DIPR vs NASA: which is really different?

DIPR and NASA hold 42% of their weight in the same names. Corgi Space & Satellite Communications ETF and Tema Space Innovators ETF.

19.1%
DIPR in the S&P 500
2.6%
NASA in the S&P 500
−13.8%
DIPR total return, since launch
−4.8%
NASA total return, since launch
DIPR · 3 months to Sep 30, 202681% of its weight is outside the S&P 500
81% of its weight is outside the S&P 50019% of DIPR's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 81% is outside the index19%81%in the S&P 500of its weight outside the S&P 500active share 100% · top ten 59% of the fund · 29 holdings filed Sep 30, 2026 · Nasdaq-100: 0% in81% of its weight is outside the S&P 50019% of DIPR's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 81% is outside the index19%81%inoutside the S&P 500active share 100% · top ten 59% of the fund

19% of DIPR's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 81% is outside the index

NASA · 6 months to Sep 30, 202697% of its weight is outside the S&P 500
97% of its weight is outside the S&P 5003% of NASA's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 97% is outside the index3%97%3% of its weight in S&P 500 companiesof its weight outside the S&P 500active share 100% · top ten 66% of the fund · 35 holdings filed Sep 30, 2026 · Nasdaq-100: 2% in97% of its weight is outside the S&P 5003% of NASA's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 97% is outside the index3%97%3% of its weight in S&P 500 companiesof its weight outside the S&P 500active share 100% · top ten 66% of the fund

3% of NASA's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 97% is outside the index

ETFIQ Off-Index Score · NASA scores higherHow much of it is not the index it is sold as an alternative to?
0.1, the lowest in this set92.0, the highest

A percentile among the 375 thematic ETFs with a holdings filing. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All thematic ETFs ranked by it → How it is computed →

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, DIPR and NASA hold 42% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Sep 30, 2026.

half

42% in common

Positions both hold, largest shared weight first
Holding DIPR NASA
Space Exploration Technologies Corp 13.38% 7.46%
Rocket Lab Corp 7.29% 10.35%
Viasat Inc 5.35% 5.19%
AST SpaceMobile Inc 4.21% 6.94%
Voyager Technologies Inc 3.11% 3.11%
MDA Space Ltd 3.68% 2.99%
Firefly Aerospace Inc 2.24% 3.81%
Intuitive Machines Inc 2.09% 3.44%
Satellogic Inc 2.06% 2.03%
BlackSky Technology Inc 1.68% 2.24%
Planet Labs PBC 2.35% 1.55%
Redwire Corp 3.26% 0.98%
Only in DIPR
Lockheed Martin Corp 6.31%
Garmin Ltd 5.90%
Iridium Communications Inc 4.50%
Globalstar Inc 4.08%
Frequency Electronics Inc 3.33%
MACOM Technology Solutions Holdings Inc 3.06%
Mercury Systems Inc 2.76%
Trimble Inc 2.71%
Only in NASA
SPACEX SPV EXPOSURE 16.75%
UNIVERSAL MICROWAVE TECHNOLOGY INC 4.88%
FILTRONIC PLC 3.89%
5N PLUS INC 3.38%
ASTROSCALE HOLDINGS INC 2.33%
LUMENTUM HOLDINGS INC 2.17%
WIN SEMICONDUCTORS CORP 1.82%
AIXTRON SE 1.60%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed.

42% of the two portfolios are the same securities at the same weight.

Performance, window by window

Total returnvs the S&P 500vs the Nasdaq-100
WindowDIPRNASADIPRNASADIPRNASA
3 months−14.9%−18.6%−17.5 pts−21.2 pts−17.1 pts−20.8 pts
6 monthsnot published−9.3%not published−26.3 ptsnot published−36.1 pts
Since launch
DIPR May 2026 · NASA Mar 2026
−13.8%−4.8%−18.3 pts−22.7 pts−20.4 pts−33.3 pts

DIPR and NASA over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ. Open the live comparison on ETFIQ →

On the same fields

DIPR
Corgi Space & Satellite Communications ETF · Holds 29 stocks in space, 19% of its weight in S&P 500 companies
NASA
Tema Space Innovators ETF · Holds 35 stocks in space, 3% of its weight in S&P 500 companies
Issuer Corgi Tema
Theme Space Space
In the S&P 500 19.1% 2.6%
Active share vs the S&P 500 99.7% 99.9%
In the Nasdaq-100 0.0% 2.2%
Holdings 29 35
Top ten, share of the fund 58.9% 66.1%
Expense ratio 0.35% 0.75%
Fee for the differing part 0.35% 0.75%
Total return, 1 year −13.8% (since launch on May 6, 2026) −4.8% (since launch on Mar 31, 2026)
vs the S&P 500 −18.3 pts −22.7 pts
vs the Nasdaq-100 −20.4 pts −33.3 pts
Below its high −34.6% −42.8%
Net assets $1m $1.1bn

DIPR and NASA on the same fields, as of Sep 30, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

DIPR in plain words

By weight, 19% of DIPR's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 59% of the fund across 29 positions, as published by its issuer for Sep 30, 2026. Since it launched on May 6, 2026 the fund returned −13.8% with distributions reinvested against +4.5% for the S&P 500, so a holder was behind by 18.3 pts. It sits 34.6% below its all-time high of May 28, 2026.

NASA in plain words

By weight, 3% of NASA's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 66% of the fund across 35 positions, as published by its issuer for Sep 30, 2026. Since it launched on Mar 31, 2026 the fund returned −4.8% with distributions reinvested against +17.9% for the S&P 500, so a holder was behind by 22.7 pts. It sits 42.8% below its all-time high of May 27, 2026.

Questions people ask

Do DIPR and NASA hold the same stocks?
By their latest filings, 42% of their books are the same securities at the same weight, which is a meaningful overlap. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.
Which is more different from the S&P 500, DIPR or NASA?
DIPR has 19% of its weight in S&P 500 names and NASA has 3%, so NASA differs more from the index.
Which is cheaper, DIPR or NASA?
DIPR charges 0.35% a year and NASA charges 0.75%, so DIPR is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Cite this page

ETFIQ, DIPR against NASA, data as of Sep 30, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/dipr-vs-nasa

Open data

Free to use with attribution. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology.