Data as of Nov 4, 2026.

vsOpen in the appCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Thematic ETFs

RING vs SGDM: Holdings Overlap & Returns

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, RING returned +28.4% to SGDM's +27.9%; 57% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about RING and SGDM

Net assets on Nov 4, 2026: $2.3bn for iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF and $617m for Sprott Gold Miners ETF.

At a glance
17.6%
RING in the S&P 500
8.0%
SGDM in the S&P 500
+28.4%
RING total return, 1 year
+27.9%
SGDM total return, 1 year
RING · 1 year to Nov 4, 2026 82% of its weight is outside the S&P 500
82% of its weight is outside the S&P 50018% of RING's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 82% is outside the index. Holdings as of Nov 3, 2026.18%82%in the S&P 500of its weight outside the S&P 500active share 100% · top ten 68% of the fund · 41 holdings as published by its issuer for Nov 3, 2026 · Nasdaq-100: 0% in82% of its weight is outside the S&P 50018% of RING's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 82% is outside the index. Holdings as of Nov 3, 2026.18%82%inof its weight outside the S&P 500active share 100% · Nasdaq-100: 0% in

18% of RING's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 82% is outside the index. Holdings as of Nov 3, 2026.

SGDM · 1 year to Nov 4, 2026 92% of its weight is outside the S&P 500
92% of its weight is outside the S&P 5008% of SGDM's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 92% is outside the index. Holdings as of Nov 4, 2026.8%92%inof its weight outside the S&P 500active share 100% · top ten 56% of the fund · 48 holdings as published by its issuer for Nov 4, 2026 · Nasdaq-100: 0% in92% of its weight is outside the S&P 5008% of SGDM's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 92% is outside the index. Holdings as of Nov 4, 2026.8%92%8% of its weight in S&P 500 companiesof its weight outside the S&P 500active share 100% · Nasdaq-100: 0% in

8% of SGDM's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 92% is outside the index. Holdings as of Nov 4, 2026.

Pair scorecard

RING costs 0.07 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 0.5 points; RING is 3.7 times larger.

Points (pts) are percentage points.

RING vs SGDM: Holdings Overlap & Returns
MeasureRINGSGDM
Return
Total return, 1 year+28.4%+27.9%
Drawdown
Below its all-time high25.1%, high on Feb 27, 202625.6%, high on Mar 2, 2026
Against its benchmark
What it tracksGold minersGold miners
Its benchmark, total return, 1 year+15.0%
Against its benchmark, 1 yearahead by 13.4 pts
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.39%0.46%
Net assets$2.3bn$617m
Holdings
Holdings in common57%

Method

Risk and return

Jul 25, 2014 to Oct 30, 2026 · 640 weekly returns
RING SGDM
Return
Total return edge RING +246.6% +182.9%
Annualized edge RING +10.6% +8.8%
Price return edge RING +197.1% +156.9%
Risk
Volatility edge Tie 38.2% 37.5%
Max drawdown edge Tie −53.3% −52.3%
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe edge RING 0.40 0.36
Sortino edge RING 0.60 0.53
Calmar edge RING 0.20 0.17
Reading

From Jul 2014 to Oct 2026, RING returned more: +246.6% to +182.9%. RING and SGDM swung about the same: 38.2% and 37.5%. RING and SGDM fell about the same at their worst: −53.3% and −52.3%.

Full scorecard

9 measures, with how each is measured
Open ↓
Risk and return: RING vs SGDM: Holdings Overlap & Returns
MeasureRINGSGDMEdgeHow it is measured
Return
Total return+246.6%+182.9%RINGPrice change plus distributions, reinvested.
Annualized+10.6%+8.8%RINGTotal return as a yearly rate.
Price return+197.1%+156.9%RINGPrice change alone, distributions left out.
Risk
Volatility38.2%37.5%TieSpread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier.
Downside deviation25.6%25.3%TieLike volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate.
Max drawdown−53.3%−52.3%TieDeepest fall from a high to the low after it.
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe0.400.36RINGReturn above Treasury bills per unit of volatility.
Sortino0.600.53RINGReturn above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation.
Calmar0.200.17RINGAnnualized return divided by the max drawdown.

Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 640 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.

What they share

57%

By the books each fund has filed, RING and SGDM hold 57% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Nov 3, 2026 and Nov 4, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

57% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first RING SGDM
AGNICO EAGLE MINES 12.79% 10.02%
NEWMONT 17.65% 8.00%
BARRICK MINING 8.72% 7.73%
WHEATON PRECIOUS METALS 7.33% 7.10%
KINROSS GOLD 3.74% 3.85%
PAN AMERICAN SILVER 3.02% 3.45%
COEUR MINING 2.84% 2.97%
IAMGOLD CORP 2.11% 2.97%
ENDEAVOUR MINING 2.01% 3.11%
ANGLOGOLD ASHANTI PLC 4.40% 1.67%
LUNDIN GOLD 1.59% 3.58%
CENTERRA GOLD 1.38% 2.73%
Only in one fund ↓
Only in RING
HARMONY GOLD MINING COMPANY LIMITE 1.92%
GENESIS MINERALS 1.41%
ZIJIN GOLD INTERNATIONAL LTD 1.18%
CHINA GOLD INTERNATIONAL RESOURCES 1.11%
WESTGOLD RESOURCES 0.87%
PAN AFRICAN RESOURCES PLC 0.85%
REGIS RESOURCES 0.79%
EMERALD RESOURCES 0.75%
Only in SGDM
Franco-Nevada Corp. 6.17%
Harmony Gold Mining Co. Ltd. 2.98%
OR Royalties Inc. 2.88%
DPM Metals Inc. 2.82%
Triple Flag Precious Metals Corp. 2.75%
Discovery Mining Ltd. 2.65%
K92 Mining Inc. 2.62%
Allied Gold Corp. 2.43%
Check overlap with more funds →

Window by window

Window by window: RING vs SGDM: Holdings Overlap & Returns
Total returnvs its benchmark
WindowRINGSGDMRINGSGDM
3 months+2.4%+2.7%+3.7 pts vs ACWInot measured
6 months−7.2%−5.9%−9.8 pts vs ACWInot measured
1 year+28.4%+27.9%+13.4 pts vs ACWInot measured
3 years+233.8%+198.6%+156.2 pts vs ACWInot measured
Since launchNot the same days: RING Feb 2012 · SGDM Jul 2014+74.0%+219.4%−293.7 pts vs ACWInot measured

Open this comparison in the app →

Side by side

RING iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF · Holds 41 stocks in gold miners, 18% of its weight in S&P 500 companies SGDM Sprott Gold Miners ETF · Holds 48 stocks in gold miners, 8% of its weight in S&P 500 companies
Theme Gold miners Gold miners
In the S&P 500 17.6% 8.0%
Active share vs the S&P 500 99.8% 99.8%
In the Nasdaq-100 0.0% 0.0%
Holdings 41 48
Top ten, share of the fund 67.5% 56.0%
Expense ratio 0.39% 0.46%
Fee for the differing part 0.39% 0.46%
Total return, 1 year +28.4% +27.9%
vs its benchmark +13.4 pts vs ACWI not measured
Below its high −25.1% −25.6%
Net assets $2.3bn $617m

As of Nov 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

57% of the two portfolios are the same securities at the same weight.

Client brief:

The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.

Your saved page · Privacy.

Alert

RING flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
RING

By weight, 18% of RING's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 68% of the fund across 41 positions, as published by its issuer for Nov 3, 2026. Over the year to Nov 4, 2026 the fund returned +28.4% with distributions reinvested against +15.0% for its benchmark, the MSCI All Country World Index, so a holder was ahead by 13.4 pts. It sits 25.1% below its all-time high of Feb 27, 2026.

SGDM

By weight, 8% of SGDM's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 56% of the fund across 48 positions, as published by its issuer for Nov 4, 2026. Over the year to Nov 4, 2026 the fund returned +27.9% with distributions reinvested. It sits 25.6% below its all-time high of Mar 2, 2026.

Questions people ask

Do RING and SGDM hold the same stocks?
By their latest filings, 57% of their books are the same securities at the same weight. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.
Which is more different from the S&P 500, RING or SGDM?
RING has 18% of its weight in S&P 500 names and SGDM has 8%, so RING differs more from the index.
Which is cheaper, RING or SGDM?
RING charges 0.39% a year and SGDM charges 0.46%, so RING is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, RING against SGDM, data as of Nov 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/ring-vs-sgdm

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.