ICOP vs POWR: which is really different?
ICOP and POWR hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and ICOP returned +44.3% over the year. iShares Copper and Metals Mining ETF and iShares U.S. Power Infrastructure ETF.
13% of ICOP's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 87% is outside the index
81% of POWR's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 20% is outside the index
A percentile among the 375 thematic ETFs with a holdings filing. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All thematic ETFs ranked by it → How it is computed →
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, ICOP and POWR hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Sep 29, 2026 and Sep 30, 2026.
half
0% in common
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed.
0% of the two portfolios are the same securities at the same weight.
Performance, window by window
| Total return | vs the S&P 500 | vs the Nasdaq-100 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Window | ICOP | POWR | ICOP | POWR | ICOP | POWR |
| 3 months | +9.6% | −11.1% | +7.1 pts | −13.6 pts | +7.5 pts | −13.2 pts |
| 6 months | +8.9% | −7.6% | −8.0 pts | −24.6 pts | −17.9 pts | −34.5 pts |
| 1 year | +44.3% | +2.8% | +28.5 pts | −12.9 pts | +20.5 pts | −20.9 pts |
| 3 years | +137.4% | +8.7% | +52.4 pts | −76.3 pts | +27.4 pts | −101.3 pts |
| Since launch ICOP Jun 2023 · POWR Feb 2012 | +134.9% | +64.8% | +51.7 pts | −577.6 pts | +27.1 pts | −1207.1 pts |
ICOP and POWR over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ. Open the live comparison on ETFIQ →
On the same fields
ICOP and POWR on the same fields, as of Sep 30, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
ICOP in plain words
By weight, 13% of ICOP's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 62% of the fund across 87 positions, as published by its issuer for Sep 29, 2026. Over the year to Sep 30, 2026 the fund returned +44.3% with distributions reinvested against +15.7% for the S&P 500, so a holder was ahead by 28.5 pts. It sits 12.6% below its all-time high of Aug 25, 2026.
POWR in plain words
By weight, 80% of POWR's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 97%. The top ten holdings are 48% of the fund across 82 positions, as published by its issuer for Sep 30, 2026. Over the year to Sep 30, 2026 the fund returned +2.8% with distributions reinvested against +15.7% for the S&P 500, so a holder was behind by 12.9 pts. It sits 13.8% below its all-time high of May 5, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Do ICOP and POWR hold the same stocks?
- By their latest filings, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight, which is mostly different names. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.
ETFIQ, ICOP against POWR, data as of Sep 30, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/icop-vs-powr
Free to use with attribution. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, ICOP against POWR, data as of Sep 30, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/icop-vs-powr Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
Other forms
- Plain
- ETFIQ, ICOP against POWR, data as of Sep 30, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/icop-vs-powr
- APA
- ETFIQ. (Sep 30, 2026). ICOP against POWR. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/icop-vs-powr
- Markdown
- [ICOP against POWR (ETFIQ, Sep 30, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/icop-vs-powr)