NASA vs WARP: which is really different?

NASA and WARP hold 47% of their weight in the same names. Tema Space Innovators ETF and VanEck Space ETF.

2.6%
NASA in the S&P 500
4.9%
WARP in the S&P 500
−4.8%
NASA total return, since launch
−19.9%
WARP total return, since launch
NASA · 6 months to Sep 30, 202697% of its weight is outside the S&P 500
97% of its weight is outside the S&P 5003% of NASA's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 97% is outside the index3%97%3% of its weight in S&P 500 companiesof its weight outside the S&P 500active share 100% · top ten 66% of the fund · 35 holdings filed Sep 30, 2026 · Nasdaq-100: 2% in97% of its weight is outside the S&P 5003% of NASA's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 97% is outside the index3%97%3% of its weight in S&P 500 companiesof its weight outside the S&P 500active share 100% · top ten 66% of the fund

3% of NASA's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 97% is outside the index

WARP · 3 months to Sep 30, 202695% of its weight is outside the S&P 500
95% of its weight is outside the S&P 5005% of WARP's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 95% is outside the index5%95%inof its weight outside the S&P 500active share 100% · top ten 74% of the fund · 20 holdings filed Sep 30, 2026 · Nasdaq-100: 0% in95% of its weight is outside the S&P 5005% of WARP's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 95% is outside the index5%95%5% of its weight in S&P 500 companiesof its weight outside the S&P 500active share 100% · top ten 74% of the fund

5% of WARP's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 95% is outside the index

ETFIQ Off-Index Score · WARP scores higherHow much of it is not the index it is sold as an alternative to?
0.1, the lowest in this set92.0, the highest

A percentile among the 375 thematic ETFs with a holdings filing. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All thematic ETFs ranked by it → How it is computed →

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, NASA and WARP hold 47% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Sep 30, 2026.

half

47% in common

Positions both hold, largest shared weight first
Holding NASA WARP
ROCKET LAB CORP 10.35% 14.52%
SPACE EXPLORATION TECHNOLOGIES CORP 7.46% 20.43%
AST SPACEMOBILE INC 6.94% 6.46%
VIASAT INC 5.19% 4.86%
FIREFLY AEROSPACE INC 3.81% 4.46%
INTUITIVE MACHINES INC 3.44% 3.44%
MDA SPACE LTD 2.99% 4.62%
VOYAGER TECHNOLOGIES INC 3.11% 2.61%
ASTROSCALE HOLDINGS INC 2.33% 1.76%
PLANET LABS PBC 1.55% 4.29%
REDWIRE CORP 0.98% 4.38%
ECHOSTAR CORP 0.41% 4.89%
Only in NASA
SPACEX SPV EXPOSURE 16.75%
UNIVERSAL MICROWAVE TECHNOLOGY INC 4.88%
FILTRONIC PLC 3.89%
5N PLUS INC 3.38%
BLACKSKY TECHNOLOGY INC 2.24%
LUMENTUM HOLDINGS INC 2.17%
SATELLOGIC INC 2.03%
WIN SEMICONDUCTORS CORP 1.82%
Only in WARP
Iridium Communications Inc 4.58%
Globalstar Inc 4.57%
Sky Perfect Jsat Holdings Inc 3.50%
Ses Sa 2.71%
Nextnav Inc 2.35%
Avio Spa 2.22%
Eutelsat Communications Sa 1.35%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed.

47% of the two portfolios are the same securities at the same weight.

Performance, window by window

Total returnvs the S&P 500vs the Nasdaq-100
WindowNASAWARPNASAWARPNASAWARP
3 months−18.6%−18.7%−21.2 pts−21.2 pts−20.8 pts−20.8 pts
6 months−9.3%not published−26.3 ptsnot published−36.1 ptsnot published
Since launch
NASA Mar 2026 · WARP May 2026
−4.8%−19.9%−22.7 pts−24.7 pts−33.3 pts−26.6 pts

NASA and WARP over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ. Open the live comparison on ETFIQ →

On the same fields

NASA
Tema Space Innovators ETF · Holds 35 stocks in space, 3% of its weight in S&P 500 companies
WARP
VanEck Space ETF · Holds 20 stocks in space, 5% of its weight in S&P 500 companies
Issuer Tema VanEck
Theme Space Space
In the S&P 500 2.6% 4.9%
Active share vs the S&P 500 99.9% 100.0%
In the Nasdaq-100 2.2% 0.0%
Holdings 35 20
Top ten, share of the fund 66.1% 73.8%
Expense ratio 0.75% 0.50%
Fee for the differing part 0.75% 0.50%
Total return, 1 year −4.8% (since launch on Mar 31, 2026) −19.9% (since launch on May 7, 2026)
vs the S&P 500 −22.7 pts −24.7 pts
vs the Nasdaq-100 −33.3 pts −26.6 pts
Below its high −42.8% −47.2%
Net assets $1.1bn $43m

NASA and WARP on the same fields, as of Sep 30, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

NASA in plain words

By weight, 3% of NASA's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 66% of the fund across 35 positions, as published by its issuer for Sep 30, 2026. Since it launched on Mar 31, 2026 the fund returned −4.8% with distributions reinvested against +17.9% for the S&P 500, so a holder was behind by 22.7 pts. It sits 42.8% below its all-time high of May 27, 2026.

WARP in plain words

By weight, 5% of WARP's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 74% of the fund across 20 positions, as published by its issuer for Sep 30, 2026. Since it launched on May 7, 2026 the fund returned −19.9% with distributions reinvested against +4.8% for the S&P 500, so a holder was behind by 24.7 pts. It sits 47.2% below its all-time high of May 28, 2026.

Questions people ask

Do NASA and WARP hold the same stocks?
By their latest filings, 47% of their books are the same securities at the same weight, which is a meaningful overlap. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.
Which is more different from the S&P 500, NASA or WARP?
NASA has 3% of its weight in S&P 500 names and WARP has 5%, so WARP differs more from the index.
Which is cheaper, NASA or WARP?
NASA charges 0.75% a year and WARP charges 0.50%, so WARP is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Cite this page

ETFIQ, NASA against WARP, data as of Sep 30, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/nasa-vs-warp

Open data

Free to use with attribution. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology.