filings, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.
Which is more different from the S&P 500, URA or XAR?
URA has 0% of its weight in S&P 500 names and XAR has 40%, so URA differs more from the index.
Which is cheaper, URA or XAR?
URA charges 0.69% a year and XAR charges 0.35%, so XAR is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, URA against XAR, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/ura-vs-xar

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.