Data as of Nov 4, 2026.
FDFF vs TMAT: Holdings Overlap & Returns
Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, FDFF returned +9.3% to TMAT's −3.1%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about FDFF and TMATNet assets: $43m on Sep 30, 2026 for Fidelity Disruptive Finance ETF, and $237m on Jul 31, 2026 for Main Thematic Innovation ETF.
43% of FDFF's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 57% is outside the index. Holdings as of Aug 31, 2026.
50% of TMAT's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 50% is outside the index. Holdings as of Jul 31, 2026.
Pair scorecard
FDFF costs 0.29 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 12.4 points.
Points (pts) are percentage points.
| Measure | FDFF | TMAT |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +9.3% | −3.1% |
| Drawdown | ||
| Below its all-time high | 15.9%, high on Jun 30, 2026 | |
| Against its benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | Broad innovation and megatrends | Broad innovation and megatrends |
| Its benchmark, total return, 1 year | +15.0% | |
| Against its benchmark, 1 year | behind by 18.1 pts | |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.50% | 0.79% |
| Net assets, FDFF as of Sep 30, 2026 and TMAT as of Jul 31, 2026 | $43m | $237m |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 0% | |
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, FDFF and TMAT hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Aug 31, 2026.
half
0% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Window by window
| Total return | vs its benchmark | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Window | FDFF | TMAT | FDFF | TMAT |
| 3 months | +2.4% | −9.4% | not measured | −8.1 pts vs ACWI |
| 6 months | +11.1% | −4.9% | not measured | −7.5 pts vs ACWI |
| 1 year | +9.3% | −3.1% | not measured | −18.1 pts vs ACWI |
| 3 years | +53.9% | +92.3% | not measured | +14.7 pts vs ACWI |
| Since launchNot the same days: FDFF Jun 2023 · TMAT Jan 2021 | +52.8% | +7.5% | not measured | −85.1 pts vs ACWI |
Side by side
As of Nov 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
0% of the two portfolios are the same securities at the same weight.
FDFF
By weight, 43% of FDFF's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 98%. The top ten holdings are 46% of the fund across 46 positions, as filed for Aug 31, 2026. Over the year to Nov 4, 2026 the fund returned +9.3% with distributions reinvested.
TMAT
By weight, 50% of TMAT's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 92%. The top ten holdings are 27% of the fund across 87 positions, as filed for Jul 31, 2026. Over the year to Nov 4, 2026 the fund returned −3.1% with distributions reinvested against +15.0% for its benchmark, the MSCI ACWI Index Net, so a holder was behind by 18.1 pts. It sits 15.9% below its all-time high of Jun 30, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Do FDFF and TMAT hold the same stocks?
- By their latest filings, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Every number is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, FDFF against TMAT, data as of Nov 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/fdff-vs-tmat
ETFIQ. (Nov 4, 2026). FDFF against TMAT. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/fdff-vs-tmat
[FDFF against TMAT (ETFIQ, Nov 4, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/fdff-vs-tmat)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.