Data as of Nov 4, 2026.
FDCF vs ILDR: Holdings Overlap & Returns
Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, FDCF returned +1.2% to ILDR's +6.6%; 23% of their weight is in the same names.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about FDCF and ILDR
Net assets: $103m on Sep 30, 2026 for Fidelity Disruptive Communications ETF, and $334m on Nov 3, 2026 for First Trust Innovation Leaders ETF.
51% of FDCF's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 49% is outside the index. Holdings as of Aug 31, 2026.
66% of ILDR's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 35% is outside the index. Holdings as of Nov 3, 2026.
Pair scorecard
FDCF costs 0.25 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 5.4 points.
Points (pts) are percentage points.
| Measure | FDCF | ILDR |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +1.2% | +6.6% |
| Drawdown | ||
| Below its all-time high | 7.2%, high on Oct 6, 2026 | 12.5%, high on Oct 6, 2026 |
| Against its benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | Broad innovation and megatrends | Broad innovation and megatrends |
| Its benchmark, total return, 1 year | +14.8% | |
| Against its benchmark, 1 year | behind by 8.2 pts | |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.50% | 0.75% |
| Net assets, FDCF as of Sep 30, 2026 and ILDR as of Nov 3, 2026 | $103m | $334m |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 23% | |
How different its holdings are from the S&P 500, ranked against 114 thematic ETFs with at least half their money in S&P 500 companies. 100 is best. How it is computed
Weight not shared with the S&P 500 only; it says nothing about returns, fees or whether the theme pays off. All thematic ETFs ranked by it →
Risk and return
Jun 23, 2023 to Oct 30, 2026 · 175 weekly returnsFrom Jun 2023 to Oct 2026, ILDR returned more: +102.3% to +88.7%. FDCF swung slightly less: 20.3% to 22.4%. FDCF fell less at its worst: −20.5% to −25.8%.
Full scorecard
9 measures, with how each is measured Open ↓
| Measure | FDCF | ILDR | Edge | How it is measured |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return | ||||
| Total return | +88.7% | +102.3% | ILDR | Price change plus distributions, reinvested. |
| Annualized | +20.8% | +23.3% | ILDR | Total return as a yearly rate. |
| Price return | +87.4% | +102.3% | ILDR | Price change alone, distributions left out. |
| Risk | ||||
| Volatility | 20.3% | 22.4% | FDCF (slight) | Spread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier. |
| Downside deviation | 13.2% | 14.7% | FDCF (slight) | Like volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate. |
| Max drawdown | −20.5% | −25.8% | FDCF | Deepest fall from a high to the low after it. |
| Risk-adjusted | ||||
| Sharpe | 0.81 | 0.84 | ILDR (slight) | Return above Treasury bills per unit of volatility. |
| Sortino | 1.24 | 1.29 | ILDR (slight) | Return above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation. |
| Calmar | 1.01 | 0.90 | FDCF | Annualized return divided by the max drawdown. |
Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 175 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, FDCF and ILDR hold 23% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Aug 31, 2026 and Nov 3, 2026.
half
23% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Window by window
| Total return | vs its benchmark | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Window | FDCF | ILDR | FDCF | ILDR |
| 3 months | −1.9% | −7.4% | not measured | −7.1 pts vs IWV |
| 6 months | −1.2% | −1.8% | not measured | −6.7 pts vs IWV |
| 1 year | +1.2% | +6.6% | not measured | −8.2 pts vs IWV |
| 3 years | +91.2% | +107.0% | not measured | +26.0 pts vs IWV |
| Since launchNot the same days: FDCF Jun 2023 · ILDR May 2021 | +94.2% | +75.9% | not measured | −10.3 pts vs IWV |
Side by side
As of Nov 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
23% of the two portfolios are the same securities at the same weight.
Client brief:
The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.
FDCF
By weight, 51% of FDCF's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 80%. The top ten holdings are 54% of the fund across 37 positions, as filed for Aug 31, 2026. Over the year to Nov 4, 2026 the fund returned +1.2% with distributions reinvested. It sits 7.2% below its all-time high of Oct 6, 2026.
Over the year to Nov 4, 2026 the fund returned +6.6% with distributions reinvested against +14.8% for its benchmark, the Russell 3000 Index, so a holder was behind by 8.2 pts.
By weight, 66% of ILDR's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 67%. The top ten holdings are 44% of the fund across 81 positions, as published by its issuer for Nov 3, 2026. It sits 12.5% below its all-time high of Oct 6, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Do FDCF and ILDR hold the same stocks?
- By their latest filings, 23% of their books are the same securities at the same weight. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
It is a place in a set, not a rating or a recommendation.
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Every number is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, FDCF against ILDR, data as of Nov 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/fdcf-vs-ildr
ETFIQ. (Nov 4, 2026). FDCF against ILDR. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/fdcf-vs-ildr
[FDCF against ILDR (ETFIQ, Nov 4, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/fdcf-vs-ildr)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.