Do DRAM and IGF hold the same stocks?

By their latest filings, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight, which is mostly different names. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.

Which is more different from the S&P 500, DRAM or IGF?

DRAM has 16% of its weight in S&P 500 names and IGF has 32%, so IGF differs more from the index.

Which is cheaper, DRAM or IGF?

DRAM charges 0.65% a year and IGF charges 0.37%, so IGF is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Share on X Download as PDF Open live Compare their flows Ask about these two funds

DRAM vs IGF: which is really different?

DRAM and IGF hold 0% of their weight in the same names. Roundhill Memory ETF and iShares Global Infrastructure ETF.

IGF costs 0.28 points a year less; DRAM is 2.3 times larger.

	DRAM	IGF
Expense ratio	0.65%	0.37%
Net assets, as of Oct 8, 2026	$24.2bn	$10.3bn
Total return, 1 year	not published	+5.3%
What it tracks	Memory and storage	Infrastructure
Holdings in common	0%
S&P 500, total return, since Apr 2, 2026	+19.3%
S&P 500, total return, 1 year		+17.3%
Against the S&P 500, since Apr 2, 2026	ahead by 86.7 pts
Against the S&P 500, 1 year		behind by 11.9 pts
Below its all-time high	29.1%, high on Jun 22, 2026	8.3%, high on Feb 27, 2026

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Oct 8, 2026.

15.7%

DRAM in the S&P 500

31.9%

IGF in the S&P 500

+106.0%

DRAM total return, since launch

+5.3%

IGF total return, 1 year

DRAM · 6 months to Oct 9, 202684% of its weight is outside the S&P 500

16% of DRAM's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 84% is outside the index. Holdings as of Jun 30, 2026.

IGF · 1 year to Oct 9, 202668% of its weight is outside the S&P 500

32% of IGF's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 68% is outside the index. Holdings as of Oct 8, 2026.

ETFIQ Off-Index Score · IGF scores higherHow much of it is not the index it is sold as an alternative to?

DRAM 37.9

IGF 54.1

0.1, the lowest in this set92.3, the highest

A percentile among the 391 thematic ETFs with a holdings filing. All thematic ETFs ranked by it → How it is computed →

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, DRAM and IGF hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Oct 8, 2026.

50%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold, largest shared weight first

Holding DRAM IGF

Only in DRAM

SK hynix Inc 15.89%

Samsung Electronics Co Ltd 14.37%

Sandisk Corp 5.21%

Kioxia Holdings Corp 4.36%

Western Digital Corp 4.30%

Seagate Technology Holdings PL 4.19%

GigaDevice Semiconductor Inc 3.07%

Micron Technology Inc 2.03%

Only in IGF

TRANSURBAN GROUP STAPLED UNITS 4.83%

AENA SME SA 4.73%

NEXTERA ENERGY 4.70%

IBERDROLA 4.14%

GRUPO AEROPORTUARIO DEL PACIFICO A 3.63%

ENBRIDGE 3.60%

AUCKLAND INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT 3.55%

WILLIAMS 3.08%

0% of the two portfolios are the same securities at the same weight.

Performance, window by window

	Total return		vs the S&P 500		vs the Nasdaq-100
Window	DRAM	IGF	DRAM	IGF	DRAM	IGF
3 months	−9.3%	−6.2%	−12.7 pts	−9.6 pts	−12.9 pts	−9.9 pts
6 months	+76.3%	−7.3%	+61.2 pts	−22.4 pts	+53.1 pts	−30.5 pts
1 year	not published	+5.3%	not published	−11.9 pts	not published	−18.2 pts
3 years	not published	+62.1%	not published	−23.6 pts	not published	−45.1 pts
Since launch DRAM Apr 2026 · IGF Dec 2007	+106.0%	+129.4%	+86.7 pts	−508.6 pts	+77.3 pts	−1,460.7 pts

Source: ETFIQ. Open the live comparison on ETFIQ →

On the same fields

DRAM

Roundhill Memory ETF · Holds 12 stocks in memory and storage, 16% of its weight in S&P 500 companies

IGF

iShares Global Infrastructure ETF · Holds 78 stocks in infrastructure, 32% of its weight in S&P 500 companies

Issuer Roundhill iShares

Theme Memory and storage Infrastructure

In the S&P 500 15.7% 31.9%

Active share vs the S&P 500 96.8% 98.3%

In the Nasdaq-100 15.7% 7.2%

Holdings 12 78

Top ten, share of the fund 56.4% 38.0%

Expense ratio 0.65% 0.37%

Fee for the differing part 0.67% 0.38%

Total return, 1 year +106.0% (since it first traded on Apr 2, 2026) +5.3%

vs the S&P 500 +86.7 pts −11.9 pts

vs the Nasdaq-100 +77.3 pts −18.2 pts

Below its high −29.1% −8.3%

Net assets, as of Oct 8, 2026 $24.2bn $10.3bn

As of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

DRAM in plain words

By weight, 16% of DRAM's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 97%. The top ten holdings are 56% of the fund across 12 positions, as filed for Jun 30, 2026. Since it first traded on Apr 2, 2026 the fund returned +106.0% with distributions reinvested against +19.3% for the S&P 500, so a holder was ahead by 86.7 pts. It sits 29.1% below its all-time high of Jun 22, 2026.

IGF in plain words

By weight, 32% of IGF's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 98%. The top ten holdings are 38% of the fund across 78 positions, as published by its issuer for Oct 8, 2026. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 the fund returned +5.3% with distributions reinvested against +17.3% for the S&P 500, so a holder was behind by 11.9 pts. It sits 8.3% below its all-time high of Feb 27, 2026.

Questions people ask

Do DRAM and IGF hold the same stocks?: By their latest filings, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight, which is mostly different names. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.
Which is more different from the S&P 500, DRAM or IGF?: DRAM has 16% of its weight in S&P 500 names and IGF has 32%, so IGF differs more from the index.
Which is cheaper, DRAM or IGF?: DRAM charges 0.65% a year and IGF charges 0.37%, so IGF is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

DRAM vs IFRA DRAM vs PAVE DRAM vs IBB DRAM vs ITA IGF vs SOXX IGF vs GRID IGF vs ITA IGF vs SMH

DRAM on its own →IGF on its own →How every figure is computed →Standards and sources →

Where these figures came from

DRAM filings on SEC EDGAR ↗DRAM prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗Roundhill page for DRAM ↗IGF filings on SEC EDGAR ↗iShares page for IGF ↗

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.

How this is computed

It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation.

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed.

Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested.

Cite this page

ETFIQ, DRAM against IGF, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/dram-vs-igf

Open data

Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.