Data as of .
EMQQ vs FDN: which is really different?
EMQQ and FDN hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and FDN returned more over the year.
ETFIQ Off-Index Score: EMQQ scores higher
How much of it is not the index it is sold as an alternative to?
A percentile among the 379 thematic ETFs with a holdings filing. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All thematic ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed
0% of the two portfolios are the same securities at the same weight.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, EMQQ and FDN hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Only in EMQQ | Only in FDN |
|---|---|
| MercadoLibre, Inc. 8.40% | Meta Platforms, Inc. (Class A) 10.18% |
| RELIANCE INDUSTRIES LIMITED 8.15% | Amazon.com, Inc. 10.05% |
| Alibaba Group Holding Limited 6.79% | Cisco Systems, Inc. 8.71% |
| PDD Holdings Inc. 6.23% | Netflix, Inc. 5.94% |
| SEA LIMITED 6.08% | Alphabet Inc. (Class A) 5.86% |
| Tencent Holdings Limited 5.95% | Alphabet Inc. (Class C) 4.67% |
| Nu Holdings Ltd. 5.66% | Arista Networks, Inc. 4.65% |
| MEITUAN 4.06% | Salesforce, Inc. 4.38% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated May 31, 2026 and Sep 18, 2026.
Performance, window by window
| Window | Total return | vs the S&P 500 | vs the Nasdaq-100 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EMQQ | FDN | EMQQ | FDN | EMQQ | FDN | |
| 3 months | −0.1% | +8.4% | −2.4 pts | +6.2 pts | +2.4 pts | +10.9 pts |
| 6 months | −2.4% | +21.2% | −20.5 pts | +3.2 pts | −26.7 pts | −3.0 pts |
| 1 year | −30.5% | +0.8% | −47.1 pts | −15.8 pts | −52.3 pts | −21.0 pts |
| 3 years | +11.2% | +74.0% | −67.2 pts | −4.4 pts | −87.0 pts | −24.1 pts |
| Since launch | +32.8% | +1028.4% | −322.8 pts | +224.9 pts | −634.5 pts | −661.8 pts |
| EMQQ EMQQ The Emerging Markets Internet ETF Holds 58 stocks in internet and e-commerce, 0% of its weight in S&P 500 companies | FDN First Trust Dow Jones Internet Index Fund Holds 42 stocks in internet and e-commerce, 83% of its weight in S&P 500 companies | |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | EMQQ Global | First Trust |
| Theme | Internet and e-commerce | Internet and e-commerce |
| In the S&P 500 | 0.0% | 82.8% |
| Active share vs the S&P 500 | 100.0% | 85.5% |
| In the Nasdaq-100 | 14.6% | 60.9% |
| Holdings | 58 | 42 |
| Top ten, share of the fund | 58.1% | 62.8% |
| Expense ratio | 0.86% | 0.49% |
| Fee for the differing part | 0.86% | 0.57% |
| Total return, 1 year | −30.5% | +0.8% |
| vs the S&P 500 | −47.1 pts | −15.8 pts |
| vs the Nasdaq-100 | −52.3 pts | −21.0 pts |
| Below its high | −58.8% | −2.4% |
| Net assets | $264m | $5.3bn |
EMQQ in plain words
By weight, 0% of EMQQ's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 58% of the fund across 58 positions, as filed for May 31, 2026. Over the year to Sep 18, 2026 the fund returned −30.5% with distributions reinvested against +16.6% for the S&P 500, so a holder was behind by 47.1 pts. It sits 58.8% below its all-time high of Feb 17, 2021.
FDN in plain words
By weight, 83% of FDN's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 86%. The top ten holdings are 63% of the fund across 42 positions, as published by its issuer for Sep 18, 2026. Over the year to Sep 18, 2026 the fund returned +0.8% with distributions reinvested against +16.6% for the S&P 500, so a holder was behind by 15.8 pts.
Questions people ask
- Do EMQQ and FDN hold the same stocks?
- By their latest filings, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight, which is mostly different names. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.
- Which is more different from the S&P 500, EMQQ or FDN?
- EMQQ has 0% of its weight in S&P 500 names and FDN has 83%, so EMQQ differs more from the index.
- Which is cheaper, EMQQ or FDN?
- EMQQ charges 0.86% a year and FDN charges 0.49%, so FDN is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, EMQQ against FDN, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/emqq-vs-fdn Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.