Data as of Nov 4, 2026.

vsOpen in the appCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Thematic ETFs

GBUG vs RING: Holdings Overlap & Returns

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, GBUG returned +29.6% to RING's +28.4%; 36% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about GBUG and RING

Net assets on Nov 4, 2026: $157m for Sprott Active Gold & Silver Miners ETF and $2.3bn for iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF.

At a glance
3.6%
GBUG in the S&P 500
17.6%
RING in the S&P 500
+29.6%
GBUG total return, 1 year
+28.4%
RING total return, 1 year
GBUG · 1 year to Nov 4, 2026 96% of its weight is outside the S&P 500
96% of its weight is outside the S&P 5004% of GBUG's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 96% is outside the index. Holdings as of Nov 4, 2026.4%96%inof its weight outside the S&P 500active share 100% · top ten 40% of the fund · 43 holdings as published by its issuer for Nov 4, 2026 · Nasdaq-100: 0% in96% of its weight is outside the S&P 5004% of GBUG's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 96% is outside the index. Holdings as of Nov 4, 2026.4%96%4% of its weight in S&P 500 companiesof its weight outside the S&P 500active share 100% · Nasdaq-100: 0% in

4% of GBUG's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 96% is outside the index. Holdings as of Nov 4, 2026.

RING · 1 year to Nov 4, 2026 82% of its weight is outside the S&P 500
82% of its weight is outside the S&P 50018% of RING's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 82% is outside the index. Holdings as of Nov 3, 2026.18%82%in the S&P 500of its weight outside the S&P 500active share 100% · top ten 68% of the fund · 41 holdings as published by its issuer for Nov 3, 2026 · Nasdaq-100: 0% in82% of its weight is outside the S&P 50018% of RING's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 82% is outside the index. Holdings as of Nov 3, 2026.18%82%inof its weight outside the S&P 500active share 100% · Nasdaq-100: 0% in

18% of RING's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 82% is outside the index. Holdings as of Nov 3, 2026.

Pair scorecard

RING costs 0.51 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 1.2 points; RING is 14.6 times larger.

Points (pts) are percentage points.

GBUG vs RING: Holdings Overlap & Returns
MeasureGBUGRING
Return
Total return, 1 year+29.6%+28.4%
Drawdown
Below its all-time high25.4%, high on Feb 27, 202625.1%, high on Feb 27, 2026
Against its benchmark
What it tracksGold minersGold miners
Its benchmark, total return, 1 year+15.0%
Against its benchmark, 1 yearahead by 13.4 pts
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.90%0.39%
Net assets$157m$2.3bn
Holdings
Holdings in common36%

Method

Risk and return

Feb 28, 2025 to Oct 30, 2026 · 87 weekly returns
GBUG RING
Return
Total return edge GBUG (slight) +112.6% +106.6%
Annualized edge GBUG (slight) +57.0% +54.3%
Price return edge GBUG (slight) +109.3% +102.9%
Risk
Volatility edge RING (slight) 50.9% 49.1%
Max drawdown edge GBUG (slight) −36.7% −38.3%
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe edge Tie 1.06 1.04
Sortino edge Tie 1.71 1.73
Calmar edge GBUG (slight) 1.55 1.42
Reading

From Feb 2025 to Oct 2026, GBUG returned slightly more: +112.6% to +106.6%. RING swung slightly less: 49.1% to 50.9%. GBUG fell slightly less at its worst: −36.7% to −38.3%.

Full scorecard

9 measures, with how each is measured
Open ↓
Risk and return: GBUG vs RING: Holdings Overlap & Returns
MeasureGBUGRINGEdgeHow it is measured
Return
Total return+112.6%+106.6%GBUG (slight)Price change plus distributions, reinvested.
Annualized+57.0%+54.3%GBUG (slight)Total return as a yearly rate.
Price return+109.3%+102.9%GBUG (slight)Price change alone, distributions left out.
Risk
Volatility50.9%49.1%RING (slight)Spread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier.
Downside deviation31.5%29.6%RING (slight)Like volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate.
Max drawdown−36.7%−38.3%GBUG (slight)Deepest fall from a high to the low after it.
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe1.061.04TieReturn above Treasury bills per unit of volatility.
Sortino1.711.73TieReturn above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation.
Calmar1.551.42GBUG (slight)Annualized return divided by the max drawdown.

Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 87 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.

What they share

36%

By the books each fund has filed, GBUG and RING hold 36% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Nov 3, 2026 and Nov 4, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

36% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first GBUG RING
Newmont Corp. 3.56% 17.65%
Agnico Eagle Mines Ltd. 3.26% 12.79%
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. 3.22% 7.33%
Coeur Mining Inc. 3.16% 2.84%
Equinox Gold Corp. 3.19% 2.47%
Anglogold Ashanti PLC 2.30% 4.40%
Barrick Mining Corp. 2.30% 8.72%
IAMGOLD Corp. 3.99% 2.11%
Alamos Gold Inc. 1.83% 2.36%
Eldorado Gold Corp. 3.47% 1.74%
SSR Mining Inc. 1.54% 1.48%
Genesis Minerals Ltd. 2.71% 1.41%
Only in one fund ↓
Only in GBUG
DPM Metals Inc. 5.11%
Discovery Mining Ltd. 4.80%
Northern Star Resources Ltd. 3.84%
Montage Gold Corp. 3.53%
Ramelius Resources Ltd. 3.14%
K92 Mining Inc. 2.90%
Skeena Resources Ltd. 2.83%
i-80 Gold Corp. 2.24%
Only in RING
GOLD FIELDS 4.51%
ENDEAVOUR MINING 2.01%
HARMONY GOLD MINING COMPANY LIMITE 1.92%
LUNDIN GOLD 1.59%
B2GOLD 1.45%
CENTERRA GOLD 1.38%
TOREX RESOURCES 1.27%
ZIJIN GOLD INTERNATIONAL LTD 1.18%
Check overlap with more funds →

Window by window

Window by window: GBUG vs RING: Holdings Overlap & Returns
Total returnvs its benchmark
WindowGBUGRINGGBUGRING
3 months−2.1%+2.4%not measured+3.7 pts vs ACWI
6 months−5.5%−7.2%not measured−9.8 pts vs ACWI
1 year+29.6%+28.4%not measured+13.4 pts vs ACWI
3 years–+233.8%–+156.2 pts vs ACWI
Since launchNot the same days: GBUG Feb 2025 · RING Feb 2012+117.5%+74.0%not measured−293.7 pts vs ACWI

– means no data for this window. Open this comparison in the app →

Side by side

GBUG Sprott Active Gold & Silver Miners ETF · Holds 43 stocks in gold miners, 4% of its weight in S&P 500 companies RING iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF · Holds 41 stocks in gold miners, 18% of its weight in S&P 500 companies
Theme Gold miners Gold miners
In the S&P 500 3.6% 17.6%
Active share vs the S&P 500 99.8% 99.8%
In the Nasdaq-100 0.0% 0.0%
Holdings 43 41
Top ten, share of the fund 39.6% 67.5%
Expense ratio 0.90% 0.39%
Fee for the differing part 0.90% 0.39%
Total return, 1 year +29.6% +28.4%
vs its benchmark not measured +13.4 pts vs ACWI
Below its high −25.4% −25.1%
Net assets $157m $2.3bn

As of Nov 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

36% of the two portfolios are the same securities at the same weight.

Client brief:

The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.

Your saved page · Privacy.

Alert

RING flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
GBUG

By weight, 4% of GBUG's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 40% of the fund across 43 positions, as published by its issuer for Nov 4, 2026. Over the year to Nov 4, 2026 the fund returned +29.6% with distributions reinvested. It sits 25.4% below its all-time high of Feb 27, 2026.

RING

By weight, 18% of RING's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 68% of the fund across 41 positions, as published by its issuer for Nov 3, 2026. Over the year to Nov 4, 2026 the fund returned +28.4% with distributions reinvested against +15.0% for its benchmark, the MSCI All Country World Index, so a holder was ahead by 13.4 pts. It sits 25.1% below its all-time high of Feb 27, 2026.

Questions people ask

Do GBUG and RING hold the same stocks?
By their latest filings, 36% of their books are the same securities at the same weight. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.
Which is more different from the S&P 500, GBUG or RING?
GBUG has 4% of its weight in S&P 500 names and RING has 18%, so GBUG differs more from the index.
Which is cheaper, GBUG or RING?
GBUG charges 0.90% a year and RING charges 0.39%, so RING is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, GBUG against RING, data as of Nov 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/gbug-vs-ring

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.