Data as of Nov 4, 2026.
GBUG vs SGDM: Holdings Overlap & Returns
Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, GBUG returned +29.6% to SGDM's +27.9%; 38% of their weight is in the same names.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about GBUG and SGDMNet assets on Nov 4, 2026: $157m for Sprott Active Gold & Silver Miners ETF and $617m for Sprott Gold Miners ETF.
4% of GBUG's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 96% is outside the index. Holdings as of Nov 4, 2026.
8% of SGDM's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 92% is outside the index. Holdings as of Nov 4, 2026.
Pair scorecard
SGDM costs 0.44 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 1.7 points; SGDM is 3.9 times larger.
| Measure | GBUG | SGDM |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +29.6% | +27.9% |
| Drawdown | ||
| Below its all-time high | 25.4%, high on Feb 27, 2026 | 25.6%, high on Mar 2, 2026 |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | Gold miners | Gold miners |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.90% | 0.46% |
| Net assets | $157m | $617m |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 38% | |
Risk and return
Feb 28, 2025 to Oct 30, 2026 · 87 weekly returnsFrom Feb 2025 to Oct 2026, GBUG returned more: +112.6% to +100.7%. SGDM swung slightly less: 47.8% to 50.9%. GBUG fell slightly less at its worst: −36.7% to −37.7%.
Full scorecard
9 measures, with how each is measured Open ↓
| Measure | GBUG | SGDM | Edge | How it is measured |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return | ||||
| Total return | +112.6% | +100.7% | GBUG | Price change plus distributions, reinvested. |
| Annualized | +57.0% | +51.7% | GBUG (slight) | Total return as a yearly rate. |
| Price return | +109.3% | +98.7% | GBUG (slight) | Price change alone, distributions left out. |
| Risk | ||||
| Volatility | 50.9% | 47.8% | SGDM (slight) | Spread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier. |
| Downside deviation | 31.5% | 29.2% | SGDM (slight) | Like volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate. |
| Max drawdown | −36.7% | −37.7% | GBUG (slight) | Deepest fall from a high to the low after it. |
| Risk-adjusted | ||||
| Sharpe | 1.06 | 1.02 | GBUG (slight) | Return above Treasury bills per unit of volatility. |
| Sortino | 1.71 | 1.68 | GBUG (slight) | Return above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation. |
| Calmar | 1.55 | 1.37 | GBUG | Annualized return divided by the max drawdown. |
Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 87 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, GBUG and SGDM hold 38% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Nov 4, 2026.
half
38% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Window by window
| Total return | ||
|---|---|---|
| Window | GBUG | SGDM |
| 3 months | −2.1% | +2.7% |
| 6 months | −5.5% | −5.9% |
| 1 year | +29.6% | +27.9% |
| 3 years | – | +198.6% |
| Since launchNot the same days: GBUG Feb 2025 · SGDM Jul 2014 | +117.5% | +219.4% |
– means no data for this window. Open this comparison in the app →
Side by side
As of Nov 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
38% of the two portfolios are the same securities at the same weight.
Client brief:
The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.
GBUG
By weight, 4% of GBUG's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 40% of the fund across 43 positions, as published by its issuer for Nov 4, 2026. Over the year to Nov 4, 2026 the fund returned +29.6% with distributions reinvested. It sits 25.4% below its all-time high of Feb 27, 2026.
SGDM
By weight, 8% of SGDM's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 56% of the fund across 48 positions, as published by its issuer for Nov 4, 2026. Over the year to Nov 4, 2026 the fund returned +27.9% with distributions reinvested. It sits 25.6% below its all-time high of Mar 2, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Do GBUG and SGDM hold the same stocks?
- By their latest filings, 38% of their books are the same securities at the same weight. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Every number is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, GBUG against SGDM, data as of Nov 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/gbug-vs-sgdm
ETFIQ. (Nov 4, 2026). GBUG against SGDM. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/gbug-vs-sgdm
[GBUG against SGDM (ETFIQ, Nov 4, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/gbug-vs-sgdm)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.