Do EART and SETM hold the same stocks?

By their latest filings, 25% of their books are the same securities at the same weight. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.

Which is more different from the S&P 500, EART or SETM?

EART has 8% of its weight in S&P 500 names and SETM has 9%, so EART differs more from the index.

Which is cheaper, EART or SETM?

EART charges 0.59% a year and SETM charges 0.65%, so EART is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Thematic ETFs

EART vs SETM: Holdings Overlap & Returns

Share on X Download as PDF

Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, EART returned +10.5% to SETM's +3.9%; 25% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about EART and SETM

Net assets: $47m on Oct 12, 2026 for Global X Rare Earth & Critical Materials ETF, and $421m on Nov 4, 2026 for Sprott Critical Materials ETF.

EART on its own →SETM on its own →

At a glance

8.1%

EART in the S&P 500

9.1%

SETM in the S&P 500

+10.5%

EART total return, 1 year

+3.9%

SETM total return, 1 year

EART · 1 year to Nov 4, 2026 92% of its weight is outside the S&P 500

8% of EART's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 92% is outside the index. Holdings as of Jul 31, 2026.

SETM · 1 year to Nov 4, 2026 91% of its weight is outside the S&P 500

9% of SETM's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 91% is outside the index. Holdings as of Nov 4, 2026.

Pair scorecard

EART costs 0.06 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 6.6 points; SETM is 10.4 times larger.

Points (pts) are percentage points.

EART vs SETM: Holdings Overlap & Returns
Measure	EART	SETM
Return
Measure	EART	SETM
Total return, 1 year	+10.5%	+3.9%
Drawdown
Measure	EART	SETM
Below its all-time high	31.8%, high on Feb 27, 2026	37.4%, high on Jan 28, 2026
Against its benchmark
Measure	EART	SETM
What it tracks	Rare earth and critical materials	Rare earth and critical materials
Against the S&P 500, 1 year		behind by 10.9 pts
Its benchmark, total return, 1 year		+14.8%
Against its benchmark, 1 year		behind by 10.9 pts
Cost and size
Measure	EART	SETM
Expense ratio	0.59%	0.65%
Net assets, as of Oct 12, 2026	$47m	$491m
Holdings
Measure	EART	SETM
Holdings in common	25%

Method

What they share

25%

By the books each fund has filed, EART and SETM hold 25% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Nov 4, 2026.

50%

0 half 100%

half

25% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first EART SETM

FREEPORT-MCMORAN INC. 5.00% 5.47%

ALBEMARLE CORPORATION 3.14% 3.61%

PLS GROUP LIMITED 3.36% 3.12%

LYNAS RARE EARTHS LIMITED 3.04% 4.87%

ANTOFAGASTA PLC 4.71% 2.68%

SOUTHERN COPPER CORPORATION 4.90% 2.48%

MP MATERIALS CORP 2.19% 2.86%

IGO LIMITED 1.05% 1.62%

Hudbay Minerals Inc. 3.20% 1.02%

MMG Limited 1.56% 0.72%

NICKEL INDUSTRIES LIMITED 0.42% 0.35%

Lithium Americas Corp 0.34% 0.29%

Only in one fund ↓

Only in EART

ANGLO AMERICAN PLC 5.39%

Grupo Mexico, S.A.B. de C.V. 5.03%

RIO TINTO PLC 4.81%

VALTERRA PLATINUM LIMITED 3.80%

China Northern Rare Earth (Group) High-Tech Co., Ltd. 3.66%

Sumitomo Metal Mining Co., Ltd. 3.62%

EVE Energy Co., Ltd. 3.41%

Boliden AB 3.38%

Only in SETM

Cameco Corp. 4.81%

NAC Kazatomprom JSC 4.15%

Teck Resources Ltd. 3.95%

Hecla Mining Co. 3.42%

Sociedad Quimica y Minera de Chile SA 3.40%

First Majestic Silver Corp. 3.33%

Uranium Energy Corp. 3.01%

Aya Gold & Silver Inc. 2.79%

Check overlap with more funds →

Window by window

Window by window: EART vs SETM: Holdings Overlap & Returns
	Total return		vs its benchmark
Window	EART	SETM	EART	SETM
3 months	−15.5%	−21.2%	not measured	−21.1 pts vs VOO
6 months	−26.9%	−35.3%	not measured	−40.3 pts vs VOO
1 year	+10.5%	+3.9%	not measured	−10.9 pts vs VOO
3 years	+74.9%	+57.7%	not measured	−25.6 pts vs VOO
Since launchNot the same days: EART Jan 2022 · SETM Feb 2023	+11.4%	+29.5%	not measured	−64.0 pts vs VOO

Open this comparison in the app →

Side by side

EART Global X Rare Earth & Critical Materials ETF · Holds 50 stocks in rare earth and critical materials, 8% of its weight in S&P 500 companies SETM Sprott Critical Materials ETF · Holds 156 stocks in rare earth and critical materials, 9% of its weight in S&P 500 companies

Issuer Global X Sprott

Theme Rare earth and critical materials Rare earth and critical materials

In the S&P 500 8.1% 9.1%

Active share vs the S&P 500 99.8% 99.8%

In the Nasdaq-100 0.0% 0.0%

Holdings 50 156

Top ten, share of the fund 44.3% 40.1%

Expense ratio 0.59% 0.65%

Fee for the differing part 0.59% 0.65%

Total return, 1 year +10.5% +3.9%

vs its benchmark not measured −10.9 pts vs VOO

Below its high −31.8% −37.4%

Net assets, EART as of Oct 12, 2026 and SETM as of Nov 4, 2026 $47m $421m

As of Nov 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

25% of the two portfolios are the same securities at the same weight.

Alert

About each fund

EART

By weight, 8% of EART's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 44% of the fund across 50 positions, as filed for Jul 31, 2026. Over the year to Nov 4, 2026 the fund returned +10.5% with distributions reinvested. It sits 31.8% below its all-time high of Feb 27, 2026.

SETM

By weight, 9% of SETM's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 40% of the fund across 156 positions, as published by its issuer for Nov 4, 2026. Over the year to Nov 4, 2026 the fund returned +3.9% with distributions reinvested against +14.8% for its benchmark, the S&P 500 Total Return Index, so a holder was behind by 10.9 pts. It sits 37.4% below its all-time high of Jan 28, 2026.

Questions people ask

Do EART and SETM hold the same stocks?: By their latest filings, 25% of their books are the same securities at the same weight. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.
Which is more different from the S&P 500, EART or SETM?: EART has 8% of its weight in S&P 500 names and SETM has 9%, so EART differs more from the index.
Which is cheaper, EART or SETM?: EART charges 0.59% a year and SETM charges 0.65%, so EART is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

EART vs REMX EART vs REXC EART vs WDIG EART vs FMTL SETM vs WDIG SETM vs REXC SETM vs FMTL SETM vs ISTM

Where to next

All thematic ETFs ranked by the S&P 500 Difference Score →How the scores are computed →EART on its own →SETM on its own →EART dividend history →EART holdings →SETM dividend history →SETM holdings →Method →Standards and sources →

Sources and dates

EART filings on SEC EDGAR ↗

EART prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗

Global X page for EART ↗

SETM filings on SEC EDGAR ↗

SETM prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗

Sprott page for SETM ↗

Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.

How this is computed

Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.

Every number is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested.

Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, EART against SETM, data as of Nov 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/eart-vs-setm

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.