Data as of Nov 4, 2026.
GTEK vs LFSC: Holdings Overlap & Returns
Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, GTEK returned +24.1% to LFSC's +43.6%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about GTEK and LFSC
Net assets: $209m on Nov 3, 2026 for Goldman Sachs Future Tech Leaders Equity ETF, and $126m on Aug 31, 2026 for F/m Emerald Life Sciences Innovation ETF.
33% of GTEK's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 67% is outside the index. Holdings as of Aug 31, 2026.
0% of LFSC's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 100% is outside the index. Holdings as of Aug 31, 2026.
Pair scorecard
LFSC costs 0.21 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 19.5 points.
Points (pts) are percentage points.
| Measure | GTEK | LFSC |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +24.1% | +43.6% |
| Drawdown | ||
| Below its all-time high | 20.5%, high on Jun 30, 2026 | 5.7%, high on Aug 19, 2026 |
| Against its benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | Broad innovation and megatrends | Broad innovation and megatrends |
| Its benchmark, total return, 1 year | +15.0% | +14.8% |
| Against its benchmark, 1 year | ahead by 9.1 pts | ahead by 28.8 pts |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.75% | 0.54% |
| Net assets, GTEK as of Nov 3, 2026 and LFSC as of Aug 31, 2026 | $209m | $126m |
| Active share vs the S&P 500 | 96% | 100% |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 0% | |
Risk and return
Nov 8, 2024 to Oct 30, 2026 · 103 weekly returnsEach against its own benchmark: GTEK against ACWI, Sep 24, 2021 to Oct 30, 2026; LFSC against IWV, Nov 8, 2024 to Oct 30, 2026.
From Nov 2024 to Oct 2026, LFSC returned more: +61.4% to +54.6%. LFSC swung slightly less: 26.7% to 27.9%. GTEK and LFSC fell about the same at their worst: −24.8% and −24.4%.
Full scorecard
19 measures, with how each is measured Open ↓
| Measure | GTEK | LFSC | Edge | How it is measured |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return | ||||
| Total return | +54.6% | +61.4% | LFSC | Price change plus distributions, reinvested. |
| Annualized | +24.6% | +27.3% | LFSC | Total return as a yearly rate. |
| Price return | +54.6% | +61.4% | LFSC | Price change alone, distributions left out. |
| Risk | ||||
| Volatility | 27.9% | 26.7% | LFSC (slight) | Spread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier. |
| Downside deviation | 19.0% | 17.5% | LFSC (slight) | Like volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate. |
| Max drawdown | −24.8% | −24.4% | Tie | Deepest fall from a high to the low after it. |
| Upside capture | 183.7% | 127.3% | Share of its benchmark's rise caught in the weeks it rose. | |
| Downside capture | 133.7% | 91.1% | Share of its benchmark's fall taken in the weeks it fell. Lower is better. | |
| Beta | 1.56 | 1.09 | Not an edge | How far it moves for each 1% its benchmark moves. |
| R squared | 0.74 | 0.36 | Not an edge | Share of its weekly moves its benchmark explains. |
| Risk-adjusted | ||||
| Sharpe | 0.78 | 0.89 | LFSC | Return above Treasury bills per unit of volatility. |
| Sortino | 1.15 | 1.36 | LFSC | Return above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation. |
| Treynor | 0.029 | 0.217 | Return above Treasury bills per unit of beta. | |
| Calmar | 0.99 | 1.12 | LFSC | Annualized return divided by the max drawdown. |
| Against the benchmark | ||||
| Benchmark | ACWI | IWV | The ETF each fund is measured against. | |
| Alpha | −6.6% a year | +13.4% a year | Not significant | Yearly return beyond what its beta to the benchmark predicts. |
| Alpha t-stat | −1.04 | 0.88 | Not an edge | How sure the alpha is. Below 2, it could be chance. |
| Alpha range | −19.0% to +5.8% | −16.9% to +43.8% | Includes zero | The 95% range for the yearly alpha. |
| Information ratio | −0.16 | 0.67 | Return against its benchmark per unit of tracking error. | |
| Tracking error | 16.6% | 21.4% | Not an edge | How far weekly returns stray from the benchmark, annualized. |
Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 103 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, GTEK and LFSC hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Aug 31, 2026.
half
0% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Window by window
| Total return | vs its benchmark | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Window | GTEK | LFSC | GTEK | LFSC |
| 3 months | −13.0% | −3.8% | −11.7 pts vs ACWI | −3.5 pts vs IWV |
| 6 months | −8.9% | +16.9% | −11.5 pts vs ACWI | +12.0 pts vs IWV |
| 1 year | +24.1% | +43.6% | +9.1 pts vs ACWI | +28.8 pts vs IWV |
| 3 years | +112.7% | – | +35.1 pts vs ACWI | – |
| Since launchNot the same days: GTEK Sep 2021 · LFSC Oct 2024 | +23.6% | +83.4% | −43.0 pts vs ACWI | +46.4 pts vs IWV |
– means no data for this window. Open this comparison in the app →
Side by side
As of Nov 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
0% of the two portfolios are the same securities at the same weight.
Client brief:
The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.
GTEK
By weight, 33% of GTEK's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 96%. The top ten holdings are 30% of the fund across 60 positions, as filed for Aug 31, 2026. Over the year to Nov 4, 2026 the fund returned +24.1% with distributions reinvested against +15.0% for its benchmark, the MSCI ACWI Index, so a holder was ahead by 9.1 pts. It sits 20.5% below its all-time high of Jun 30, 2026.
Over the year to Nov 4, 2026 the fund returned +43.6% with distributions reinvested against +14.8% for its benchmark, the Russell 3000 Total Return, so a holder was ahead by 28.8 pts.
By weight, 0% of LFSC's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 54% of the fund across 38 positions, as filed for Aug 31, 2026. It sits 5.7% below its all-time high of Aug 19, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Do GTEK and LFSC hold the same stocks?
- By their latest filings, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Every number is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, GTEK against LFSC, data as of Nov 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/gtek-vs-lfsc
ETFIQ. (Nov 4, 2026). GTEK against LFSC. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/gtek-vs-lfsc
[GTEK against LFSC (ETFIQ, Nov 4, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/gtek-vs-lfsc)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.