Data as of .
FDFF vs QQQJ: which is really different?
FDFF and QQQJ hold 1% of their weight in the same names, and QQQJ returned more over the year.
ETFIQ Off-Index Score: QQQJ scores higher
How much of it is not the index it is sold as an alternative to?
A percentile among the 379 thematic ETFs with a holdings filing. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All thematic ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed
1% of the two portfolios are the same securities at the same weight.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, FDFF and QQQJ hold 1% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | FDFF | QQQJ |
|---|---|---|
| AFFIRM HOLDINGS INC | 1.79% | 1.06% |
| Only in FDFF | Only in QQQJ |
|---|---|
| BLACKROCK INC 6.00% | Natera Inc 2.67% |
| DBS GROUP HOLDINGS LTD 5.82% | eBay Inc 2.51% |
| CAPITAL ONE FINANCIAL CORP 5.43% | Revolution Medicines Inc 2.05% |
| BANKINTER SA 4.91% | Flex Ltd 2.01% |
| FINECOBANK SPA 4.52% | NetApp Inc 1.97% |
| APOLLO GLOBAL MANAGEMENT, INC 4.47% | Illumina Inc 1.83% |
| VISA INC 4.33% | United Airlines Holdings Inc 1.78% |
| BLOCK INC 4.17% | Elbit Systems Ltd 1.75% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated May 31, 2026 and Sep 19, 2026.
Performance, window by window
| Window | Total return | vs the S&P 500 | vs the Nasdaq-100 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FDFF | QQQJ | FDFF | QQQJ | FDFF | QQQJ | |
| 3 months | +8.2% | −0.9% | +5.9 pts | −3.1 pts | +10.6 pts | +1.6 pts |
| 6 months | +16.3% | +22.6% | −1.8 pts | +4.6 pts | −8.0 pts | −1.6 pts |
| 1 year | −4.9% | +22.4% | −21.5 pts | +5.8 pts | −26.7 pts | +0.7 pts |
| 3 years | +41.4% | +80.4% | −37.0 pts | +2.0 pts | −56.7 pts | −17.8 pts |
| Since launch | +45.6% | +72.2% | −37.8 pts | −63.7 pts | −58.3 pts | −81.2 pts |
| FDFF Fidelity Disruptive Finance ETF Holds 45 stocks in broad innovation and megatrends, 45% of its weight in S&P 500 companies | QQQJ Invesco NASDAQ Next Gen 100 ETF Holds 108 stocks in broad innovation and megatrends, 46% of its weight in S&P 500 companies | |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | Fidelity | Invesco |
| Theme | Broad innovation and megatrends | Broad innovation and megatrends |
| In the S&P 500 | 45.1% | 46.2% |
| Active share vs the S&P 500 | 97.4% | 98.6% |
| In the Nasdaq-100 | 2.4% | 1.4% |
| Holdings | 45 | 108 |
| Top ten, share of the fund | 47.5% | 19.9% |
| Expense ratio | 0.50% | 0.15% |
| Fee for the differing part | 0.51% | 0.15% |
| Total return, 1 year | −4.9% | +22.4% |
| vs the S&P 500 | −21.5 pts | +5.8 pts |
| vs the Nasdaq-100 | −26.7 pts | +0.7 pts |
| Below its high | −8.3% | −5.5% |
| Net assets | $47m | $1.2bn |
FDFF in plain words
By weight, 45% of FDFF's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 97%. The top ten holdings are 48% of the fund across 45 positions, as filed for May 31, 2026. Over the year to Sep 18, 2026 the fund returned −4.9% with distributions reinvested against +16.6% for the S&P 500, so a holder was behind by 21.5 pts. It sits 8.3% below its all-time high of Jan 30, 2025.
QQQJ in plain words
By weight, 46% of QQQJ's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 99%. The top ten holdings are 20% of the fund across 108 positions, as published by its issuer for Sep 19, 2026. Over the year to Sep 18, 2026 the fund returned +22.4% with distributions reinvested against +16.6% for the S&P 500, so a holder was ahead by 5.8 pts. It sits 5.5% below its all-time high of Aug 13, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Do FDFF and QQQJ hold the same stocks?
- By their latest filings, 1% of their books are the same securities at the same weight, which is mostly different names. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.
- Which is more different from the S&P 500, FDFF or QQQJ?
- FDFF has 45% of its weight in S&P 500 names and QQQJ has 46%, so QQQJ differs more from the index.
- Which is cheaper, FDFF or QQQJ?
- FDFF charges 0.50% a year and QQQJ charges 0.15%, so QQQJ is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, FDFF against QQQJ, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/fdff-vs-qqqj Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.