ETFIQ
RankingsCompareHoldingsFlowsResearch
Ask ETFIQETF ModelsMy portfolioWeekly note
A
vs
B
Share on XDownload as PDFOpen liveAsk about these two funds

CSIO vs TOLZ: which is really different?

CSIO holds 54.2% of its weight in S&P 500 companies and TOLZ 33.9%. Cohen & Steers Infrastructure Opportunities Active ETF and ProShares DJ Brookfield Global Infrastructure ETF.

TOLZ costs 0.19 points a year less; TOLZ is 3.7 times larger.

CSIOTOLZ
Expense ratio0.65%0.46%
Net assets, CSIO as of Jun 30, 2026 and TOLZ as of Oct 9, 2026$44m$162m
Total return, 1 yearnot published+8.1%
What it tracksInfrastructureInfrastructure
Holdings in commonnot published
S&P 500, total return, since Dec 10, 2025+14.4%
S&P 500, total return, 1 year+17.3%
Against the S&P 500, since Dec 10, 2025behind by 2.8 pts
Against the S&P 500, 1 yearbehind by 9.2 pts
Below its all-time high5.3%, high on Jul 24, 20267.5%, high on Mar 2, 2026
54.2%
CSIO in the S&P 500
33.9%
TOLZ in the S&P 500
+11.6%
CSIO total return, since launch
+8.1%
TOLZ total return, 1 year
CSIO · 6 months to Oct 9, 202646% of its weight is outside the S&P 500
46% of its weight is outside the S&P 50054% of CSIO's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 46% is outside the index. Holdings as of Jun 30, 2026.54%46%of its weight in S&P 500 companiesof its weight outside the S&P 500active share 99% · top ten 52% of the fund · 29 holdings as filed for Jun 30, 2026 · Nasdaq-100: 7% in46% of its weight is outside the S&P 50054% of CSIO's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 46% is outside the index. Holdings as of Jun 30, 2026.54%46%in the S&P 500outsideactive share 99% · Nasdaq-100: 7% in

54% of CSIO's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 46% is outside the index. Holdings as of Jun 30, 2026.

TOLZ · 1 year to Oct 9, 202666% of its weight is outside the S&P 500
66% of its weight is outside the S&P 50034% of TOLZ's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 66% is outside the index. Holdings as of Oct 8, 2026.34%66%of its weight in S&P 500 companiesof its weight outside the S&P 500active share 99% · top ten 39% of the fund · 115 holdings as published by its issuer for Oct 8, 2026 · Nasdaq-100: 2% in66% of its weight is outside the S&P 50034% of TOLZ's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 66% is outside the index. Holdings as of Oct 8, 2026.34%66%inoutside the S&P 500active share 99% · Nasdaq-100: 2% in

34% of TOLZ's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 66% is outside the index. Holdings as of Oct 8, 2026.

ETFIQ Off-Index Score · CSIO scores higherHow much of it is not the index it is sold as an alternative to?
0.1, the lowest in this set92.3, the highest

A percentile among the 391 thematic ETFs with a holdings filing. All thematic ETFs ranked by it → How it is computed →

Performance, window by window

Total returnvs the S&P 500vs the Nasdaq-100
WindowCSIOTOLZCSIOTOLZCSIOTOLZ
3 months−4.3%−5.5%−7.6 pts−8.8 pts−7.9 pts−9.1 pts
6 months−2.6%−6.9%−17.7 pts−22.1 pts−25.8 pts−30.1 pts
1 yearnot published+8.1%not published−9.2 ptsnot published−15.5 pts
3 yearsnot published+51.4%not published−34.4 ptsnot published−55.9 pts
Since launch
CSIO Dec 2025 · TOLZ Mar 2014
+11.6%+111.3%−2.8 pts−308.8 pts−8.7 pts−740.8 pts

Source: ETFIQ. Open the live comparison on ETFIQ →

On the same fields

CSIO
Cohen & Steers Infrastructure Opportunities Active ETF · Holds 29 stocks in infrastructure, 54% of its weight in S&P 500 companies
TOLZ
ProShares DJ Brookfield Global Infrastructure ETF · Holds 115 stocks in infrastructure, 34% of its weight in S&P 500 companies
Issuer Cohen & Steers ProShares
Theme Infrastructure Infrastructure
In the S&P 500 54.2% 33.9%
Active share vs the S&P 500 99.0% 98.9%
In the Nasdaq-100 6.8% 2.1%
Holdings 29 115
Top ten, share of the fund 51.9% 39.4%
Expense ratio 0.65% 0.46%
Fee for the differing part 0.66% 0.47%
Total return, 1 year +11.6% (since it first traded on Dec 10, 2025) +8.1%
vs the S&P 500 −2.8 pts −9.2 pts
vs the Nasdaq-100 −8.7 pts −15.5 pts
Below its high −5.3% −7.5%
Net assets, CSIO as of Jun 30, 2026 and TOLZ as of Oct 9, 2026 $44m $162m

As of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

CSIO in plain words

By weight, 54% of CSIO's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 99%. The top ten holdings are 52% of the fund across 29 positions, as filed for Jun 30, 2026. Since it first traded on Dec 10, 2025 the fund returned +11.6% with distributions reinvested against +14.4% for the S&P 500, so a holder was behind by 2.8 pts. It sits 5.3% below its all-time high of Jul 24, 2026.

TOLZ in plain words

By weight, 34% of TOLZ's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 99%. The top ten holdings are 39% of the fund across 115 positions, as published by its issuer for Oct 8, 2026. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 the fund returned +8.1% with distributions reinvested against +17.3% for the S&P 500, so a holder was behind by 9.2 pts. It sits 7.5% below its all-time high of Mar 2, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which is more different from the S&P 500, CSIO or TOLZ?
CSIO has 54% of its weight in S&P 500 names and TOLZ has 34%, so CSIO differs more from the index.
Which is cheaper, CSIO or TOLZ?
CSIO charges 0.65% a year and TOLZ charges 0.46%, so TOLZ is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
CSIO vs RIFRCSIO vs GIICSIO vs BKGICSIO vs NFRATOLZ vs GLIXTOLZ vs EFRATOLZ vs IPAVTOLZ vs GII
CSIO on its own →TOLZ on its own →How every figure is computed →Standards and sources →
Where these figures came from
CSIO filings on SEC EDGAR ↗CSIO prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗Cohen & Steers website ↗TOLZ filings on SEC EDGAR ↗ProShares page for TOLZ ↗

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.

How this is computed

It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation.

Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested.

Cite this page

ETFIQ, CSIO against TOLZ, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/csio-vs-tolz

Open data

Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.