Data as of .
EART vs REMX: which is really different?
EART and REMX hold 6% of their weight in the same names, and EART returned more over the year.
ETFIQ Off-Index Score: REMX scores higher
How much of it is not the index it is sold as an alternative to?
A percentile among the 379 thematic ETFs with a holdings filing. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All thematic ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed
6% of the two portfolios are the same securities at the same weight.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, EART and REMX hold 6% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | EART | REMX |
|---|---|---|
| ALBEMARLE CORP | 2.79% | 7.78% |
| MP MATERIALS CORP | 2.37% | 6.25% |
| LITHIUM AMERICAS CORP | 0.32% | 1.91% |
| Only in EART | Only in REMX |
|---|---|
| FREEPORT-MCMORAN INC 5.40% | Sociedad Quimica Y Minera De Chile Sa 7.93% |
| ANGLO AMERICAN PLC 5.36% | Pilbara Minerals Ltd 6.28% |
| SOUTHERN COPPER CORP 5.02% | Lynas Rare Earths Ltd 5.96% |
| GRUPO MEXICO SAB DE CV-SER B 4.87% | China Northern Rare Earth Group High-Te 5.76% |
| RIO TINTO PLC 4.53% | Xiamen Tungsten Co Ltd 4.95% |
| ANTOFAGASTA PLC 4.42% | Jinduicheng Molybdenum Co Ltd 4.74% |
| VALTERRA PLATINUM LIMITED 4.15% | Lianyou Metals Co Ltd 4.68% |
| SUMITOMO METAL MINING CO LTD 4.07% | Almonty Industries Inc 4.17% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Sep 18, 2026.
Performance, window by window
| Window | Total return | vs the S&P 500 | vs the Nasdaq-100 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EART | REMX | EART | REMX | EART | REMX | |
| 3 months | −8.0% | −27.7% | −10.3 pts | −30.0 pts | −5.5 pts | −25.2 pts |
| 6 months | +7.6% | −12.7% | −10.5 pts | −30.7 pts | −16.7 pts | −36.9 pts |
| 1 year | +34.5% | +14.7% | +17.9 pts | −1.9 pts | +12.7 pts | −7.1 pts |
| 3 years | +82.2% | +3.6% | +3.8 pts | −74.8 pts | −16.0 pts | −94.6 pts |
| Since launch | +30.0% | −53.7% | −57.3 pts | −806.3 pts | −85.2 pts | −1534.3 pts |
| EART Global X Rare Earth & Critical Materials ETF Holds 56 stocks in rare earth and critical materials, 8% of its weight in S&P 500 companies | REMX VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF Holds 32 stocks in rare earth and critical materials, 8% of its weight in S&P 500 companies | |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | Global X | VanEck |
| Theme | Rare earth and critical materials | Rare earth and critical materials |
| In the S&P 500 | 8.2% | 7.6% |
| Active share vs the S&P 500 | 99.8% | 100.0% |
| In the Nasdaq-100 | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Holdings | 56 | 32 |
| Top ten, share of the fund | 45.4% | 61.8% |
| Expense ratio | 0.59% | 0.53% |
| Fee for the differing part | 0.59% | 0.53% |
| Total return, 1 year | +34.5% | +14.7% |
| vs the S&P 500 | +17.9 pts | −1.9 pts |
| vs the Nasdaq-100 | +12.7 pts | −7.1 pts |
| Below its high | −20.4% | −68.3% |
| Net assets | $42m | $2.0bn |
EART in plain words
By weight, 8% of EART's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 45% of the fund across 56 positions, as published by its issuer for Sep 18, 2026. Over the year to Sep 18, 2026 the fund returned +34.5% with distributions reinvested against +16.6% for the S&P 500, so a holder was ahead by 17.9 pts. It sits 20.4% below its all-time high of Feb 27, 2026.
REMX in plain words
By weight, 8% of REMX's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 62% of the fund across 32 positions, as published by its issuer for Sep 18, 2026. Over the year to Sep 18, 2026 the fund returned +14.7% with distributions reinvested against +16.6% for the S&P 500, so a holder was behind by 1.9 pts. It sits 68.3% below its all-time high of Apr 11, 2011.
Questions people ask
- Do EART and REMX hold the same stocks?
- By their latest filings, 6% of their books are the same securities at the same weight, which is mostly different names. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.
- Which is more different from the S&P 500, EART or REMX?
- EART has 8% of its weight in S&P 500 names and REMX has 8%, so REMX differs more from the index.
- Which is cheaper, EART or REMX?
- EART charges 0.59% a year and REMX charges 0.53%, so REMX is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, EART against REMX, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/eart-vs-remx Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.