Data as of .
ABOT vs FDFF: which is really different?
ABOT and FDFF hold 2% of their weight in the same names, and ABOT returned more over the year.
ETFIQ Off-Index Score: FDFF scores higher
How much of it is not the index it is sold as an alternative to?
A percentile among the 379 thematic ETFs with a holdings filing. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All thematic ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed
2% of the two portfolios are the same securities at the same weight.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, ABOT and FDFF hold 2% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | ABOT | FDFF |
|---|---|---|
| Toast Inc | 1.57% | 3.59% |
| Only in ABOT | Only in FDFF |
|---|---|
| NVIDIA Corp 6.32% | BLACKROCK INC 6.00% |
| Apple Inc 5.46% | DBS GROUP HOLDINGS LTD 5.82% |
| Broadcom Inc 4.61% | CAPITAL ONE FINANCIAL CORP 5.43% |
| Bristol-Myers Squibb Co 3.21% | BANKINTER SA 4.91% |
| QUALCOMM Inc 3.18% | FINECOBANK SPA 4.52% |
| Airbnb Inc 3.06% | APOLLO GLOBAL MANAGEMENT, INC 4.47% |
| VeriSign Inc 2.88% | VISA INC 4.33% |
| AbbVie Inc 2.85% | BLOCK INC 4.17% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.
Performance, window by window
| Window | Total return | vs the S&P 500 | vs the Nasdaq-100 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ABOT | FDFF | ABOT | FDFF | ABOT | FDFF | |
| 3 months | +15.7% | +8.2% | +13.4 pts | +5.9 pts | +18.2 pts | +10.6 pts |
| 6 months | +30.5% | +16.3% | +12.4 pts | −1.8 pts | +6.2 pts | −8.0 pts |
| 1 year | +7.7% | −4.9% | −8.9 pts | −21.5 pts | −14.1 pts | −26.7 pts |
| 3 years | +76.5% | +41.4% | −1.9 pts | −37.0 pts | −21.6 pts | −56.7 pts |
| Since launch | +88.3% | +45.6% | −34.9 pts | −37.8 pts | −53.9 pts | −58.3 pts |
| ABOT Abacus FCF Innovation Leaders ETF Holds 54 stocks in broad innovation and megatrends, 70% of its weight in S&P 500 companies | FDFF Fidelity Disruptive Finance ETF Holds 45 stocks in broad innovation and megatrends, 45% of its weight in S&P 500 companies | |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | Abacus FCF | Fidelity |
| Theme | Broad innovation and megatrends | Broad innovation and megatrends |
| In the S&P 500 | 70.2% | 45.1% |
| Active share vs the S&P 500 | 80.9% | 97.4% |
| In the Nasdaq-100 | 46.5% | 2.4% |
| Holdings | 54 | 45 |
| Top ten, share of the fund | 36.5% | 47.5% |
| Expense ratio | 0.39% | 0.50% |
| Fee for the differing part | 0.48% | 0.51% |
| Total return, 1 year | +7.7% | −4.9% |
| vs the S&P 500 | −8.9 pts | −21.5 pts |
| vs the Nasdaq-100 | −14.1 pts | −26.7 pts |
| Below its high | −2.4% | −8.3% |
| Net assets | $4m | $47m |
ABOT in plain words
By weight, 70% of ABOT's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 81%. The top ten holdings are 36% of the fund across 54 positions, as filed for Apr 30, 2026. Over the year to Sep 18, 2026 the fund returned +7.7% with distributions reinvested against +16.6% for the S&P 500, so a holder was behind by 8.9 pts.
FDFF in plain words
By weight, 45% of FDFF's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 97%. The top ten holdings are 48% of the fund across 45 positions, as filed for May 31, 2026. Over the year to Sep 18, 2026 the fund returned −4.9% with distributions reinvested against +16.6% for the S&P 500, so a holder was behind by 21.5 pts. It sits 8.3% below its all-time high of Jan 30, 2025.
Questions people ask
- Do ABOT and FDFF hold the same stocks?
- By their latest filings, 2% of their books are the same securities at the same weight, which is mostly different names. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.
- Which is more different from the S&P 500, ABOT or FDFF?
- ABOT has 70% of its weight in S&P 500 names and FDFF has 45%, so FDFF differs more from the index.
- Which is cheaper, ABOT or FDFF?
- ABOT charges 0.39% a year and FDFF charges 0.50%, so ABOT is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, ABOT against FDFF, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/abot-vs-fdff Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.