IGF vs IGV: which is really different?

IGF and IGV hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and IGF returned +5.3% over the year. iShares Global Infrastructure ETF and iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ETF.

IGF costs 0.01 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 7.9 points; IGV is 1.4 times larger.

IGFIGV
Expense ratio0.37%0.38%
Net assets, as of Oct 8, 2026$10.3bn$14.6bn
Total return, 1 year+5.3%−2.6%
What it tracksInfrastructureCloud and software
Holdings in common0%
S&P 500, total return, 1 year+17.3%
Against the S&P 500, 1 yearbehind by 11.9 ptsbehind by 19.8 pts
Below its all-time high8.3%, high on Feb 27, 2026

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 8, 2026.

31.9%
IGF in the S&P 500
80.6%
IGV in the S&P 500
+5.3%
IGF total return, 1 year
−2.6%
IGV total return, 1 year
IGF · 1 year to Oct 9, 202668% of its weight is outside the S&P 500
68% of its weight is outside the S&P 50032% of IGF's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 68% is outside the index. Holdings as of Oct 8, 2026.32%68%of its weight in S&P 500 companiesof its weight outside the S&P 500active share 98% · top ten 38% of the fund · 78 holdings as published by its issuer for Oct 8, 2026 · Nasdaq-100: 7% in68% of its weight is outside the S&P 50032% of IGF's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 68% is outside the index. Holdings as of Oct 8, 2026.32%68%inoutside the S&P 500active share 98% · Nasdaq-100: 7% in

32% of IGF's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 68% is outside the index. Holdings as of Oct 8, 2026.

IGV · 1 year to Oct 9, 202619% of its weight is outside the S&P 500
19% of its weight is outside the S&P 50081% of IGV's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 19% is outside the index. Holdings as of Oct 8, 2026.81%19%of its weight in S&P 500 companiesoutside the S&P 500active share 92% · top ten 61% of the fund · 108 holdings as published by its issuer for Oct 8, 2026 · Nasdaq-100: 66% in19% of its weight is outside the S&P 50081% of IGV's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 19% is outside the index. Holdings as of Oct 8, 2026.81%19%in the S&P 50019% of its weight outside the S&P 500active share 92% · Nasdaq-100: 66% in

81% of IGV's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 19% is outside the index. Holdings as of Oct 8, 2026.

ETFIQ Off-Index Score · IGF scores higherHow much of it is not the index it is sold as an alternative to?
0.1, the lowest in this set92.3, the highest

A percentile among the 391 thematic ETFs with a holdings filing. All thematic ETFs ranked by it → How it is computed →

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, IGF and IGV hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Oct 8, 2026.

half

0% in common

Positions both hold, largest shared weight first
Holding IGF IGV
Only in IGF
TRANSURBAN GROUP STAPLED UNITS 4.83%
AENA SME SA 4.73%
NEXTERA ENERGY 4.70%
IBERDROLA 4.14%
GRUPO AEROPORTUARIO DEL PACIFICO A 3.63%
ENBRIDGE 3.60%
AUCKLAND INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT 3.55%
WILLIAMS 3.08%
Only in IGV
PALO ALTO NETWORKS 9.41%
PALANTIR TECHNOLOGIES CLASS A 9.28%
CROWDSTRIKE HOLDINGS CLASS A 8.55%
MICROSOFT 8.41%
ORACLE 6.64%
SERVICENOW 4.47%
FORTINET 3.92%
SALESFORCE 3.91%

0% of the two portfolios are the same securities at the same weight.

Performance, window by window

Total returnvs the S&P 500vs the Nasdaq-100
WindowIGFIGVIGFIGVIGFIGV
3 months−6.2%+21.9%−9.6 pts+18.5 pts−9.9 pts+18.3 pts
6 months−7.3%+50.9%−22.4 pts+35.8 pts−30.5 pts+27.7 pts
1 year+5.3%−2.6%−11.9 pts−19.8 pts−18.2 pts−26.2 pts
3 years+62.1%+59.8%−23.6 pts−26.0 pts−45.1 pts−47.5 pts
Since launch
IGF Dec 2007 · IGV Jul 2001
+129.4%+1,022.6%−508.6 pts+119.1 pts−1,460.7 pts−943.1 pts

Source: ETFIQ. Open the live comparison on ETFIQ →

On the same fields

IGF
iShares Global Infrastructure ETF · Holds 78 stocks in infrastructure, 32% of its weight in S&P 500 companies
IGV
iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ETF · Holds 108 stocks in cloud and software, 81% of its weight in S&P 500 companies
Theme Infrastructure Cloud and software
In the S&P 500 31.9% 80.6%
Active share vs the S&P 500 98.3% 92.4%
In the Nasdaq-100 7.2% 65.7%
Holdings 78 108
Top ten, share of the fund 38.0% 61.0%
Expense ratio 0.37% 0.38%
Fee for the differing part 0.38% 0.41%
Total return, 1 year +5.3% −2.6%
vs the S&P 500 −11.9 pts −19.8 pts
vs the Nasdaq-100 −18.2 pts −26.2 pts
Below its high −8.3% −4.3%
Net assets, as of Oct 8, 2026 $10.3bn $14.6bn

As of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

IGF in plain words

By weight, 32% of IGF's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 98%. The top ten holdings are 38% of the fund across 78 positions, as published by its issuer for Oct 8, 2026. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 the fund returned +5.3% with distributions reinvested against +17.3% for the S&P 500, so a holder was behind by 11.9 pts. It sits 8.3% below its all-time high of Feb 27, 2026.

IGV in plain words

By weight, 81% of IGV's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 92%. The top ten holdings are 61% of the fund across 108 positions, as published by its issuer for Oct 8, 2026. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 the fund returned −2.6% with distributions reinvested against +17.3% for the S&P 500, so a holder was behind by 19.8 pts.

Questions people ask

Do IGF and IGV hold the same stocks?
By their latest filings, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight, which is mostly different names. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.
Which is more different from the S&P 500, IGF or IGV?
IGF has 32% of its weight in S&P 500 names and IGV has 81%, so IGF differs more from the index.
Which is cheaper, IGF or IGV?
IGF charges 0.37% a year and IGV charges 0.38%, so IGF is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.

How this is computed

It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation.

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed.

Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested.

Cite this page

ETFIQ, IGF against IGV, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/igf-vs-igv

Open data

Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.