CSIO vs UPGR: which is really different?
CSIO holds 54.2% of its weight in S&P 500 companies and UPGR 22.9%. Cohen & Steers Infrastructure Opportunities Active ETF and Xtrackers US Green Infrastructure Select Equity ETF.
UPGR costs 0.30 points a year less; CSIO is far larger, $44m against $539,786.
| CSIO | UPGR | |
|---|---|---|
| Expense ratio | 0.65% | 0.35% |
| Net assets, CSIO as of Jun 30, 2026 and UPGR as of Oct 8, 2026 | $44m | $539,786 |
| Total return, 1 year | not published | −11.2% |
| What it tracks | Infrastructure | Infrastructure |
| Holdings in common | not published | |
| S&P 500, total return, since Dec 10, 2025 | +14.4% | |
| S&P 500, total return, 1 year | +17.3% | |
| Against the S&P 500, since Dec 10, 2025 | behind by 2.8 pts | |
| Against the S&P 500, 1 year | behind by 28.5 pts | |
| Below its all-time high | 5.3%, high on Jul 24, 2026 | 26.8%, high on Jun 2, 2026 |
54% of CSIO's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 46% is outside the index. Holdings as of Jun 30, 2026.
23% of UPGR's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 77% is outside the index. Holdings as of May 29, 2026.
A percentile among the 391 thematic ETFs with a holdings filing. All thematic ETFs ranked by it → How it is computed →
Performance, window by window
| Total return | vs the S&P 500 | vs the Nasdaq-100 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Window | CSIO | UPGR | CSIO | UPGR | CSIO | UPGR |
| 3 months | −4.3% | −14.2% | −7.6 pts | −17.6 pts | −7.9 pts | −17.9 pts |
| 6 months | −2.6% | −9.7% | −17.7 pts | −24.8 pts | −25.8 pts | −32.9 pts |
| 1 year | not published | −11.2% | not published | −28.5 pts | not published | −34.8 pts |
| 3 years | not published | +13.7% | not published | −72.1 pts | not published | −93.6 pts |
| Since launch CSIO Dec 2025 · UPGR Jul 2023 | +11.6% | −10.4% | −2.8 pts | −90.6 pts | −8.7 pts | −112.2 pts |
Source: ETFIQ. Open the live comparison on ETFIQ →
On the same fields
As of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
CSIO in plain words
By weight, 54% of CSIO's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 99%. The top ten holdings are 52% of the fund across 29 positions, as filed for Jun 30, 2026. Since it first traded on Dec 10, 2025 the fund returned +11.6% with distributions reinvested against +14.4% for the S&P 500, so a holder was behind by 2.8 pts. It sits 5.3% below its all-time high of Jul 24, 2026.
UPGR in plain words
By weight, 23% of UPGR's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 97%. The top ten holdings are 34% of the fund across 45 positions, as filed for May 29, 2026. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 the fund returned −11.2% with distributions reinvested against +17.3% for the S&P 500, so a holder was behind by 28.5 pts. It sits 26.8% below its all-time high of Jun 2, 2026.
Questions people ask
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation.
Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested.
ETFIQ, CSIO against UPGR, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/csio-vs-upgr
ETFIQ. (Oct 9, 2026). CSIO against UPGR. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/csio-vs-upgr
[CSIO against UPGR (ETFIQ, Oct 9, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/csio-vs-upgr)
Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.