Data as of .
FMED vs GTEK: which is really different?
FMED and GTEK hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and GTEK returned more over the year.
ETFIQ Off-Index Score: FMED scores higher
How much of it is not the index it is sold as an alternative to?
A percentile among the 379 thematic ETFs with a holdings filing. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All thematic ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed
0% of the two portfolios are the same securities at the same weight.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, FMED and GTEK hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Only in FMED | Only in GTEK |
|---|---|
| UCB SA 4.75% | MEDIATEK INC 5.20% |
| LIFESTANCE HEALTH GROUP INC 4.29% | DELTA ELECTRONICS INC 4.39% |
| DANAHER CORP 3.43% | MARVELL TECHNOLOGY INC 3.35% |
| 10X GENOMICS INC 3.12% | DELL TECHNOLOGIES INC 3.10% |
| INTUITIVE SURGICAL INC 2.93% | INFINEON TECHNOLOGIES AG 3.03% |
| COGENT BIOSCIENCES INC 2.86% | CHROMA ATE INC 2.71% |
| ALNYLAM PHARMACEUTICALS INC 2.80% | SK SQUARE CO LTD 2.65% |
| ARGENX SE 2.79% | ELITE MATERIAL COMPANY LTD 2.52% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated May 31, 2026.
Performance, window by window
| Window | Total return | vs the S&P 500 | vs the Nasdaq-100 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FMED | GTEK | FMED | GTEK | FMED | GTEK | |
| 3 months | +21.3% | −8.4% | +19.0 pts | −10.7 pts | +23.7 pts | −5.9 pts |
| 6 months | +32.3% | +38.8% | +14.3 pts | +20.8 pts | +8.0 pts | +14.6 pts |
| 1 year | +28.3% | +43.6% | +11.7 pts | +27.1 pts | +6.5 pts | +21.9 pts |
| 3 years | +39.6% | +135.6% | −38.8 pts | +57.2 pts | −58.5 pts | +37.5 pts |
| Since launch | +25.8% | +40.4% | −57.6 pts | −42.3 pts | −78.1 pts | −56.0 pts |
| FMED Fidelity Disruptive Medicine ETF Holds 68 stocks in broad innovation and megatrends, 25% of its weight in S&P 500 companies | GTEK Goldman Sachs Future Tech Leaders Equity ETF Holds 62 stocks in broad innovation and megatrends, 34% of its weight in S&P 500 companies | |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | Fidelity | Goldman Sachs |
| Theme | Broad innovation and megatrends | Broad innovation and megatrends |
| In the S&P 500 | 25.4% | 33.5% |
| Active share vs the S&P 500 | 97.1% | 96.4% |
| In the Nasdaq-100 | 8.7% | 18.4% |
| Holdings | 68 | 62 |
| Top ten, share of the fund | 31.5% | 31.8% |
| Expense ratio | 0.50% | 0.75% |
| Fee for the differing part | 0.51% | 0.78% |
| Total return, 1 year | +28.3% | +43.6% |
| vs the S&P 500 | +11.7 pts | +27.1 pts |
| vs the Nasdaq-100 | +6.5 pts | +21.9 pts |
| Below its high | −3.8% | −9.7% |
| Net assets | $52m | $233m |
FMED in plain words
By weight, 25% of FMED's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 97%. The top ten holdings are 32% of the fund across 68 positions, as filed for May 31, 2026. Over the year to Sep 18, 2026 the fund returned +28.3% with distributions reinvested against +16.6% for the S&P 500, so a holder was ahead by 11.7 pts.
GTEK in plain words
By weight, 34% of GTEK's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 96%. The top ten holdings are 32% of the fund across 62 positions, as filed for May 31, 2026. Over the year to Sep 18, 2026 the fund returned +43.6% with distributions reinvested against +16.6% for the S&P 500, so a holder was ahead by 27.1 pts. It sits 9.7% below its all-time high of Jun 30, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Do FMED and GTEK hold the same stocks?
- By their latest filings, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight, which is mostly different names. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.
- Which is more different from the S&P 500, FMED or GTEK?
- FMED has 25% of its weight in S&P 500 names and GTEK has 34%, so FMED differs more from the index.
- Which is cheaper, FMED or GTEK?
- FMED charges 0.50% a year and GTEK charges 0.75%, so FMED is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, FMED against GTEK, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/fmed-vs-gtek Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.