Do COPJ and POWR hold the same stocks?

By their latest filings, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight, which is mostly different names. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.

Which is more different from the S&P 500, COPJ or POWR?

COPJ has 0% of its weight in S&P 500 names and POWR has 80%, so COPJ differs more from the index.

Which is cheaper, COPJ or POWR?

COPJ charges 0.75% a year and POWR charges 0.39%, so POWR is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Share on X Download as PDF Open live

COPJ vs POWR: which is really different?

COPJ and POWR hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and COPJ returned +55.1% over the year. Sprott Junior Copper Miners ETF and iShares U.S. Power Infrastructure ETF.

0.0%

COPJ in the S&P 500

80.5%

POWR in the S&P 500

+55.1%

COPJ total return, 1 year

+2.8%

POWR total return, 1 year

COPJ · 1 year to Sep 30, 2026100% of its weight is outside the S&P 500

0% of COPJ's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 100% is outside the index

POWR · 1 year to Sep 30, 202620% of its weight is outside the S&P 500

81% of POWR's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 20% is outside the index

ETFIQ Off-Index Score · COPJ scores higherHow much of it is not the index it is sold as an alternative to?

COPJ 92

POWR 39.6

0.1, the lowest in this set92.0, the highest

A percentile among the 375 thematic ETFs with a holdings filing. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All thematic ETFs ranked by it → How it is computed →

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, COPJ and POWR hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Sep 30, 2026.

50%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold, largest shared weight first

Holding COPJ POWR

Only in COPJ

Faraday Copper Corp 5.08%

Trekor Metals Ltd 4.97%

Atalaya Mining Copper Sa 4.92%

Ero Copper Corp 4.77%

Osisko Metals Inc 4.50%

Firefly Metals Ltd 4.45%

Solaris Resources Inc 4.41%

Ivanhoe Electric Inc / Us 3.83%

Only in POWR

EATON PLC 6.56%

QUANTA SERVICES INC 6.50%

GE VERNOVA 6.34%

NEXTERA ENERGY 5.81%

EQT 4.45%

SOUTHERN 4.02%

NVENT ELECTRIC PLC 3.81%

DUKE ENERGY CORP 3.75%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed.

0% of the two portfolios are the same securities at the same weight.

Performance, window by window

	Total return		vs the S&P 500		vs the Nasdaq-100
Window	COPJ	POWR	COPJ	POWR	COPJ	POWR
3 months	+12.4%	−11.1%	+9.9 pts	−13.6 pts	+10.3 pts	−13.2 pts
6 months	+10.2%	−7.6%	−6.8 pts	−24.6 pts	−16.7 pts	−34.5 pts
1 year	+55.1%	+2.8%	+39.4 pts	−12.9 pts	+31.3 pts	−20.9 pts
3 years	+216.7%	+8.7%	+131.7 pts	−76.3 pts	+106.7 pts	−101.3 pts
Since launch COPJ Feb 2023 · POWR Feb 2012	+182.0%	+64.8%	+90.2 pts	−577.6 pts	+39.6 pts	−1207.1 pts

COPJ and POWR over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ. Open the live comparison on ETFIQ →

On the same fields

COPJ

Sprott Junior Copper Miners ETF · Holds 69 stocks in copper, 0% of its weight in S&P 500 companies

POWR

iShares U.S. Power Infrastructure ETF · Holds 82 stocks in electrification and the grid, 80% of its weight in S&P 500 companies

Issuer Sprott iShares

Theme Copper Electrification and the grid

In the S&P 500 0.0% 80.5%

Active share vs the S&P 500 100.0% 96.9%

In the Nasdaq-100 0.0% 9.9%

Holdings 69 82

Top ten, share of the fund 44.0% 48.3%

Expense ratio 0.75% 0.39%

Fee for the differing part 0.75% 0.40%

Total return, 1 year +55.1% +2.8%

vs the S&P 500 +39.4 pts −12.9 pts

vs the Nasdaq-100 +31.3 pts −20.9 pts

Below its high −14.8% −13.8%

Net assets $163m $426m

COPJ and POWR on the same fields, as of Sep 30, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

COPJ in plain words

By weight, 0% of COPJ's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 44% of the fund across 69 positions, as filed for Jun 30, 2026. Over the year to Sep 30, 2026 the fund returned +55.1% with distributions reinvested against +15.7% for the S&P 500, so a holder was ahead by 39.4 pts. It sits 14.8% below its all-time high of Jan 29, 2026.

POWR in plain words

By weight, 80% of POWR's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 97%. The top ten holdings are 48% of the fund across 82 positions, as published by its issuer for Sep 30, 2026. Over the year to Sep 30, 2026 the fund returned +2.8% with distributions reinvested against +15.7% for the S&P 500, so a holder was behind by 12.9 pts. It sits 13.8% below its all-time high of May 5, 2026.

Questions people ask

Do COPJ and POWR hold the same stocks?: By their latest filings, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight, which is mostly different names. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.
Which is more different from the S&P 500, COPJ or POWR?: COPJ has 0% of its weight in S&P 500 names and POWR has 80%, so COPJ differs more from the index.
Which is cheaper, COPJ or POWR?: COPJ charges 0.75% a year and POWR charges 0.39%, so POWR is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

COPJ vs POW COPJ vs TRFM COPJ vs VOLT COPJ vs ZAP POWR vs TRFM POWR vs VOLT POWR vs ZAP POWR vs COPP

COPJ on its own →POWR on its own →How every figure is computed →Standards and sources →

Where these figures came from

COPJ filings on SEC EDGAR ↗COPJ prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗Sprott page for COPJ ↗POWR filings on SEC EDGAR ↗POWR prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗iShares page for POWR ↗

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page

ETFIQ, COPJ against POWR, data as of Sep 30, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/copj-vs-powr

Open data

Free to use with attribution. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology.