Data as of .
FDCF vs TMAT: which is really different?
FDCF and TMAT hold 2% of their weight in the same names, and TMAT returned more over the year.
ETFIQ Off-Index Score: TMAT scores higher
How much of it is not the index it is sold as an alternative to?
A percentile among the 379 thematic ETFs with a holdings filing. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All thematic ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed
2% of the two portfolios are the same securities at the same weight.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, FDCF and TMAT hold 2% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | FDCF | TMAT |
|---|---|---|
| CLOUDFLARE INC | 1.99% | 1.40% |
| TAIWAN SEMICONDUCTOR MFG CO LTD | 10.85% | 1.05% |
| Only in FDCF | Only in TMAT |
|---|---|
| ALPHABET INC 8.86% | VICOR CORP 2.98% |
| META PLATFORMS INC 6.18% | MICRON TECHNOLOGY INC 2.81% |
| NVIDIA CORP 5.61% | LUMENTUM HOLDINGS INC 2.75% |
| ARISTA NETWORKS INC 5.58% | CIENA CORP 2.61% |
| AMAZON.COM INC 5.42% | PALO ALTO NETWORKS INC 2.55% |
| WARNER BROS DISCOVERY INC 3.88% | CLEAR SECURE INC 2.48% |
| ROKU INC 3.87% | KEYSIGHT TECHNOLOGIES INC 2.26% |
| QUEBECOR INC 3.10% | MODINE MANUFACTURING COMPANY 1.94% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.
Performance, window by window
| Window | Total return | vs the S&P 500 | vs the Nasdaq-100 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FDCF | TMAT | FDCF | TMAT | FDCF | TMAT | |
| 3 months | +1.6% | −5.8% | −0.7 pts | −8.1 pts | +4.1 pts | −3.3 pts |
| 6 months | +17.5% | +21.2% | −0.5 pts | +3.1 pts | −6.7 pts | −3.1 pts |
| 1 year | +1.5% | +3.5% | −15.1 pts | −13.0 pts | −20.3 pts | −18.2 pts |
| 3 years | +100.6% | +105.6% | +22.2 pts | +27.2 pts | +2.5 pts | +7.4 pts |
| Since launch | +101.0% | +16.5% | +17.6 pts | −105.8 pts | −2.9 pts | −120.4 pts |
| FDCF Fidelity Disruptive Communications ETF Holds 38 stocks in broad innovation and megatrends, 56% of its weight in S&P 500 companies | TMAT Main Thematic Innovation ETF Holds 88 stocks in broad innovation and megatrends, 46% of its weight in S&P 500 companies | |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | Fidelity | Main |
| Theme | Broad innovation and megatrends | Broad innovation and megatrends |
| In the S&P 500 | 56.1% | 46.4% |
| Active share vs the S&P 500 | 79.8% | 91.5% |
| In the Nasdaq-100 | 45.7% | 22.9% |
| Holdings | 38 | 88 |
| Top ten, share of the fund | 56.1% | 24.2% |
| Expense ratio | 0.50% | 0.82% |
| Fee for the differing part | 0.63% | 0.90% |
| Total return, 1 year | +1.5% | +3.5% |
| vs the S&P 500 | −15.1 pts | −13.0 pts |
| vs the Nasdaq-100 | −20.3 pts | −18.2 pts |
| Below its high | −2.0% | −9.0% |
| Net assets | $101m | $211m |
FDCF in plain words
By weight, 56% of FDCF's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 80%. The top ten holdings are 56% of the fund across 38 positions, as filed for May 31, 2026. Over the year to Sep 18, 2026 the fund returned +1.5% with distributions reinvested against +16.6% for the S&P 500, so a holder was behind by 15.1 pts.
TMAT in plain words
By weight, 46% of TMAT's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 92%. The top ten holdings are 24% of the fund across 88 positions, as filed for Apr 30, 2026. Over the year to Sep 18, 2026 the fund returned +3.5% with distributions reinvested against +16.6% for the S&P 500, so a holder was behind by 13.0 pts. It sits 9.0% below its all-time high of Jun 30, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Do FDCF and TMAT hold the same stocks?
- By their latest filings, 2% of their books are the same securities at the same weight, which is mostly different names. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.
- Which is more different from the S&P 500, FDCF or TMAT?
- FDCF has 56% of its weight in S&P 500 names and TMAT has 46%, so TMAT differs more from the index.
- Which is cheaper, FDCF or TMAT?
- FDCF charges 0.50% a year and TMAT charges 0.82%, so FDCF is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, FDCF against TMAT, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/fdcf-vs-tmat Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.